Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidei Defensor
See posts 65, 67, 69 and 72.
If you'd like to discuss what I said we can do that. Muspell seems incapable of having a discussion without recasting one's position into a strawman to be knocked down. If that's the way it's going to be I'm not going to waste my time just to reply to each post with something along the lines of "No, that's not what I said. I said (.....)" and repeating myself over and over.
|
I'm perfectly capable of reading, thank you.
Unless you can form an argument on your own without resting your reasoning on "semantic extentions" of other arguments, then I suggest your case may be so weak it is not worth cracking your fingers to defend it. Of course, you have made no argument for any case, but I think I am justified in assuming you do have something else to contribute.
Of course, this is a mere courtesy, you understand, and not actually a futile request for you to make a substantive argument for whatever case you happen to imply you support. Becuse I very much doubt you will do that.