Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
iamwhatiseem iamwhatiseem is offline
Moderator
Pays too much in taxes

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,587

United_States     Indiana

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
From my (admittedly limited) understanding, it is legal to charge different prices depending on quantity ordered, or to offer certain discounts for certain reasons. As far as I'm aware, it's generally illegal to determine price based on customer's ability to pay in a lot of instances. I remember working retail in a Radio Shack and learning something about that, though the details escape me.
Well it's like this - you can call it "incentive pricing"...getting paid on time and regularly is absolutely a value. Late Debt creates cash flow problems, and if clients are "slow pay" meaning they take as long as 3 months to pay - this creates a financial hardship...thus they are charged more.

Hospitals are like my business, an "unsecured creditor" - and unsecured creditors have significantly less chance of getting bad debt back if/when it comes down to not getting paid than secured debtors like Radio Shack etc. who sells their "loans" to a financial institutions.
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by iamwhatiseem View Post
Well it's like this - you can call it "incentive pricing"...getting paid on time and regularly is absolutely a value. Late Debt creates cash flow problems, and if clients are "slow pay" meaning they take as long as 3 months to pay - this creates a financial hardship...thus they are charged more.

Hospitals are like my business, an "unsecured creditor" - and unsecured creditors have significantly less chance of getting bad debt back if/when it comes down to not getting paid than secured debtors like Radio Shack etc. who sells their "loans" to a financial institutions.
So were you under the same impression I was?, that it is the uninsureds that are charged more and not the reverse?
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
iamwhatiseem's Avatar
iamwhatiseem iamwhatiseem is offline
Moderator
Pays too much in taxes

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Indiana
Posts: 12,587

United_States     Indiana

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JHC View Post
So were you under the same impression I was?, that it is the uninsureds that are charged more and not the reverse?
Hey your right!...OK then the hospital has it backwards....course the matrix of their finances are unique to the average business...their bad debt is substantially higher than most everyone else....course their profit margins are also.
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
Certainly you don't think that all people who have heath insurance have or can afford that level of coverage, do you? You must be a UAW member. Obviously you don't pay for that yourself.

If you think I am kidding you, see what your insurance paid the hospital and then call for that cash price. I would say you would be shocked, but seeing as you have the rolls royce plan, I guess you wouldn't care either way.
I, too, have the "rolls royce" plan but found out years ago that prices were different because I had elective surgery that wasn't covered by my insurance and needed pre-op blood work so I paid for it myself. I knew in advance the approximate cost since I'd had the same blood work in the past and was very surprised that not only was it cheaper with self-pay but I also got a discount for paying in full the same day.
I think that insurance companies should re-negotiate their prices and then pass the savings down to the insured in the form of lower premiums!!!
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is online now
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 27,073

United_States     Florida

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

I'm surprised at some of these stories.

I know my plan positively rapes the lab on bloodwork. I have a test done regularly that the lab bills ~200.00 for.

My plan pays them less than 8 dollars.

I pay them nothing.

Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,286

United_States     Texas

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattLarson View Post
I'm surprised at some of these stories.

I know my plan positively rapes the lab on bloodwork. I have a test done regularly that the lab bills ~200.00 for.

My plan pays them less than 8 dollars.

I pay them nothing.

Matt
They taking apps where you work? You too Impugn.
__________________
Mr. Obama, please release the UFO files!
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
chassisman's Avatar
chassisman chassisman is offline
Secretary of State
poof! you're gone (2)

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: bible belt
Posts: 8,286

United_States     Texas

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Insurance is the biggest financial liabilty that I face. Between the cars, the RV, the real estate, and the health care ins, etc, the total is staggering!
And the great thing is that much of it is mandated.
__________________
Mr. Obama, please release the UFO files!
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2008
JHC's Avatar
JHC JHC is offline
President
a cold, cold woman... and junebug sympathizer

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Florida US
Posts: 10,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
Insurance is the biggest financial liabilty that I face. Between the cars, the RV, the real estate, and the health care ins, etc, the total is staggering!
And the great thing is that much of it is mandated.
I hear ya!

