04-18-2007
|
|
Vice President
|
|
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Wherever democracy is
Posts: 7,594
|
|
|
Re: EU aims to criminalise Holocaust denial
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank
Learn from the mistakes of Canada! Here is how our thought-crime tribunals work up here in Soviet Canada.
This racist, sexist, ethnic, implosion of our most fundamental principle and right to be equal of every other person before and under the law is thus replaced by a pernicious and ultimately deadly "Group Rights" legality, totally alien to our historic, inherent legal principles.
Enforcement of the Human Rights Act of Canada and the Human Rights Codes of the provinces has led to the establishment of Human Rights Commissions. They administer the HR Acts and Codes. They try to decide if claims should be brought before a Human Rights Tribunal, for which they also appoint and are responsible for these same judges.
Human Rights Tribunals break every right and principle established over hundreds of years of our legal heritage. These courts are vindictive, biased and an affront to all the fundamental beliefs of our English-speaking and even our French speaking citizens.
Human Rights Tribunals are Racist and an abomination and have no place in our once-free Society.
First, these tribunals are the only tribunals in any of the British Commonwealth nations to presume to have the right to punish non-criminal behaviour. They are separate and apart from our regular court system, although appeals from their judgments may be made to the regular courts (even though many of the so-called crimes have no basis in law). Further, the very concept of "tribunals" in our ancient common law legal system is a totally alien except in a military setting. They are an anathema to free people.
Second, the judge presiding over these tribunals is just one person, not three as the word "tribunal" would suggest. Third, the judge is almost always a Visible Minority person or a Homosexual person while the person charged is always a member of the majority. As such, the judge is always in a conflict of interest situation. Fourth, there are no rules of evidence; anybody can say anything or produce any evidence, verifiable or not. Fifth, there is no right to confront the accuser (the Complainant). Sixth, the person charged (the Respondent) is presumed guilty and forced to prove his or her innocence, the reverse of our most ancient legal right.
Seventh, all investigation and legal costs incurred by the Complainant are paid by the Human Rights Commission. Win or lose, there is no expense to the Complainant.
Eighth, the Respondent, win or lose, pays all his own costs, legal or otherwise.
Ninth, if the respondent loses, he is normally subject to a fine of up to $10,000 (this can be much more and new recommendations are calling for "no limit").
Tenth, and most unfair, if the Respondent (the person or Corporation accused) has to pay a penalty, the money is not a fine going to the State as in a regular court, but is a penalty paid directly to the Complainant. A Win-Win proposition for the Complainant! No wonder the Human Rights Tribunals in Ontario are years behind in dealing with a huge backlog of these cases.
The majority of cases brought to the Tribunals have been cases of discrimination brought by visible minorities. It is therefore, largely, a one-way race-based anti-white mechanism. It is a racist behavioural tribunal which means that Canada has broken our fundamental law of equality before the law. How far has this implosion of our society gone? It is now against the Human Rights Act of Canada (and many Provincial HR Codes) to cause a minority group member to suffer "Mental Anguish" ("Hurt Feelings").
Shades of kids in the schoolyard? "Sticks and stones will break my bones but names will never hurt me." Well, the adjunct to that saying was, "Listen buddy, if you want to live in a free country, you better have a thick skin!" Apparently, our current crop of lawyers and politicos don't know or don't give a damn about the principles, rights or freedoms of today's ill-informed Canadian citizens.
Canada's Racist Laws -- The Destruction of our English-Speaking British History and our Individual Freedoms |
The article is what one could expect with democratic people confusing gleefully ethnicity, lineage and culture.
Quite incredibly enough, this democratic introduces english speaking people are a race. Quite hard.
One point I had to investigate more is about the behaviour of democratic english speaking people to democratic french people in the early days of democratic canada. It seems that I recall a few democratic canadian attempts to ban french language like prohibition of school learning in french and so on.
Whatsoever, with this new democratic law coming up, one can see that democracy is indeed progressing fast in democratic europe.
|