Quote:
Originally Posted by Sal Munella
Actually, it IS a brilliant retort. Roe was a misread of the Constitution, and it was also a suit brought by a woman who now OPPOSES the hideous slaughter of live human beings known as "abortion". Abortion is an issue which should be decided by the individual states and by the LEGISLATURE, not by fiat of 9 people dressed in black robes.
|
You have merely added credence to my theory which I didn't need actually. Thanks anyway.
Quote:
|
And clearly my intellect IS superior to yours, since you actually attempted to equate sperm in a rubber bag to a live human being. How utterly foolish and scientifically ignorant of you, JHC.
|
The evolution of a human life begins with a separate sperm and egg, fertilization and various stages through to birth and the perversity of abortion is that we can not apparently decide at what point we intend to take a stand. This is the point which you failed to see.
Glad you understood the comment about intellect as it was intended. If you caught that but you didn't understand my point about the importance of our tolerance level for aborted life being dependent on the stage of that life, it is possibly not merely your limited intellect that is causing your difficulty in reason and logic.
You see, part of the problem with our current "pro life" culture is that we have difficulty defining "life". The case of Terry Schaivo, debate about embryonic stem cell research, our prior ban on birth control and our current blind eye to fertility clinics disposal of unused fertilized eggs, all point to this obvious issue that you so casually dismiss.