Could you give any credible evidence for any of your nutso accusations prior to demanding that anyone answer YOUR questions...?

__________________

Anglo-Saxons genocide on Australian Aborigines

This article is in memory of 17 years old Aboriginal boy Thomas Hickey the latest victim in Aborigines struggle for freedom. In February this year he was IMPILED on the street fence (in cruel barbaric middle age manner) by Anglo-Saxon police in Sydney suburb Redfern in front of many witnesses.
For this crime none has been prosecuted so far.


How Australia was established
Australia was colonized by manly convicted criminals (convicts) expelled from England. Relatively small number of them, we have to admit, were political manly Irish prisoners who tried to liberate Ireland from English and Scottish occupation. In doing such rational step England wanted to achieve two goals:

1. To get rid of its own criminal population
2. To destroy Australian native population in order to reinforce its colonial power and to satisfy appetites of early capitalistic economy.

As soon as convicts arrived they were encouraged to eliminate as much as they could native aboriginal people with very well planed methods which cold be simply described as ? rational, planed, systematic genocide.
How they did this genocide
They applied typical rational Anglo-Saxon method of attacking and killing others the same one as they apply today I would call it “The principal of minimum energy”.
Everything to be done with maximum help of others, quietly and with minimum effort.

At the beginning Aborigines tried to resist occupation by several uprisings which were suppressed with indiscriminate massive massacres of men, women and children.
Practically these events have never been recorded in Australian history and every one who tried to disclose and historically analyze those events was prevented to do so or even prosecuted.
First of all Aborigines were not considered as humans by Anglo-Saxons who treated them as any other native animal.
For example the most popular sport for long period of time was organizing haunting aborigines like rabbets and foxes, as used to be popular in mother England.
No one is sure if they were eaten after killing as a well.

Method of indiscriminate killing for two hundred years until today.

– In 50’s and 60’s British performed Nuclear testing in the Western Australia on the territory where native people lived. Those tests killed thousands of aborigines (Refer books of S. Wonger, Sreten Boskovic, born Yugoslav, who described these horrific events in his novels. He was so moved by suffering of Aborigines people that took aboriginal name S.Wonger went to live with them and wrote many books about their saga. His books became very popular all around the Europe but practically forbidden in Australia). Many years after tests the carbonized bodies of aborigines children, and mothers with babies in their arms could be found in the area where the tests were performed.

- Killing Aboriginal political and other prisoners in the jails all around Australia. The rate of "suicides" of Aboriginals detained in Australian prisons is about twenty times bigger then Anglo-Saxon prisoners.

- Individual killing by the police in public
15 of February 2004, 17 years old Aboriginal boy Thomas Hickey was IMPILED on the street fence (in cruel barbaric middle age manner) by the Anglo-Saxon police in front of many witnesses. This event triggered the latest Aborigines uprising on the street of Sydney suburb Redfern, where 50 people were seriously injured in the clash with the police. Australian Anglo-Saxon media described this uprising as “Hooligans behavior of drug addicts”

Killing by deliberately poisoning and denying basic health services.
International health organizations describe state of health of Aborigines as “worst than in any third world country”.
Majority of money that formally Australian government “invests” in aboriginal health is spent on luxury life of Government bureaucrats, corrupted Anglo-Saxon nurses and doctors for doing nothing.
For example Aborigines have 10 times higher death rate of new born children then Anglo-Saxon population.
In spite of on going protests, uranium mines (The most famous Jabaluka mining) poison waters and land, where Aborigines live, causing cancers and other mortal diseases.

- Killing souls and identity by cruel assimilation or “improving the race”
Shortly after occupation convicts were encourage to rape as many as possible aborigines women as a part of "breeding program" in other to produce whiter population, the convicts called it “organized free fucking”.
Large number of aborigines children were forcefully taken from their mothers as a part of, assimilation program, in order to forget and loose their identity.

