kinetic;858992]I disagree. I haven't received anything that invalidates how the biological design of the human species is contradictory to homosexual conduct.
More ridiculousness---- You can't invalidate something that doesn't exist.

That's because I haven't been able to get answers to my questions like, on what grounds would you deny three men from a marriage license or four brother from a marriage license.

RESPONSEActually you have. You just won't accept them. That question (or a very similar none) has been answered several time Once more: there is no resonable grounds provided they have fulfilled all other legal reqirements.

MUCH, Very much, and if you don't recognize that you are in big trouble. Besides, what you are stating is simply your opinion.

Militant homosexuals tend to be that way also - they want to force their morals on others. Atheists tend to be that way also. They too, like the militant homosexuals, want to force their morals on others.

Exactly. For example, no homosexual act has ever resulted in human offspring. IOW, homosexual behavior is scientifically and inherently sterile and fruitless. A genetic and evolutionary dead-end, if you will.

Trying to pretend that homosexual behavior is somehow "productive" or "useful" or "meaningful" is hopeless, because that pretension is foolishly attempting to validate something (ie., homosexual behavior) that is ultimately useless and thus the usefulness of homosexual behavior doesn't exist. There is no ultimate meaning to homosexual behavior. The meaning of homosexual behavior ultimately doesn't exist. It is selfish self-pleasuring; no more, no less.

Fair enough but only if you are able to refute any connection between genetics and homosexuality OR if you're able to refute evolution as a whole.

By the way, I would have said non-procreational. Homosexuals become sterile in the same way as heterosexuals. Using it in this context is nothing but value judgment that doesn't support the point you're trying to make.

As for fruitless? Well, good pun

But, the biological design of the human species being contradictory to homosexual conduct does exist. That's why I pose the question.

__________________
United We Stand.

Yes, but I doubt very much that Doniston can adequately and intectually respond to that very fair question, kinetic.

Intellectually honest responses are difficult to locate. I agree.

__________________
United We Stand.

I see that Kinetic gave you one of the "bigot" flags too.

__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.

Still waving the ol' "Bigot" flag I see.

__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.

Asking questions about the biological design of the human species being contradictory to homosexual conduct is not bigotry.

__________________
United We Stand.

I have two choices: spend hours cleaning this thread up or close the thread. Since I feel the conversation has run it's course, guess what option I went with...

__________________
New to the forum? Check out our Newbie's Guide!
Interested in supporting USPO? Click here!