Quote:
Originally Posted by muspell
So, no substantive argument, no critique of the reasoning, no nothing. By all means, please prove me right. It's just so satisfying to realize people apparently come here to deliberately sabotage discussions, and are proud to more or less announce it.
|
Have you admitted it?
Your response here is actually quite comical given that you have offered nothing to the discussion other than accusing me of saying something I did not say (i.e. a strawman).
The way to sabotage a discussion, muspell, is to pretend that one participant has said something that he has not so that he is forced to deny it rather than continuing the discussion. In this case, Slon and I were having a discussion, which you evidently did not understand and chose to interject yourself into in your tiresome strawman-proferring style. My posts pertaining to it (65, 67, 69 and 72) are clear and anyone who is interested can read them and take them for what they are. I have no faith in your ability to understand the discussion or the point I made so I will not engage in the futile endeavor of trying to explain things for you. You've told us that you can read. That should be enough. With practice comprehension will come.