They were taken in the catholic and protestant religious institutions where perverted, monks and priests, sadistically raped many of them both girls and boys. Today in Australia they call them “Lost Generation”.
Until sixties Australian aborigines did not officially exist without having basic human right to vote on their own land. For long period of time, going to Sydney suburb Redfern to watch Aborigines was more popular than going to Zoo to see animals.
At that time Australia, together with America and England, furiously criticized and demonized Russia, as a “ non democratic”, ”evil empire” and so on.


Who is responsible for genocide of Aboriginal people in Australia?

Those who organized horrific crimes and those who committed them both came from Mother England. They were instructed and ordered to kill by English Royalties and high ranked politicians and generals, primarily famous Queen Victoria. We know this for sure because the organizers and executioners were proudly honored by lots of medals and many convicts released as a gesture of Queen’s generosity.
Today situation is little bit different. Australia has mixed but still the most influential Anglo-Saxon population. Terrible shrewd game is playing at the moment. As we know Australia is still British colony (Governor General as a Queen-s representative has power to remove Australian prime minister, what for example, happened in 70s when prime minister Goth Whitlam was sect by Queen).
Australian media describes process of reconciliation as “Apologizing EUROPIEN Australians to Aboriginal people” or “Apologizing WHITE Australians to Aboriginal people”. No one mentions those who committed crimes, English or Anglo-Saxons, or Queen of England in “process of reconciliation”.
Newspaper Sydney Morning Herald even managed to find one French, two Dutch and one German among hundred of thousand Anglo-Saxons in British army at the time when Aborigines land was conquered (Ah poor Germans they can be blamed for everything). This “famous historical discovery” by corrupted journalists was enough to blame. The whole Europe and white population of the entire world for ANGLOSAXONS AND QUEEN OF ENGLAND CRIMES.
How their statements are manipulative and shrewd we can see from the following example. When they talk about Second World War they are quite specific in saying “JEPENIES invited Australia”. Everyone knows that would be nonsense and very offensive if someone change this statement saying “ASIANS invaded Australia”.

Conclusion
Let’s conclude:
Europeans, Germans, Italians, French and non Anglo-Saxon Australian population are not responsible for the crimes committed on aboriginal Australians.

THE GENESIDE ON ABORIGINAL POPULACION WAS DONE BY ANGLOSAXONS CRIMINALS (CONVICTS) MANLY WITH ENGLISH AND SCOTISH ORIGIN.
THE ORDER FOR THOSE CRIMES WAS GIVEN BY THE QUENS OF ENGLAND
PRIMERALY BY QUEEN VICTORIA.

PS.
- The term Anglo-Saxon police and Anglo-Saxon army are used to emphasize the racist policy in Australian army and Police. Australian army consists of 97% and Australian police of about 93% of Anglo-Saxon members. Anglo-Saxons represent not more than 50% of the total population in Australia.
Many bright non Anglo-Saxon children, born in Australia, were rejected particularly from army because of their non Anglo-Saxon race.
This policy is designed to preserve Anglo-Saxon privileged position and political oppressive power and to prevent possible uprising of non Anglo-Saxon population.


Note:
- This article was written by an Aboriginal who escaped Australia from prosecution.
He was given protection as political refugee and free education in Russia where he gained university degrees in engineering and philosophy what he would never be

Got a link for that astonishing information?

__________________

no need to get nasty.

All I said was no its not genocide.

do you actually know what genocide is?

I think you are sadly misinformed about what is happening in this country.

I will be the first to say that there has been genocide against the aborigines in the past - most notably the Tasmanian and Victorian populations. I deplore the current governments policy on certain groups of refugees, and I agree that Aboriginal deaths in custody, and incarceration rates are still an issue, as is racism still in some quarters. but we certainly do not practice genocide here, and many Aboriginal people are well respected and valued in this society.

