Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 10-14-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by mpd8488 View Post
We live in a diverse community and we do not segregate ourselves. America is a melting pot which means we will have the bad to go along with all the great things it provides. So what have you done to stop these things?
We have segregated ourselves by skin color and now some of us are trying to segregate themselves from people that are condemned by the Christian religion. I just noted that you have the Virginia flag on your posthead. Below is a quote from a measure on your ballot this fall preventing anyone but heterosexuals from equal protection under the law. Read it carefully please. Are you going to vote for this? This is one of the things in which people are culpable unless they actively try to prevent it by at least voting against it.

"This Commonwealth and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance, or effects of marriage. Nor shall this Commonwealth or its political subdivisions create or recognize another union, partnership, or other legal status to which is assigned the rights, benefits, obligations, qualities, or effects of marriage." Commonwealth of Virginia Ban on Gay Marriage

This measure is hate, pure and simple. There is no logical, rational, or scientific reason for a ban like this.
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
LanceA's Avatar
LanceA LanceA is offline
City Council Member
Populist

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: SouthEast
Posts: 160

United_States     Georgia_state

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Mare, I think you fail to credit several parts of others' arguments.

1st) When someone asked you if you knew what "Christian" meant, they were refering to the hijacking of Christianity. You went on to berate them for being ignorant of the hijacking, but Ill let it slide

2) I don't know how often you go to church, or even if you do, but Im certain you'll find few pastors if any who advocate roving band of hooligans (are they the same band or are these isolated incidents?) to beat down gays. You'll find many pastors who argue against such outrageous behaviour. You'll find that their tactics are proving as ineffectual as yours.

3) This leads to my next point, about the "War on Christianity." In the world, 160k christians were martyred last year (http://www.gordonconwell.edu/ockenga...resources.php). Lets not pretend that everyone loves Christianity. Yes its true that there are majority of self-labeled Christians in the US, but what does that mean? Secular humanist culture is constantly attacking the religion. If you watch TV and movies, you'll find many more examples of sex, violence, and intolerence than you will Christian programming. There are many more secular radio stations than Christian radio stations. And, yes, there are Christian groups arguing against inappropriate programming. On college campuses, I know that more people follow a secular lifestyle than follow the teachings of Jesus. There are also college groups trying to remedy this. I assume that the same-sex marriage issue just became a visble and easy target (read: election year issue) which people could attack.

4) Which brings me to my final point. I think that you're soap-boxing for the issue is symptomatic of the Gay Rights Movement in general. Through the 1980s the movement spend a lot of time gaining visibility for its issues. Consequently, the movement has suffered in later years from over-exposure. If you asked the average person on the street, they would probobly say that there are more than ~6 million gays in America. Since gay culture has become trendy, mainstream media has influenced the spread of gay culture. As a result, gay culture and some misrepresentations of it make the situation appear greater than it is. Let's face it, more people watch Will & Grace than the 700 Club. That's not to say that gays ought to repress their culture, but rather that media has overexposed it.
__________________
Hate is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.

Last edited by LanceA; 10-15-2006 at 10:25 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by LanceA View Post
Mare, I think you fail to credit several parts of others' arguments.
Fair enough, let's take a look.

1st) When someone asked you if you knew what "Christian" meant, they were refering to the hijacking of Christianity. You went on to berate them for being ignorant of the hijacking, but Ill let it slide
The question was ambiguous. I answered it as best I could. The person who asked the question did not respond so I don't know if my answer was inappropriate. And unless you have had communication with him, then you don't know either.

2) I don't know how often you go to church, or even if you do, but Im certain you'll find few pastors if any who advocate roving band of hooligans (are they the same band or are these isolated incidents?) to beat down gays. You'll find many pastors who argue against such outrageous behaviour. You'll find that their tactics are proving as ineffectual as yours.
My experience is that everything has been ineffectual. If you read my post then you know that I said that "not all Christians" behave this way, but if you look around you will find that the only groups bashing gay and trans people in this country are basing their actions on Christian dogma and even if these "bashers" are a minority, they are not being very actively opposed by the mainstream of Christianity (the situation is analogous to the old Christian view of rape--the women were asking for it so, inessence, they got what they deserved. Many Christians feel just like that about homosexual people today, if they get beaten up then it's what they deserve). Working and doing outreach in the alternative community I get to see and talk to the victims of the violence in a way that you probably don't. I do not go to a Christian church in the city where I live. When I moved here I was contacted by a number of the churches and invited to attend and then I was specifically UNINVITED when the preachers found out that I am a transsexual--none of them have ever met me, but just on the strength of knowing that I was trans they did not want me in their churches. Each one did take the time to lecture me on my "evil lifestyle choice" however. Coincidentally, none of them knew anything about the science behind being transsexual--as you probably don't. In much the same way that Christians condemned mentally ill people, alcoholics, and people with birth defects, Christians are condemning transsexuals out of total ignorance despite the fact that the Bible has nothing to say about gender identity or changing gender presentation.

3) This leads to my next point, about the "War on Christianity." In the world, 160k christians were martyred last year (http://www.gordonconwell.edu/ockenga...resources.php).
I went to your site and didn't find anything about 160,000 Christians being martyred. Are you claiming that they were killed by gay people or what? Is this one of those things where everytime someone is killed a check is done and if they were Christian they get listed as a "martyr"? Give me some more input on what you're trying to say/prove/whatever please.

Lets not pretend that everyone loves Christianity.
I like the teachings of Jesus, but I don't see any of that being put into practice or even being advocated. Do you?


Yes its true that there are majority of self-labeled Christians in the US, but what does that mean? Secular humanist culture is constantly attacking the religion.
There are more than 2500 sects of Christians operating in the world today and they are attacking each other with far more vigor than the small minority of people who identify themselves as secular humanists.

If you watch TV and movies, you'll find many more examples of sex, violence, and intolerence than you will Christian programming. There are many more secular radio stations than Christian radio stations. And, yes, there are Christian groups arguing against inappropriate programming. On college campuses, I know that more people follow a secular lifestyle than follow the teachings of Jesus. There are also college groups trying to remedy this.
It's laughable to see you trying to pin popular culture on the influence of secular humanists when Christian polls indicate that more than 80% of the people in this country consider themselves Christians. But you are entirely correct when you note that more people are following a non-religious lifestyle. I've never seen anything to make me think that secular humanism is responsible for the sheep in your flock following a non-religious lifestyle. While looking to blame the secular humanists for the decline of our culture let's remember that in order to join the KKK you must first be a born-again Christian. Don't believe me? Go to their website and look it up. http://www.kkk.com/

I assume that the same-sex marriage issue just became a visble and easy target (read: election year issue) which people could attack.
Yes, you are probably correct, but why are we an easy target? Start with the hate in your holy book: Leviticus 20:13 for instance. How about it being easy because of a centuries long tradition of hate against minority groups:left-handed people, women, blacks, all other religions, other sects of Christians, and homosexual people. How can you possibly whine about a war on Christians after the things Christians have done and are doing to everybody else in the world? How many died in the Inquisition? How many women were burned at the stake during the witch trials across Europe? How many died in the Crusades? How many indigenous Americans were killed in the Christian invasion and genocide of the western hemispere? The Christian in the White House has lead us into a war that has killed more than 655,000 people in the Middle East, what part of Jesus teachings sanction that?

4) Which brings me to my final point. I think that you're soap-boxing for the issue is symptomatic of the Gay Rights Movement in general. Through the 1980s the movement spend a lot of time gaining visibility for its issues. Consequently, the movement has suffered in later years from over-exposure. If you asked the average person on the street, they would probobly say that there are more than ~6 million gays in America. Since gay culture has become trendy, mainstream media has influenced the spread of gay culture. As a result, gay culture and some misrepresentations of it make the situation appear greater than it is. Let's face it, more people watch Will & Grace than the 700 Club. That's not to say that gays ought to repress their culture, but rather that media has overexposed it.
I was silent on these issues for the first 50 years of my life and that didn't help. Now I speak out, I speak at Universities, meetings, continuing education classes, on sites like this, and any place else where I get the opportunity. Nothing has changed, Christians are still beating, raping, and killing us just like they have for centuries, they are still justifying it with the Bible, and apologists like you are still writing to me saying that it's not the "real" Christians that are responsible. You are not in a position to say who is or is not a "real" Christian since there are no universally accepted standards by which to judge a Christian's "real-ness".

