|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante
Perhaps so. But, none the less, in regards to this particular law, the method IS the issue. Saying that it shouldn't be does not change that.
The discussion was asking whether or not the ACOG ever said that this particular procedure was necessary to protect the life/health of the woman.
In light of the post quotes from the ACOG, I still fail to see how actively killing the fetus/baby serves any purpose to that end.
|
OK.
Then by the same token, the consideration of the womans health/life alone, should be the same for all abortion procedures at any stage in the pregnancy.
See what I mean?
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
|