Quote:
Originally Posted by Fidei Defensor
Have you admitted it?  |
In what alternate universe would that seem to have occured, then?
Quote:
The way to sabotage a discussion, muspell, is to pretend that one participant has said something that he has not so that he is forced to deny it rather than continuing the discussion. In this case, Slon and I were having a discussion, which you evidently did not understand and chose to interject yourself into in your tiresome strawman-proferring style. My posts pertaining to it (65, 67, 69 and 72) are clear and anyone who is interested can read them and take them for what they are. I have no faith in your ability to understand the discussion or the point I made so I will not engage in the futile endeavor of trying to explain things for you. You've told us that you can read. That should be enough. With practice comprehension will come. 
|
Fascinating. And at one point, perhaps I can comprehend so elaborately I also have a licence to throw out utterly ridiculous statements, covered by flatly absurd rhetoric, while still maintaining, beyond repeal through argument, that is reasonable. I can only hope to ever become so enlightened in that respect as you, and I most humbly apologize for questioning your authority on anything involving either logic or reason. Or both, what would I know. I can see now that such a thing would be to arrogantly assume my abilities would ever be up to such an incredible task. Again, forgive me for my audacity in so wrongfully explaining how you're the intellectual equivalent of runny excrement. Please, do accept my most humble apologies. I will now go and cover myself in ashes, which is why I cannot continue to humble myself more in writing here. Forgive me for that as well.