Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006
chathamfarmer chathamfarmer is offline
County Council Member

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: chatham county nc
Posts: 297

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by segep soch View Post
Well you sure don't fit the stereotype.
Depends on the sterotype. I do fit the rural hayseed sterotype. There are several gay and lesbian couples in the area that farm. Here is a poem I wrote about it. A little off topic but I think it might make people laugh .

Wally and Joe live together on the farm
Gun rack in thier truck tattoos on thier arms.
Card bearin' members of the NRA
Got a target set up on a bale of hay.
Wally re-enacts with the Rebel flag
Joe knocks 'em dead with his Dolly Parton drag.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down home Southern country queer redencks.

Then there's Sally and Susy right next door
Two bio-diesel dykes with a 4X4
They grow organic Angus and free-range bird
Got every Indigo album and sing every word.
They read Backwoods Home with Massad Ayoob.
They're boat Boudicca's got an Evinrude.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.

We live in trailers we got big dogs.
We shovel horse shit and we slop the hogs.
No champagne brunch with the HRC
A long-neck bottle's good enough for me.
Can't shove me in a closet gotta understand
I got a 12 guage Mossberg and a steady hand.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
We're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by chathamfarmer View Post
Depends on the sterotype. I do fit the rural hayseed sterotype. There are several gay and lesbian couples in the area that farm. Here is a poem I wrote about it. A little off topic but I think it might make people laugh .

Wally and Joe live together on the farm
Gun rack in thier truck tattoos on thier arms.
Card bearin' members of the NRA
Got a target set up on a bale of hay.
Wally re-enacts with the Rebel flag
Joe knocks 'em dead with his Dolly Parton drag.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down home Southern country queer redencks.

Then there's Sally and Susy right next door
Two bio-diesel dykes with a 4X4
They grow organic Angus and free-range bird
Got every Indigo album and sing every word.
They read Backwoods Home with Massad Ayoob.
They're boat Boudicca's got an Evinrude.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.

We live in trailers we got big dogs.
We shovel horse shit and we slop the hogs.
No champagne brunch with the HRC
A long-neck bottle's good enough for me.
Can't shove me in a closet gotta understand
I got a 12 guage Mossberg and a steady hand.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
We're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.
Very good! Can I forward your poem to friends with your pen-name as the author? Or would you pm me with your real name so that I could give you actual credit?
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006
segep soch's Avatar
segep soch segep soch is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: rek'woy
Posts: 529

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by chathamfarmer View Post
Depends on the sterotype. I do fit the rural hayseed sterotype. There are several gay and lesbian couples in the area that farm. Here is a poem I wrote about it. A little off topic but I think it might make people laugh .

Wally and Joe live together on the farm
Gun rack in thier truck tattoos on thier arms.
Card bearin' members of the NRA
Got a target set up on a bale of hay.
Wally re-enacts with the Rebel flag
Joe knocks 'em dead with his Dolly Parton drag.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down home Southern country queer redencks.

Then there's Sally and Susy right next door
Two bio-diesel dykes with a 4X4
They grow organic Angus and free-range bird
Got every Indigo album and sing every word.
They read Backwoods Home with Massad Ayoob.
They're boat Boudicca's got an Evinrude.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
They're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.

We live in trailers we got big dogs.
We shovel horse shit and we slop the hogs.
No champagne brunch with the HRC
A long-neck bottle's good enough for me.
Can't shove me in a closet gotta understand
I got a 12 guage Mossberg and a steady hand.

Wearin' Carhart and Wrangler and drivin' old wrecks
We're down-home Southern country queer rednecks.
That was simply awesome. Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 11-11-2006
Captain Trips Captain Trips is offline
President
Damage Inc.

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Charon
Posts: 12,890

United_States     Antarctica

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benjamin View Post
While I support equal rights, I have some concerns about the legal recognition of gay unions. I personally think it's too big of a change right now, and I don't want the defnition of the family to continue to be changed up. It's a losing issue right now, although I think the eventual application of the 14th to gays will happen.
No, it won't. The minority status they think they can acheive won't happen either.

