Quote:
Originally Posted by muspell
I'm perfectly capable of reading, thank you.
Unless you can form an argument on your own without resting your reasoning on "semantic extentions" of other arguments, then I suggest your case may be so weak it is not worth cracking your fingers to defend it. Of course, you have made no argument for any case, but I think I am justified in assuming you do have something else to contribute.
Of course, this is a mere courtesy, you understand, and not actually a futile request for you to make a substantive argument for whatever case you happen to imply you support. Becuse I very much doubt you will do that.
|
Thanks for the courtesy. I'm not interested in convincing you of anything so you needn't worry about that. So, when you happen upon a post that you think makes no substantive contribution you can just move along. (That's ordinarily what I do when I see yours.) I'd much prefer that than having to respond to your posts in order to deny your fictional characterizations. We'll both be happier that way, I think.