As to the 'racial storms' ... were you referring to Cronulla? largely forgotten now, and immigrant communities were consulted and had input into how to address that.

you think we don't have the chance to express ourselves independently? can you explain how you have arrived at this conclusion? It certainly does not reflect the reality of my life. I openly criticise our government and have never suffered any negative consequences for my troubles.

Iaca, at least be courteous enough to find out a few facts before you start slamming other nations. Including the USA as well as Australia. If you don't I will place you on ignore as I have so many of the arrogant ignorant Americans who post here. For me that would be sad, as I like to hear the perspective of people from non western nations. Increased understanding is the best way to address our differences. If you choose to block out this avenue by ranting at those who disagree with you thenyou are no better than those you criticise.

And find a definition of genocide. No matter how terrible the actions of the Bush administration, it is NOT genocide.

But do you ever stop to think what you hostility to America has cost you?

Plenty of people are unhappy with us but still take our money and live quite well from it.


Hell, China is booming economically, thanks to a great extent from trade with the US. Anyone want to take a guess how much of our oil money ends up in the hands of Arabs who hate us but love to take our money?

And people make fun of President Bush for his lack of diplomacy.

As a single slaughter the killing of Iraqi civilians can well be classified as cenoside - in any case it is a criminal action as mentioned by UN and international law organizations. This must definitely be brought to the International Court of War Criminals. Together with GW Bush, Henry Kissinger should be jailed as well - he is definitely the person who has killed millions of civilians and is the number one war criminal.
However, we must also see this killing as a continuum in the American fascism through the years. Stalin and Hitler were school boys compared with GW Bush and the previous presidents of USA what comes to killing. Here is the list of the previous US made killings and cenosides in the world since the WW2:

China (1945-60): 200K
Greece (1947-49): 100K
Korea (1951-53): 2M
Guatemala (1954-2002): 300K
Vietnam (1960-75): 2M
Laos (1965-73): 500K
Cambodia (1969-75): 1M
Indonesia (1965): 500K
Colombia (1966-2002): 500K
Oman (1970): 10K
Bangladesh (1971): 2M
Uganda (1971-1979): 200K
Chile (1973-1990): 20K
East Timor (1975): 200K
Angola (1975-2002): 1.5M
Argentina (1976-1979): 30K
Afghanistan (1978-2002): 1M
El Salvador (1980-95): 100K
Nicaragua (1980-90): 100K
Mozambique (1981-1988): 1M
Turkey (1984-2002): 50K
Rwanda (1990-1996): 1M
Iraq (1991-2002): 1M
Somalia (1991-1994): 300K
Yugoslavia (1991-2002): 300K
Liberia (1992-2002): 150K
Burundi (1993-1999): 200K
Sudan (1998): 100K
Congo (1998-2002): 3M
...
Pakistan (2003 -): ?
Afghanistan (2003 -): 0.2 M?
Iraq (2003 -): 0.66 M

WOW, You must be very brave to speak out so strongly against such a dangerous power.

I know you weren't talking to me, but yes, I think I know.


(a), (b), and (c) obviously apply here. WRT the war in Iraq, I really don't see how it could be called anything but genocide.

while I agree that in at least some of these countries the US has played a major role in contributing to deaths of civilians, I feel you need to offer a little more explanation as to how the US is implicated, and what role it played.

In at least some of these cases I don't think it is fair to lay the blame at the feet of the US at all, and in others I don't feel that responsibility should be shouldered solely by the US.

I agree with your definition of genocide, and I have opposed the war in Iraq from the first suggestion of an invasion, however I do not believe that we can honestly say the US has a policy of genocide in Iraq.

Maybe, maybe not. Regardless of our intentions, the outcome is the same. Our soldiers do not value Iraqi lives. Abu Ghraib, Gitmo, and the dozens (possibly hundreds) of indiscriminate mass killings of civilians by our soldiers certainly indicates that a genocidal process is occurring, intentional or not.

