Thread: NORTH or SOUTH
View Single Post
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2007
htperr6565 htperr6565 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
The voice of doom

 
Member Since: Mar 2007
Location: The Glorious Southlands of the United States
Posts: 1,690

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: NORTH or SOUTH

I would of fought for the South. Slavery would have eventually been abolished, and Lincoln only emancipated the slaves for political reasons, half way through the war, after previous policies made slaves 'contraband.' (Contraband became hard to feed so the union freed them, letting them fend for theirselves) Other reasons why:

1. The South had a more global economic mindset than the protectionist north. The industrialists who benefited from the war eventually dragged us in WW1

2. The south was more likely to complete the Jeffersonian vision of America composed of yeoman farmers, (independent people who would not have embraced industrial slavery as much as the north)
__________________
Anyone with a vision needs to see an eye doctor. -Helmut Schmidt.

"Mrs. Palin, which specific journals and news sources do you read? (after being asked once)"

"Oh, All of them!"
Reply With Quote