|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dilettante
I still don't see where the ACOG specifies that.
Doesn't it make more sense that the part of the procedure medically useful to the mother (and thus pointed to by the ACOG) is the intact extraction, not the active killing part that so upsets people?
|
How does that make sense?
If the intact extraction is preferable to the inutero dismembermant and annihalation then I guess I'd agree. The hypocrisy of that sentiment is disconcerting.
It is better to rip someone limb from limb as long as your eyes are closed when they die?
Do you see?
PS, please forgive my responding out of turn.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
|