I only know one (in my opinion) "real" Christian, a Mennonite preacher who talks the talk and walks the walk, and his worst enemies are the rest of the Christians in the area where he lives. You would not believe the storm of abuse this gentle man receives--including death threats.
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,354

United_States     United

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
I was silent on these issues for the first 50 years of my life and that didn't help. Now I speak out, I speak at Universities, meetings, continuing education classes, on sites like this, and any place else where I get the opportunity. Nothing has changed, Christians are still beating, raping, and killing us just like they have for centuries, they are still justifying it with the Bible, and apologists like you are still writing to me saying that it's not the "real" Christians that are responsible. You are not in a position to say who is or is not a "real" Christian since there are no universally accepted standards by which to judge a Christian's "real-ness".

I only know one (in my opinion) "real" Christian, a Mennonite preacher who talks the talk and walks the walk, and his worst enemies are the rest of the Christians in the area where he lives. You would not believe the storm of abuse this gentle man receives--including death threats.
YoU are one very scary individual: Nothing has changed, Christians are still beating, raping, and killing us just like they have for centuries, they are still justifying it with the Bible, and apologists like you are still writing to me saying that it's not the "real" Christians that are responsible.

Your hatred and rage need to be addressed in your own life. It is sheer insanity. The fact that you are willing to express this level of ferocious hate on a public forum is very frightening. I mean that quite seriously.
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
gnomon's Avatar
gnomon gnomon is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Bloom County
Posts: 353

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
Everything I can think of short of violence, which includes posting on sites like this even though a lot of people don't want to hear it. I also speak at Universities, correspond widely, contribute articles, donate money, live frugally, and I educate myself continuously. And you?

The idea is not that we can single-handedly stop any of the insanity, but rather that we do what we can, speak up, vote for sane people, try not to vote on the basis of fear or ignorance. The war against homosexual people in this country is nuts! They represent about 2% of the population and you'd think that they were taking over the country. Since Bush got into the White House and started pushing the radical right Christian agenda hate crimes against homosexual people have gone up every year. And now they are trying to enshrine religious discrimination in the Constitution.

The rise in fascism in this country is particularly scary, secret prisons, torture, and "disappearing" people is anti-thetical to what America has always stood for. Yes, of course there have been isolated instances of torture and such all down through American history, but the difference now is that it is being made LEGAL. If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention.
What an idiotic post. Please don't tell me you speak at universities because if this is all you know about human culture than you are doing no better than spreading disinformation for the sake of impressing your own ignorance. Certainly you are just overreacting a bit.

I believe the OP was about an airline and the wearing of trinkets and cloth.

Last edited by gnomon; 10-15-2006 at 02:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
IIIX's Avatar
IIIX IIIX is offline
Vice President
Baka Sensei

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 7,109

United     European_Union

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by Porras View Post
I don't think you understand what Christian means.
It is very easy to say that those you disagree with aren't true "christians".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Porras
Welcome to the ignore list.
I had and still have a good opinion of you and your posts, but that was just plain ridiculous. MareTranquility made fine points and countered yours; instead of debating, you used the "oh, that's so outrageous! I'm shocked!" tactic popularized by who-you-know. Put me on your ignore list as well if you want to... But let me remind you that, as MareTranquility said, it is fine to be a christian; but it isn't OK to deny the atrocities committed in the name of the Christ.

Just like it is fine to be a german but not fine to deny the holocaust or to say that those who perpetrated it "weren't true germans".




As for the OP: I don't think Tim understands the word "bigotry". The story is interesting; the line of defense that would most likely use british airways is that while the christian religion doesn't require people to wear crosses, muslims and sikhs are "required" to wear hijabs/turbans.
Quote:
British Airways says all jewellery and religious symbols on chains must be worn under the uniform.
But it makes an exception for Sikh turbans and Muslim hijabs because they cannot be covered up.
__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

Last edited by IIIX; 10-15-2006 at 02:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
YoU are one very scary individual: Nothing has changed, Christians are still beating, raping, and killing us just like they have for centuries, they are still justifying it with the Bible, and apologists like you are still writing to me saying that it's not the "real" Christians that are responsible.

