Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kinetic
Missing Iraqi High-Precision Nuclear Experiment Was Stolen by Experts
Oct 16, 2004
Missing Iraqi High-Precision Nuclear Experiment Was Stolen by Experts, Not Looted, Diplomats Say
There are indications that missing high-precision nuclear-related equipment in Iraq was removed by experts working systematically, contrary to claims by Iraqi officials that the equipment was taken during disorganized looting, diplomats said yesterday (see GSN, Oct. 14).
Satellite imagery available to the International Atomic Energy Agency of Iraqi nuclear sites indicates the scale and complexity of an operation to remove the missing equipment, one diplomat said.
“Our assumption is that this had to have been an organized effort by professionals who had to have had heavy lifting equipment and big trucks,” the diplomat said (George Jahn, Associated Press/Boston Herald, Oct. 14).
Meanwhile, Russia yesterday called on the United States and the interim Iraqi government to allow inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency and the U.N. Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission to return to Iraq, according to Agence France-Presse.
“We believe that these organizations, which possess all the necessary expertise to that end, must as soon as possible receive unlimited access to Iraq’s nuclear sites to resume their interrupted task,” Russian Foreign Ministry spokesman Alexander Yakovenko said in a statement (Agence France-Presse/SpaceWar.com, Oct. 15).
http://www.all-hands.net/pn/modules....ticle&sid=1348. |
As you said, there was satellite imagery and nuclear equipment moving need heavy machine. If you have a memory, do you remember there was a UN weapon inspect team with IAEA experts in Iraq just before Bush invading Iraq. Saddam was forced to let the inspection team to check everywhere they wanted even his palace. How couldn't they find anything then but now you had that question?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kinetic
.Didn't hurt much? Have you seen the pictures?
Two photos: 4 months apart.
 
. |
I said "It seems the poison didn't hurt his
health much." Please don't confuse the two words "
face" and "
health".
You put the pictures here. It only strenthens my word: A destroyed face played propaganda to the utmost.
And you still haven't answer my questions. Repeat:
1. Most poison were used to hurt victim's health, on the purpose to take their lives. A poison to destroy someone's face is rarely heard.
2. Yushchenko vigorously active in election. It seems the poison didn't hurt his health much.
3. Yushchenko and Western media blow the trumpet said that he was poisoned. It seems the poison was selected for propaganda much more than killing.
4. Motive is important in any case. Who benefit from this election if the victim having a destroyed face?
5. Is perpetrator an amateur who selected a wrong poison to let others know that Yushchenko was obviously poisoned? Or just want to have a propaganda?
Is Yushchenko a superman? Or is new KGB too incompetent? Or something else?
------------
Make a blackmail more efficient (1/8)
Bush was elected not by people but inside group (7)
"Democrat wins Washington with 130 votes". Mercury News reported on Dec. 24. It said Democrat Christine Gregoire won the election by 130 votes out of 2.9million ballots cast in third round of recounting by hand. The previous count and recount declared that she had lost to her GOP rival Dino Rossi by 261 and 42 votes separately. The article came with a picture of smiling C. Gregoire. She really had a reason to smile to win the seat of governor of Washington at such a slim margin:0.004%.
The price of this victory may be big for Democrat : The seat of Presidency of US. I think it's a concession to the pressure of people whom demand investigation on obvious election fraud in Florida and Ohio.
Strange enough, the protest on rigging election are mostly from individual groups or observer. The high ranking of Democrats seem keep a blind eye on it. Kerry quickly admits his failure despite a controversial election. Have you ever heard any words from Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Edwards..... about the fraud? These people are experts. They know the principle of game. If there is no order from inside group, they won't make a move.
As a matter of fact, the result of election was decided long time ago. When they pushed Howard Dean out of the campaign in Democrat's Primary, the inside group had got what they want already. There is little difference between Kerry and Bush. They both voted for war and Patriot Act. Bush was elected because he was proved a loyalty of inside group. He was more eager to sell his soul.
The skill to squeeze more from an election now is more advanced. Though they are able to make a unilateral victory for a candidate, Feds created a situation that by only control several hundreds of votes they can decide a governor of a state. Or by only control the election result of a state, they can decide a president of US. With which they can more efficiently to blackmail the candidate.