Quote:
Originally Posted by scarywoody
Ok so how does one measure this? What you have stated is not a measurable goal. It has got to be a lot more in depth with constant smaller goals leading up to the big goal. Not a huge clusterfuck and then hoping to eventually make it to the big goal.
Right, but congress "represents" the people...theoretically.
No matter how bad it is for the country?
Well I think the president has already failed in the strategy department. The american people want change and that is what congress is reflecting.
|
And congress confirmed Rumsfelds replacement, fully knowing what he intended to do, which is continue the fight. Doesnt that indicate they support it? And yes, congress represents the people, so they are equally accountable to the people, not to Bush, and vice versa. As for specific military goals, they are well laid out and measured in the constant military brefings and stability reports to congress. Here is the latest.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...mar2007-01.htm
The problem, as always, is that you liberals get your information soley from the press and preferred pundits, and therefore miss out on the primary source material out there. Just because CNN doesnt report it, doesnt mean it didnt happen.