Your hatred and rage need to be addressed in your own life. It is sheer insanity. The fact that you are willing to express this level of ferocious hate on a public forum is very frightening. I mean that quite seriously.
So, Tim, which part of this upsets you so? The beatings, rapes, and killings or the fact that I see Christian dogma as the justification?
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by gnomon View Post
What an idiotic post. Please don't tell me you speak at universities because if this is all you know about human culture than you are doing no better than spreading disinformation for the sake of impressing your own ignorance. Certainly you are just overreacting a bit.

I believe the OP was about an airline and the wearing of trinkets and cloth.
Convesations tend to ebb and flow, I have responded to the posts of others and to the ones directed at me.

You seem a trifle vague, exactly what is it that you are saying?
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,354

United_States     United

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
So, Tim, which part of this upsets you so? The beatings, rapes, and killings or the fact that I see Christian dogma as the justification?
There is not a single word of truth in your post - just madness. I do not use the ignore list anymore, because I always read posts whether I agree with them or not - but I will not have discussions with you due to the level of rage, bitterness and hatred, combined with the slander and false accusations.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
IIIX's Avatar
IIIX IIIX is offline
Vice President
Baka Sensei

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 7,109

United     European_Union

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

It looks like not only muslims tend to become violent when they see their religion being (constructively in our case) criticized ...


"Nah!! No muslim ever did anything bad! If one did, then it wasn't a real muslim!"
. Now, christians, imagine a muslim saying that; would he be convincing? I would think he is evading the issue of violence in his religion; and pretending it has nothing to do with it. I would think that, with such a reaction (closing his eyes), he is allowing the violence to continue.

I think the same way of christians who pretend that their religion has always did only good things.
__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,354

United_States     United

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIIX View Post
It looks like not only muslims tend to become violent when they see their religion criticized
You may strongly support the view that Christians are "murdering and raping" and rampaging thorugh the world, as Mare does - but you have to support those accusations with evidence. Otherwise your observations are worthless.
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
IIIX's Avatar
IIIX IIIX is offline
Vice President
Baka Sensei

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 7,109

United     European_Union

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
You may strongly support the view that Christians are "murdering and raping" and rampaging thorugh the world, as Mare does - but you have to support those accusations with evidence. Otherwise your observations are worthless.
MareTranquility did it already to a great extent. In case you didn't notice, "Christians" in her posts did not refer to the totality of christians but to "some christians". It is not difficult to find, even today, christian skinheads. I think that MareTranquility is going too far by suggesting that nothing have changed; christianism have been largely reduced to the private/spiritual sphere, unlike Islam. However, some sects of extremists remain active and dangerous.
__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

Last edited by IIIX; 10-15-2006 at 02:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
CowboyTed CowboyTed is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 1,536

   
Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

A I the only one who doesn't give a shit...
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
Tim Tim is offline
Vice President
Eisenhower Conservative

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: US
Posts: 8,354

United_States     United

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by IIIX View Post
MareTranquility did it already to a great extent. In case you didn't notice, "Christians" in her posts did not refer to the totality of christians but to "some christians".
*chuckle*

That is your response? So you believe that Christians are rampaging and raping and murdering throughout the world, and that all Christians are cupable, as she said? (Have you actually read her posts?) You are strongly supporting her views, as well as her arguments. The hatred of Christians in those posts refers to virtually all - that is very obvious and very open.

If you choose to label hundreds of millions of people in this way, that is your choice. I wonder, though, whether you really believe this kind of fanatical lunacy.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 10-15-2006
IIIX's Avatar
IIIX IIIX is offline
Vice President
Baka Sensei

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: Paris
Posts: 7,109

United     European_Union

Re: British Airways Forbids Crosses But Allows Muslim and Hindu Symbols

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim View Post
*chuckle*

That is your response? So you believe that Christians are rampaging and raping and murdering throughout the world, and that all Christians are cupable, as she said? (Have you actually read her posts?)
She said that only the negationnists among the christians are culpable; or those that are practicing the acts she described (of course).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim
If you choose to label hundres of millions of people in this way, that is your choice. I wonder, though, whether you really believe this kind of fanatical lunacy.
What you just wrote makes no sense whatsoever. You are invited to reread my post.
__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)
Reply With Quote
Reply