|
Re: Supreme Court upholds Partial Birth Abortion Ban
Quote:
Originally Posted by Native American
That, as they say, is of course debatable.
For example, while YOU may feel that killing a live human being by injecting a pain reliever into him or her, then cutting off his food and water until he or she expires isn't any less disgusting than killing him or her by giving him or her no anethesia, ramming blunt scissors into his or her skull, then vacuuming out his or her brains while he or she twitches in agony, or by giving him or her no anesthesia, then using vicegrips to pull his or her skin off in strips while he or she writhes in agony, then chaining them down outside in the sun until he or she dehydrates to death, OTHERS of us may well feel that some of those killing methods are more barbaric and less humane than others, JHC.
|
We're comparing abortion methods to abortion methods. Name one method of aborting a fetus in which the fetus is given anesthesia and not mamed or dismembered. Seriously. Name one.
Quote:
|
Well, if the various abortion killing methods don't matter to you a whit, how about the various killing methods one could employ to kill a convicted murderer? Do you feel any of THOSE killing methods are "more humane" or "less humane" than others, or "more disgusting" or "less digusting" than others?
|
I will address this if you can name one abortion method in which the fetus is given anesthesia and not mamed or dismembered.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
|