No Goober, it means we know how bad of a President you're cheerleading for.

He was the first President to be impeached in how many years?

He lost a Dem controlled House that left you guys in the minority fo 12 years.

He was handed Bin Laden on a plate and turned him away.

He lobbed missles into the Mid East....and missed!

He basically gave Bush the Presidency by doing what he did, why is it you love this guy so much? He was a great help to the GOP and he effectively helped with Bush's re-election in 04 by not campaigning for Kerry...by rights you should hate this guy!

I see what you mean, Goober.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Of course you do!

And this of course is within the rules it:

Seizing Property from Illegals

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Edited it to the specific post in question.

I specifically refuted his point, which is done consistently to him. Despite his decision to ignore facts, he regularly spouts his mistruths. In the common vernacular, he's full of shit.

Now, if you've got something real to discuss, please bring it to the table.

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

Right, so you lose the argument so you resort to saying Varus is full of shit.

Hey goober notice how he didn't have to mention the word defeat to show that he's lost the debate?

Please, explain how confronting (yet another) mistruth with facts is "losing the argument."

__________________
When they come a wull staun ma groon
Staun ma groon al nae be afraid
Thoughts awe hame tak awa ma fear
Sweat an bluid hide ma veil awe tears

I'd be willing to bet going to another country ILLEGALLY would not be something you're likely to do though.

Anyway, the belongings WERE earned illegally. They WERE earned while in the COMMISSION OF A CRIME. It is against the law to be here illegally. Just by being here they are commiting a crime. But even further, it is against THE LAW to work in America without providing proof of citizenship, unless you have some sort of work visa, which illegals generally do not have. It does NOT absolve the guilt of the illegal if the employer fails to ask for proof of citizenship, in that case BOTH not one or the other have commited a crime.

A drug dealer's PROPERTY is fair game when they get caught. It is considered ill-gotten gains through profits achieved during illegal activity. There is absolutely no difference, the illegals are commiting crime coming up here stealing jobs from legal citizens. They should lose EVERYTHING they have, it should be sold at public auctioned. THEN (they wanted to work in America) they should be slapped into the nearest penitentiary for a duration decided by some AMERICAN court and put on a work farm until they've repaid the American people that which they stole from us.

I believe actually that this has in fact happened. Maybe somebody who enjoys doing research can look it up. I thought I heard something about Walmart having to dish out some money because they'd been found to have been employing illegals.

I disagree with your logic. You appear to be suggesting that if our constitution does not grant an illegal alien the rights of our citizens then no law whatsoever can pertain to the illegal?

I don't know what more to say other than I just can't fathom how you make that work in your mind.

An illegal alien, by stepping foot here, has made it clear automatically that they have a reckless disregard for our laws. The second they cross that border they've become a criminal according to our laws. There is nothing in the constitution that can be read to intend that the hands of law enforcement officials should be tied if the criminal happens to not be from here. That would be just plain silly.