But health insurance is in a class of its own. It's nothing like all the other insurance you carry. This is one of my biggest beefs with all the presidential candidates except Edwards. They know what I know, they're just afraid to say it. We need to do away with health insurance rather than mandate it. (Grrrrrr...like Obama and Clinton are pushing).

Rant:
Basic health care is a necessity for a productive economy. No moral judgment necessary here. Tax away and make it happen.

Health INSURANCE, if it were adopted as part of some hybrid system, should be for catastrophic events - just like all other insurance. Colds and flu, aches and pains, immunizations, birth control and erectile disfunction, and child birth are ordinary relatively predictable and usually minor events, (no loss of life, limb or job), which folks ought to be able to afford anyway.
Insurance is to protect you in the event of some huge unforeseen disaster (like my Crohn's diagnosis and my husbands heart condition ).
If health insurance were treated like regular insurance, we'd be able to afford it.
If health insurance is used to pay for every sniffle, you are paying some middle man to process paperwork and pressure the doctors to treat you the cheapest way possible...not the best. And no one cares how much it costs if its covered by "insurance". Right? All of this adds to the expense of health care - not just health insurance.

I pay over a grand a month for COBRA and when its gone...I'm fucked. There is not an insurance company in the entire country that would take either myself or my husband. My doctor knows this and it weighs in every treatment decision including running very serious risks of chemotherapy while I'm insured even if it might be a premature risk. I postponed it once before. I'd like to try one more option but I'm out of time.

So, I did not represent myself completely honestly but it was out of respect for Chassis. I have recently spent a great deal of time pricing labs and hospitals, (it is an outpatient procedure I'll repeat over and over and closely monitor via regular blood work at the lab), both under COBRA (United HealthCare), and uninsured. I have not seen an instance when the price to uninsureds is actually less than the price charged to UHC.
**Note**If UHC is your insurance company, you can logon and find out exactly how much is charged for particular procedures and drugs - they're trying to encourage people to shop I guess.

Thus, I start in 11 days. I'll get as much as I can before the insurance runs out. Then, I guess I'll wait until I have to go to the emergency room and have my intestines removed...and YOU will pay the bill.

Thats pretty much how it works.
__________________
...the government...is caving in...with their specious arguments couched in the...language of civil rights law, and that the churches ... likewise crumbling to...rhetoric which is nothing but heretical sophistry -- ~F Phelps
Platitudes like the one you offer are no different - and no less incorrect - than the jackass part-time Christian who says, "I'm going to heaven because I'm nice to people." It so misses the point.~Impugn
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 01-26-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Basically, this is price discrimination. Third degree, to be precise. Companies do it all the time, and not just with health care.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 01-28-2008
kramer's Avatar
kramer kramer is offline
18* & 1

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 903

   
Re: Shouldn't this be illegal?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chassisman View Post
It is common practice for hospitals and other health care providers to have two or more prices for the same service or procedure. For instance, a MRI might cost $1000 cash for someone with no heath insurance, but if you have insurance, the same exact MRI will be billed at a much higher price. The insurance co and the HCP usually have a contracted price that they go by.

Here is a scenario:

A normally heathy person requires a MRI and has insurance with a $2500 annual deductable. The contracted price is $2700. The patient would have to pay $2500 as well as a portion of the $200 balance.

The hospital offers the same procedure to the uninsured for $1000 cash.


Now if you are normally healthy and willing to risk a little, it would make good sense to pay the $1000 cash even though you have insurance. But wait, they won't let you do that!

Why is this legal ??? It actually discriminates against those who are insured. When people on public assistance get food stampss, they don't adjust the price of the food as well, now do they?

Opinions , please.
I need a MRI for my shoulder and was told it'll cost my insurance $1500.00 if they pay for it vs $500.00 if I pay for it. I'm almost tempted to contact my insurance Co. and tell them I'll pay for it if you send me a check for $800.00.
__________________
“It's time to admit that public education operates like a planned economy, a bureaucratic system in which everybody's role is spelled out in advance and there are few incentives for innovation and productivity. It's no surprise that our school system doesn't improve; it more resembles the communist economy than our own market economy."
Albert Shanker, former president of the American Federation of Teachers
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online