Because, Minority status has been determined by the U.S. supreme court on three criteria:

1. Economic deprivation: No. Those engaged in the homosexual "lifestyle" are among the most advantaged people in the U.S. On average, they have a higher per capita income than heterosexuals and higher household incomes. [ Wall Street Journal, Feb. 10, 1989, and New York Times, Aug. 22, 1990 ]

2. Political powerlessness: No. Homosexuals demonstrate great influential political power far beyond their actual numbers. The human rights campaign fund has annually donated millions of dollars to candidates, more than most other non-corporate PACs [The Economist, Apr. 24, 1993]. Media news and entertainment coverage is overwhelmingly favorable.

3. Immutable characteristics: No. Minority groups share unchangeable, benign, non-behavioral traits such as race, ethnicity, disability, or national origin. Homosexuals are the only group to claim minority status based on behavior. SEXUAL behaviour.

Forget it. Not going to happen for "them".
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thane View Post
No, it won't. The minority status they think they can acheive won't happen either.

Because, Minority status has been determined by the U.S. supreme court on three criteria:

1. Economic deprivation: No. Those engaged in the homosexual "lifestyle" are among the most advantaged people in the U.S. On average, they have a higher per capita income than heterosexuals and higher household incomes. [ Wall Street Journal, Feb. 10, 1989, and New York Times, Aug. 22, 1990 ]

2. Political powerlessness: No. Homosexuals demonstrate great influential political power far beyond their actual numbers. The human rights campaign fund has annually donated millions of dollars to candidates, more than most other non-corporate PACs [The Economist, Apr. 24, 1993]. Media news and entertainment coverage is overwhelmingly favorable.

3. Immutable characteristics: No. Minority groups share unchangeable, benign, non-behavioral traits such as race, ethnicity, disability, or national origin. Homosexuals are the only group to claim minority status based on behavior. SEXUAL behaviour.

Forget it. Not going to happen for "them".
Lack of research coupled with a weakness in reading comprehension complicated by an tendency towards echolalia makes your arguments seem even more ignorant and bigoted than even you probably intend them to be.
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006
Captain Trips Captain Trips is offline
President
Damage Inc.

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Charon
Posts: 12,890

United_States     Antarctica

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
Lack of research coupled with a weakness in reading comprehension complicated by an tendency towards echolalia makes your arguments seem even more ignorant and bigoted than even you probably intend them to be.
Ahhhh. Is THAT it.

Glad you could straighten that out for me. Guess I better work on my "reading comprehension".

Guess what buddy ? You won't get what you want with this persistent attack on my "reading comprehension". Yes, it's very obvious what you're trying to get.

My "arguments" may seem "ignorant and bigoted" to you. I'm sorry, I can't help you. Take it up with the Supreme Court. See what gains you attain by calling THEM "ignorant and bigoted"
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thane View Post
Ahhhh. Is THAT it.

Glad you could straighten that out for me. Guess I better work on my "reading comprehension".

Guess what buddy ? You won't get what you want with this persistent attack on my "reading comprehension". Yes, it's very obvious what you're trying to get.

My "arguments" may seem "ignorant and bigoted" to you. I'm sorry, I can't help you. Take it up with the Supreme Court. See what gains you attain by calling THEM "ignorant and bigoted"
The Supreme Court outlawed slavery eventually, ratified women's right to vote and own property, acknowledged that racial discrimination was wrong, ended bans on interracial marriage, and declared sodomy laws unconstitutional. Despite George the Monkey's attempts to pack the Court with religious crazies, I suspect that they will get around to us eventually. It's instructive that the upcoming generation of kids overwhelmingly supports homosexuals having full legal rights--you and your ilk are dinosaurs dying out slowly and all the crap you are bleating about is nothing more than the death rattle of another generation of ignorant, fearful people.
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006
Captain Trips Captain Trips is offline
President
Damage Inc.

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Charon
Posts: 12,890

United_States     Antarctica

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by MareTranquility View Post
The Supreme Court outlawed slavery eventually, ratified women's right to vote and own property, acknowledged that racial discrimination was wrong, ended bans on interracial marriage, and declared sodomy laws unconstitutional. Despite George the Monkey's attempts to pack the Court with religious crazies, I suspect that they will get around to us eventually. It's instructive that the upcoming generation of kids overwhelmingly supports homosexuals having full legal rights--you and your ilk are dinosaurs dying out slowly and all the crap you are bleating about is nothing more than the death rattle of another generation of ignorant, fearful people.
Ya, ok

The venom you continue to display with your use of fancy words and language meant to impress, shows how pissed you are that society continues rejecting your perverse ideas and "lifestyle".

Continue being pissed or move on buddy. You don't always get what you want in life, that's just the hardcore reality. If you still haven't learned this I certainly can't help you, you'll learn it in your own time.
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 11-12-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thane View Post
Ya, ok

The venom you continue to display with your use of fancy words and language meant to impress, shows how pissed you are that society continues rejecting your perverse ideas and "lifestyle".

Continue being pissed or move on buddy. You don't always get what you want in life, that's just the hardcore reality. If you still haven't learned this I certainly can't help you, you'll learn it in your own time.
I find it interesting that you object to my proper use of the English language. Can't keep up?
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
offspring13 offspring13 is offline
County Executive

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 324

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMadsen
Marriage is surrounded by its own set of requirements that can be seen as forms of discrimination simply by being defined (age, kinship or consanguinity (sp.?), number of partners, citizenship and residency, mental capacity, veneral diseases in some cases etc.).
Age and mental capacity are subject to entering into any contract. Of course citizenship counts because non-legals cannot enter into a contract of our country. Veneral diseases? I've never heard of this and don't see legal grounds for banning this either. Incest? I see no legal reason for banning it. Number of partners? By the nature of the contract, it cannot sustain more than 2 partners unless altered dramaticly. This shows why government shouldn't get involved in the situation to begin with.


Quote:
Originally Posted by thane
3. Immutable characteristics: No. Minority groups share unchangeable, benign, non-behavioral traits such as race, ethnicity, disability, or national origin. Homosexuals are the only group to claim minority status based on behavior. SEXUAL behaviour.
Being gay, or being attracted to the same sex, is an immutable characteristic. Unless of course, you want to claim that you made the choice at some point to be heterosexual. Behavior, or actual sex, doesn't enter into the situation.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by offspring13 View Post
Age and mental capacity are subject to entering into any contract. Of course citizenship counts because non-legals cannot enter into a contract of our country. Veneral diseases? I've never heard of this and don't see legal grounds for banning this either. Incest? I see no legal reason for banning it. Number of partners? By the nature of the contract, it cannot sustain more than 2 partners unless altered dramaticly. This shows why government shouldn't get involved in the situation to begin with.


...
Just a tiny FYI:

"Citizen" vs. "non-legal": you can be a legal resident and be entitled to marry in the US. I ought to know.

Mass.gov regarding STD's & marriage licensing

Washington State regarding STD'S & Marriage licensing

just a couple to peruse.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
SMadsen SMadsen is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 2,995

    Denmark

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by offspring13 View Post
Age and mental capacity are subject to entering into any contract. Of course citizenship counts because non-legals cannot enter into a contract of our country. Veneral diseases? I've never heard of this and don't see legal grounds for banning this either. Incest? I see no legal reason for banning it. Number of partners? By the nature of the contract, it cannot sustain more than 2 partners unless altered dramaticly. This shows why government shouldn't get involved in the situation to begin with.
I think you misread my reply. I was responding to how anti-discrimination laws would influence legalization of same-sex marriage. My point is that they don't have any influence but that especially one type of discrimination law does, namely the anti-sodomy laws (which haven't been repealed in all states but "merely" put out of effect by Lawrence v. Texas). I only used incest to say that it isn't technically different to police a sodomy law than it is to police any other law concerning prohibited sexual acts, - as for example incest. But politically, it's a very different beast.

This had nothing to do with the government having created benefits for marriage and therefore being a contractual party of marriage. If your view is that government should remove itself as a party in the marital arrangement between two people, it must also cease to grant such an arrangement any benefit, right and privilege.
Reply With Quote
  #73 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
Captain Trips Captain Trips is offline
President
Damage Inc.

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Charon
Posts: 12,890

United_States     Antarctica

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by offspring13 View Post
Being gay, or being attracted to the same sex, is an immutable characteristic. Unless of course, you want to claim that you made the choice at some point to be heterosexual. Behavior, or actual sex, doesn't enter into the situation.
"There are a lot of studies out that show 66% of homosexuals that desire to change have done so. And yet there are a lot of psychiatrists who will not treat a person who comes in saying, `I'm a homosexual, and I don't like it and I want to change,' and they will not treat them. And there are some in fact who will tell them that you just need to adjust to the fact that you're a homosexual, and I'll help you adjust to it." [ Dr. James Mallory in ."Coming Out: Breaking Free from Homosexuality" ]



Hmmmm... So "being gay" ISN'T an immutable characteristic. No, it isn't.


Just because some character on the internet who calls him/herself "offspring13" says it IS doesn't make it so.

"If homosexuality were a trait determined entirely by a person's genes, one would expect 100 percent of the identical (monozygotic or MZ) twins of homosexuals to also be homosexual. Yet this is not the case; indeed, `what is most intriguing' about the twins studies to Byne and Parsons `is the large proportion of MZ twins who were discordant for homosexuality despite sharing not only their genes but also their prenatal and familial environments." [ William Byne and Bruce Parsons, "Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised," Archives of General Psychiatry, March 1993, 50:230, cited in Peter Sprigg and Timothy Dailey, Getting it Straight: What the Research Shows About Homosexuality (Washington, DC: Family Research council, 2004), 9 ]

"Virtually all of the evidence argues against there being a determinative physiological causal factor, and I know of no researcher who believes that such a determinative factor exists." [ Steven Goldberg, When Wish Replaces Thought: Why So Much of What you Believe is False (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1992), quoted in NARTH Bulletin, Volume 2, Number 3, Dec. 1994, 5 ]
Reply With Quote
  #74 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
HammerShot's Avatar
HammerShot HammerShot is offline
Active Citizen
new law = lost freedom

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Southeastern United States
Posts: 86

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

So, Thane, you are basically arguing that homosexuals should not be allowed to get married because doctors say they aren't really happy with being homosexual? Just because it's not an immutable characteristic? Or are you just trying to prove that homosexuality isn't an immutable characteristic? Could you please explain what you are trying to say?
__________________
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen."
-Samuel Adams
Reply With Quote
  #75 (permalink)  
Old 11-13-2006
MareTranquility MareTranquility is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,426

   
Re: Widespread Opposition to Same-Sex "marriage"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thane View Post
"There are a lot of studies out that show 66% of homosexuals that desire to change have done so. And yet there are a lot of psychiatrists who will not treat a person who comes in saying, `I'm a homosexual, and I don't like it and I want to change,' and they will not treat them. And there are some in fact who will tell them that you just need to adjust to the fact that you're a homosexual, and I'll help you adjust to it." [ Dr. James Mallory in ."Coming Out: Breaking Free from Homosexuality" ]
[b]Hmmmm... So "being gay" ISN'T an immutable characteristic. No, it isn't.B]
Just because some character on the internet who calls im/herself "offspring13" says it IS doesn't make it so."If homosexuality were a trait determined entirely by a person's genes, one would expect 100 percent of the identical (monozygotic or MZ) twins of homosexuals to also be homosexual. Yet this is not the case; indeed, `what is most intriguing' about the twins studies to Byne and Parsons `is the large proportion of MZ twins who were discordant for homosexuality despite sharing not only their genes but also their prenatal and familial environments." [ William Byne and Bruce Parsons, "Human Sexual Orientation: The Biologic Theories Reappraised," Archives of General Psychiatry, March 1993, 50:230, cited in Peter Sprigg and Timothy Dailey, Getting it Straight: What the Research Shows About Homosexuality (Washington, DC: Family Research council, 2004), 9 ]
"Virtually all of the evidence argues against there being a determinative physiological causal factor, and I know of no researcher who believes that such a determinative factor exists." [ Steven Goldberg, When Wish Replaces Thought: Why So Much of What you Believe is False (Buffalo, N.Y.: Prometheus Books, 1992), quoted in NARTH Bulletin, Volume 2, Number 3, Dec. 1994, 5 ]
Try posting from this century please, Thane, most of us don't believe in phlogiston or phrenology anymore either.
__________________
The apocalypse is coming... we're gonna need more ammo.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes