Thank you for proving the point, and demonstrating how utterly fixated on killing babies the left is. The question isn't whether or not PBA is the only, or even the preferable method of ABORTING the baby, the question is whether or not it is ever medically neccesary (even your own citation has made clear it could not come up with a single instance where it is) or even a moderately preferable compared to all options for terminating the PREGNANCY.

The ONLY reason for performing a PBA rather than a full live birth is to kill the baby, PBA is NEVER medically superior to the option of COMPLETING the birth.

Bottom line, if the objective is to terminate the PREGNANCY, then PBA is NEVER medically superior in ANY WAY to simply finishing the delivery (which is almost fully completed and is infact delayed in order to kill the baby). The PBA is only superior if the objective is to KILL the baby.

The AMA has made it clear that it is NEVER neccesary to protect the life or health of the mother (given the equally safe and effective option of live birth), while the ACOG willfully ignores for political and ideological reasons the single most obvious alternative, and limits its scope of discussion to methods of aborting rather than terminating the pregnancy in order to obfuscate and deceive some people who are so god damn studpid as to not understand the basic distinction.

THAT is why you cannot produce any completely unambiguous, matter of fact statement from them that there is EVER any medical superiority or neccesity to PBA over simply completing the delivery of the baby without killing it.

__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane