View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-02-2007
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,307

   
Re: The Future Republic of Vermont?

Quote:
Originally Posted by kramer View Post
Are you aware that our founding fathers did not envision a socialist style government? As such, Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare, Welfare etc. would not have been enacted under them.

Kramer
They also did not envision airplanes, nuclear submarines or super highways, are we to assume that we should have no air force, a wooden navy and a nation connected by dirt roads to better implement the vision of the founding fathers?

Tax supported schools were an American invention, tax supported Fire Departments were an American invention, tax supported Police Departments were an American invention, Yes, the founding fathers didn't call themselves Socialists, but they were heading down that road, and the Founding Fathers did ordain a Constitution that could be changed, that established a Congress to make laws, because they did not envision that all progress should come to a halt in 1800. So the actual vision of the founding fathers is that the nation would be different in the future, and they trusted the people of the future to make the difficult decisions in the future. What the Founding Fathers thought is that they had given it their best shot, and come up with something that worked in the 1700's, and they set up a system that could change to meet the challenges of the future, precisely because they recognized their own inability to envision what the future might bring.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote