Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad_Michael
Nice rant.
This "solution" offered here is not justified or supported by any rational analysis given and is indeed, very unlikely to address the alleged "problem" (indeed, looks like it is more related to the cause rather than any kind of solution).
|
Do you have anything to contribute besides casting FUD?
FUD = Fear Uncertainty & Doubt ( a sleezy sales tactic used to discredit the competition based the purchaser's lack of knowledge, so that they will stick with your well known product. Example: "You could be in for trouble if you go that way. Best to stick with what you know." )
You statement reeks of political FUD and nothing else.
You have made a statement, which constitutes nay-saying, without argument to support the negative attitude.
Please note my user name "FUDFREE".
Don't give you me your FUD, I don't accept delivery.
Why, according to you, does the analysis given not address the problem?
Why, according to you, would such a change cause the government to be more controlled by the priviledged class and special interest groups, than it is now? (The Problem)
You have expressed attitude, but no substance.
As it stands your statement is meaningless and useless, other than to create FUD around a proposition that, I would guess, you might find threatening.
All you have said in effect is that you personally don't want to give up political parties, but for no supported reason.
Tell me why you think political parties are better than independent representatives.
FUDFREE
Get rid of the endless cycle of political FUD!
Vote to be represented, not ruled!
Independents represent you, not the party whip.
Support the "James Madison Ammendment" to ban all politcal parties.
Vote independent