NJ Gays Get Civil Unions Or Something - Page 7 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

segep soch · #91 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinetic

A mental affliction is the only explanation for the inconsistency between choosing a homosexual path and the biological design of the human species.

I don't suppose you'd be willing to share with us how many children you have?

doniston · #92 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

You are the only one claiming it's a psychological disorder, Kinetic. The rest of us know that it's just another variation in the human condition which harms no one and would be no different than any other harmless variation if it weren't for the religious bigots raining abuse on them. Keep raining, kid, your turn is coming...

VERY WELL SAID

doniston · #93 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinetic

Nobody has forced you to do anything.

OH???? have you lived in his skin?????

MareTranquility · #94 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

OH???? have you lived in his skin?????

Wow! It must be crowded being in your skin with Kinetic, Don, how do you cope? Must be a bit like demon-possession, isn't it? How do you exorcise him?

doniston · #95 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinetic

The fear you are discussing could be the homosexual's phobia or inability to have a relationship with the opposite sex.QUOTE=MareTranquility;853856]Like many religious folks you have "invincible ignorance" which can be characterized by the statement that you make quite often, "I don't know and I'm not going to find out!"

What have I missed? Name-calling is not making your point or convincing me of anything.

Just because I have another opinion regarding the importance of exclusive one-woman one-man marriages than you doen't mean I am fearful or ignorant.[/quote]

OK, you don't like that description. Then how pray tell would you describe a person who believes his opinion is the only possible one? and will not even consider another. A bigot?, arrogance personified?, a self annoted God???? The Pope???what? Because you ARE that person. and why I have referred to you as the new age "Eugene McCarthy".

doniston · #96 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

Wow! It must be crowded being in your skin with Kinetic, Don, how do you cope? Must be a bit like demon-possession, isn't it? How do you exorcise him?

I'm sorry but I don't understand your post. I fear you have either misunderstood what I asked or to whom and/or about what I was asking.

MareTranquility · #97 (**permalink**) 11-18-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

I'm sorry but I don't understand your post. I fear you have either misunderstood what I asked or to whom and/or about what I was asking.

Sorry, I thought that you were asking Kinetic if he had lived in YOUR skin and thus knew you, but now I see that I was mistaken--it just tickled me to think of you and Kinetic growling around in your skin like two bobcats in a sack.

It was in reference to your comment to Kinetic: "OH???? have you lived in his skin?????"

So I responded: "Wow! It must be crowded being in your skin with Kinetic, Don, how do you cope? Must be a bit like demon-possession, isn't it? How do you exorcise him?"

doniston · #98 (**permalink**) 11-19-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

Sorry, I thought that you were asking Kinetic if he had lived in YOUR skin and thus knew you, but now I see that I was mistaken--it just tickled me to think of you and Kinetic growling around in your skin like two bobcats in a sack.

It was in reference to your comment to Kinetic: "OH???? have you lived in his skin?????"

So I responded: "Wow! It must be crowded being in your skin with Kinetic, Don, how do you cope? Must be a bit like demon-possession, isn't it? How do you exorcise him?"

Yeh, I guess that would be a comical image. But you had ME puzzled.

If that were indeed the case, he would be shackles and definitely headed for the poky or loony-bin. As I have said before, I think he is DANGEROUS.

kinetic · #99 (**permalink**) 11-19-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

You are very afraid of many things and that fairly shouts out from the posts you make. If you weren't afraid you wouldn't have to be raining abuse on people you don't know for things you don't know about, while trying to support your diatribes with pseudo-scientific "wizdumb" instead of learning about the things you fear.

I am unafraid. I am not raining on anyone. There are no diatribes or psuedoscience offered. You are factually incorrect.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

You are like a person running so fast to get away from the boogey man that you don't have time to look over your shoulder and see that there isn't any boogey man chasing you. Look at the stuff you write about: fear of not enough tax payers, fear of homosexual people, fear of transsexual people (when you don't know anything about transsexual people), fear of socialism, communism, fascism, and probably ismism too.

My opposition to Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Islammunism and Anarchy is validated by American history and the fact that Marxism never works and nearly always results in Totalitarianism, War or Genocide.

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

I don't know of a single good thing to come out of fundamental religion--anybody's fundamental religion. It's all based on fear and ignorance which leads to violence. Bear in mind that gay people are not ganging up on heteros or Christians and beating or killing them, gays are not starting wars, instituting torture, or trying to take away your Constitutional rights.

I have never proposed anything but keeping one-woman one-man marriages as state Consititutions have been Amended to from resulting votes.

Real science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses. The biological design of the human species is not psuedoscience but reasonable and rational justification for one-woman one-man couples.

doniston · #**100** (**permalink**) 11-19-2006

[quote=kinetic;854676

Real science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses.
QUOTE] You say this and repeat it over and over and over again. But repeatition doesn't make it so.

None of those issues support One, or ANY kind of marriage moreso than another

kinetic · #**101** (**permalink**) 11-19-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

You say this and repeat it over and over and over again. But repeatition doesn't make it so.

I wouldn't repeat science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses if it weren't so.

MareTranquility · #**102** (**permalink**) 11-19-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinetic

I am unafraid. I am not raining on anyone. There are no diatribes or psuedoscience offered. You are factually incorrect.My opposition to Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Islammunism and Anarchy is validated by American history and the fact that Marxism never works and nearly always results in Totalitarianism, War or Genocide.I have never proposed anything but keeping one-woman one-man marriages as state Consititutions have been Amended to from resulting votes.
Real science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses. The biological design of the human species is not psuedoscience but reasonable and rational justification for one-woman one-man couples.

You are one of the frightened sheeple bleating in the wilderness. Sucks to be you. Sorry.

kinetic · #**103** (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

You are one of the frightened sheeple bleating in the wilderness.

There isn't anything frightening about the fact that science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses.

MareTranquility · #**104** (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by kinetic

There isn't anything frightening about the fact that science, history, math, and biology support only one-woman one-man couples and no other combination of individuals for marriage licenses.

You are so terrified of a tiny minority of the American population that you are willing to suppress your fear of fascism in order to punish the people who frighten you. You are running scared, so scared that you can't even slow down enough to look back and discover that no one is chasing you except your shadow. Sucks to be you, Kin, but only you can stop and confront your fear.

kinetic · #**105** (**permalink**) 11-21-2006

Quote:

Originally Posted by MareTranquility

You are so terrified of a tiny minority of the American population that you are willing to suppress your fear of fascism in order to punish the people who frighten you. You are running scared, so scared that you can't even slow down enough to look back and discover that no one is chasing you except your shadow.

I have explained my one and only fear numerously.

You have misinterpreted me. This isn't about fear but protective of one-woman one-man traditional marriage where the bulk of future taxpayers come from.

There are no benefits from homosexual conduct and nothing to reward let alone with a license.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode