"No solid evidence exists..."

"No solid evidence" in no way implies it never happened, jpsartre 12. "Absence of proof is not proof of absence", right? It's the logic conservatives have used countless times to address the issue of no WMD being found in Iraq, so it must be a valid argument, right? After all, the Christian conservatives have used it enough!

Nice try at the slick evasive maneuver, but I'm still on your tail!!! (Where's that "Red Baron" smiley? ). And, yes, I did read the entire article. I just thought the facts that were revealed were more damning than the mere fact that there wasn't any "solid" proof that the meeting in Canada occurred. What is known tips the balance more towards guilty than innocence.

Gem

__________________
There is no political solution to our troubled evolution.

"Reality, the left-wing liberal conspiracy. "
Credited to Angry American.