I cannot tell you how many times I've heard the sentiment, "Nuke the whole middle east and let Allah sort it all out". Sounds like genocidal thought to me. Even if our policy does not explicitly condone genocide, it sure does a good job of implicitly condoning it.

Oh I agree, and certainly I have seen some shocking reports, including down to training - where soldiers were using an outdated and extremely racist text to help them 'understand' the 'Arab mind', and obscene pictures of dead Arabs were on display in training camps with jokes scrawled over them.

I also witnessed the war on Arab television, and believe me, its no joke when you are the only westerner in a tea house surrounded by Arab men who are witnessing skinny half starved Arab families in their own homes being intimidated and brutalised by big fat American soldiers, or American soldiers standing around a car with bullet holes, with seven dead family members, including dead children under three years old, laying on the ground next to it and laughing.

But I still don't know that you can call it out and out genocide. There are also US soldiers who have tried to do the right thing, and who have done their best to help the victims of this war.

I think the US has serious problems with its approach to other peoples, and also with the military training it provides ... might be OK when faced with one on one combat, but it is not suitable for soldiers who have to deal with civilians, but I still don't think thats really genocide. I think its ignorance and arrogance combined. Its interesting though - one of the criticisms of the UN is that its a paper tiger, puts its head in the sand when something needs to be done (such as Rwanda or Bosnia) ... but in actual fact the US administration demonstrates the same selective blindness when it comes to the more deplorable actions of its own troops.

In some ways it reminds me of the over indulgent parent of a bullying child, who excuses his son's reprehensible behaviour towards neighbourhood children with a shrug and trite 'boys will be boys' comment.

As to the calls for blood, the 'nuke them' attitude you see too often here.

I think that is just sheer stupidity from the peanut gallery. people who call for such tactics are in the same vein as the minority of Arabs that celebrated 9/11. stupid, ignorant and not really representative of the US as a nation.

but yes, the administrations not showing some leadership and condemning these kinds of statements could be seen as offering tacit approval to this view. although I would still say it wouldn't reallybe classificed as a policy of genocide ... yet.

This is genocide - no doubt - but who is guilty - why?

Of course there is a chain of events which have made this genocide possible. I would remind you that this genocide is done by Americans (many of them are originally Europeans) - not by hungry native people of the 3rd world.

What made this possible? In USA, there has been a long lasting propaganda campaign by the Hawks - USA needs the oil and those bustards living on the oil fields are just camel hearders and cannot stop us to take our oil. They are enemies, communists, facists, cowards, arabs, muslims, fanatics, anti-americans, etc. This has been a mental war lasting long time. USA needs enemies - otherwise the war industries would kill the president, to whom they have paid so much during the election campaign. It has been the responsibility of the president to CREATE the enemy! How did that happen? By fabricating all the time events which have deteoriated the reputation of the innocent people far away. Repeating this all the time! By orchestrating 911 - and accusing muslims, which did not have anything to do with this. Repeating every day the hatered - telling lies every day on muslims, Iraqies, Syrians, Iranians, Afghans,...etc. They must be klilled!

The result was that the American people was ready to invest one trillion USD to kill the muslims as pressurized by the Hawks!

Here is the result - genocide!

And this has been a completely unjustified and illegal slaughter!

The muslims have not done anything bad for USA - they just happen to live on the oil fields - and they have the longest history of civilization on earth which makes them polite, patient, understanding and calm. The muslims are the most social and anti-militaristic people and they don't even know how to fight, kill and protect themselves agaist brutal agressions.

Therefore 655,000 innocent civilians have been slaughtered by the people of the United States.

Now it is the time for the Americans to explain this!

Your post is an absolute fabrication! You've got Muslims killing Muslims, Muslims killing Americans, etc. and you say they're "polite, understanding and calm"? Such generalizations make you look very uninformed. SOME are polite, SOME are understanding, SOME are patient and SOME are calm but to say that all are is stupidity running rampant. Geez!

__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"