Missing the number by a factor of 1,000 is hardly a typo. A typo would've been something like "300,000,00".

I'm not judgin', I'm just sayin'...

__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"

There are very few countries in the world which do not welcome foreign investment with open arms.
Most countries that do have such limitations are very poor socialist banana republics that want to stay poor.

"There are no restrictions to foreigners owning property anywhere in the USA"
Property in Usa - Buyers Guide

I find it amusing that some pro free economy people in here ( not you Traveler )
are presenting opinions that are very socialist and do not understand how free economy works at all.

There are so gigantic amount of foreign investments in US that
even the slightest hint that US government would not recognize their ownership,
would totally collapse US economy as
all the astronomical amount of investments would be pulled away from US.

The purpose to have visas for investors is controlling the people, not for controlling the property.

There are no problems to buy property from US even if the buyer has never set foot in US soil.

.

Nope. It's just not something I desire. I guess this is why I've never (and will never) entered politics.

Ah, yes. That's exactly what I said. How astute of you.





You realize, of course, that those claims have long been disproven. There's several threads on it here.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

I brain spasmed and added an extra group of zeros. It was a typo - I was thinking in groups of 3.

Whoopty fucking doo.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Yes we all know you prefer to base your opinions of people strictly on whacked out liberal news sources. Of course were I as horrible judge of character as liberals i'd be looking for someone to tell me what to think as well.

Varus

And, of course, you can back up your accusation by demonstrating where I've said anything to indicate that I use "liberal news sources" to make my opinions for me?


I'm still waiting for Traveller to do the same; he hasn't found anything either.

It's time for both of you to put up or shut up.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Complete bs...everyone knows Clinton refused to deal with the islamic issue and in fact refused Bin Laden when offered by the Sudanese. H*ll Clinton said so himself. You people are dellusional.

From Clintons own words;

Since this statement Clinton has repeatedly backtracked and denied the offer. He clearly states that he had committed no crime against america so he was concerned about being able to hold him on a legal basis. This is Clinton, remember, the big liar. He could should have gone after Bin Laden if he thought he was a threat.

But hey you liberals keep living the lie. Clinton was directly responsible for 911.

Varus

Proof? Are you serious? You've done nothing but espouse rabid liberal partisan rhetoric. All we have to do to know where you stand on an issue is listen to leahy or pelosi 5 minutes.

Varus

No. Those who planned and carried out the attack are directly responsible. You shouldn't lay blame on President Clinton.

But, you've admitted that you only assign what you believe "liberals" are thinking. Have you actually read anything I've written?

Maybe you can find something I wrote that clearly matches something Leahy or Pelosi has said.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Clintion followed the law. I know that you don't like the law, but we live in a society based on the rule of law, even when it's inconvenient.

It's nice that you blame Clinton for 9/11, but remember that the W Adminstration was warned explicitly about the possibility of attack, and instead chose to ignore it.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

President Bush isn't responsible for 911 either.

Well, we do agree, actually, that the people who hijacked those planes are responsible.



Either that or the aliens with their death rays.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

LAW!!!??? You mean like Clinton granting pardons to convicted embezzlers and coke dealers? Don't give me this crap about Clinton respecting the law because we both know he could care less.

W was not warned explicitly and to say so is nothing more than rabid partisanship. Oh and american laws don't apply to suspected non-citizens intent on attacking the country. But hey you libs have been trying to give radical muslims access to the US constitution for years; nothings changed.

Varus

I think you'll find that "Clinton" is a right wing code word for "You have won the argument, I have no way to counter your logic without looking like a complete idiot".
Whenever it appears in a post by a right wing poster, it means they have conceded the point, and proclaimed you the victor.

__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address