Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

View Poll Results: Which position best describes your view of abortion and the law?
Abortion should be legal, without any specific restrictions. 19 20.43%
Abortion should be legal, but subject to some restriction(s). 50 53.76%
Abortion should be banned, but subject to exceptions. 10 10.75%
Abortion should be banned, with the sole exception of when the life of the mother is in jeopardy. 14 15.05%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #526 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
That makes as much sense as a "legal argument" that people can be tried twice for the same crime. However you, me, or anyone else feels about it, abortions are not, ipso facto, murder until or unless the law is changed to make them such.
What????

So law decides when a human becomes human? If it was 25 would that make it ok to kill people under 25?

Law makers cant decide this because congress doesnt know shit.

When was congress God?

Also I dont understand your double jeopardy example...

I dont understand how a fetus can be just that one day (nothing more then junk) but the next day its a valued baby.

What type of shit is that?

It should always be valued and if you dont reconize it at 5 weeks then you dont at 25 because its all the same to me. 5 weeks or 25 years old they are at both stages valued humans.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #527 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 1,994

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
What????

So law decides when a human becomes human? If it was 25 would that make it ok to kill people under 25?

Law makers cant decide this because congress doesnt know shit.

When was congress God?

Also I dont understand your double jeopardy example...

I dont understand how a fetus can be just that one day (nothing more then junk) but the next day its a valued baby.

What type of shit is that?

It should always be valued and if you dont reconize it at 5 weeks then you dont at 25 because its all the same to me. 5 weeks or 25 years old they are at both stages valued humans.
I agree with you. No law can actually define what a human is because a human is too complex to be actually defined. You could easily say a human is defined as a species of mammals, but how much does that actually say about the human species? I judge based on my own beliefs I assume to be true.
__________________
Remember the Turkey Genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #528 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
What????

So law decides when a human becomes human? If it was 25 would that make it ok to kill people under 25?

Law makers cant decide this because congress doesnt know shit.

When was congress God?

Also I dont understand your double jeopardy example...

I dont understand how a fetus can be just that one day (nothing more then junk) but the next day its a valued baby.

What type of shit is that?

It should always be valued and if you dont reconize it at 5 weeks then you dont at 25 because its all the same to me. 5 weeks or 25 years old they are at both stages valued humans.
None of this is relevant. "Murder" is a legal term that describes the unlawful killing of a person. Abortion is not unlawful and therefore, it is not "murder", regardless of whether a fetus is a "person" or not. The double jeopardy comment was to illustrate that you can't substitute your disagreement with the law for the law itself.

You think abortion should be murder. But, to say that it is murder is simply saying something that is demonstrably incorrect. If abortions were murders, then aborting mothers and/or their doctors would be tried for murder.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #529 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
I agree with you. No law can actually define what a human is because a human is too complex to be actually defined. You could easily say a human is defined as a species of mammals, but how much does that actually say about the human species? I judge based on my own beliefs I assume to be true.
I'm a Christian so I believe that people have no right to define when a fetus is a valued "object"..... No one has the right so its better to be safe then sorry.

Now of course if a woman has an ectopic pregnancy then thats a different story but to abort for no reason other then not wanting to deal with the responsibility or other superficial reasons is wrong.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #530 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
None of this is relevant. "Murder" is a legal term that describes the unlawful killing of a person. Abortion is not unlawful and therefore, it is not "murder", regardless of whether a fetus is a "person" or not. The double jeopardy comment was to illustrate that you can't substitute your disagreement with the law for the law itself.

You think abortion should be murder. But, to say that it is murder is simply saying something that is demonstrably incorrect. If abortions were murders, then aborting mothers and/or their doctors would be tried for murder.
What? Murder is a legal term? Are you not Human your self?

I would expect that answer out of a sociopath.

People dont kill people and it has nothing to do with law and everything to do with empathy for others.

I dont kill people because I fear the law.... I dont kill people because I dont want to hurt others and I know there families love them and even if they dont have families I have no right to take a life because its WRONG!!!!! I am NOT God. The Law is nothing more then punishment for psychos that dont have morals or empathy for others.

Yea thats why we dont eat people too.

I think your a sociopath.
Reply With Quote
  #531 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 1,994

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
I'm a Christian so I believe that people have no right to define when a fetus is a valued "object"..... No one has the right so its better to be safe then sorry.

Now of course if a woman has an ectopic pregnancy then thats a different story but to abort for no reason other then not wanting to deal with the responsibility or other superficial reasons is wrong.
Unfortunately there is no room for religion in court and so you will never convince any judge based on what your religion tells you to believe. That is why abortion is legal and will remain legal.
__________________
Remember the Turkey Genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #532 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
What? Murder is a legal term? Are you not Human your self?

I would expect that answer out of a sociopath.

People dont kill people and it has nothing to do with law and everything to do with empathy for others.

I dont kill people because I fear the law.... I dont kill people because I dont want to hurt others and I know there families love them and even if they dont have families I have no right to take a life because its WRONG!!!!! I am NOT God. The Law is nothing more then punishment for psychos that dont have morals or empathy for others.

Yea thats why we dont eat people too.

I think your a sociopath.
While your sentimentality is touching, and I have no doubt that your gentle heart is absolutely bursting with empathy and tears of understanding for everyone you see, namecalling and emotional hysterics are lost on me.

If you want to make an argument, make one. If you're going to call me names because you don't bother to understand the definitions of words that you use and try to cover that fact with the hippie crap you just spewed, color me uninterested. And, by the way, I'll file this "give peace a chance, can't we all be brothers" schmaltz away for the next time you're feeling in the mood to stump for one of our current pet wars or else a new one that you want to slake your bloodlust. After all, you described yourself as a "neocon" and neocons tend to like war for its own sake.

Now, do you have anything of substance to add, or should I take your previous rant as concession that you either ignored or were unaware that "murder" is a legal term with a specific meaning?
Reply With Quote
  #533 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Pogo's Avatar
Pogo Pogo is offline
Feel the compassion?
Want some gov't pie?

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Earth
Posts: 6,491

Earth     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Most research says that none of us become self aware until between 12 and 18 months. Are you saying that children between birth and whenever they become self aware are also not persons? Your argument, like so many attempts to philosophize away the humanity of a human bieng falls apart under even the most meager scrutiny.
Are you denying that self-consciousness is one of, if not the, most significant defining characteristics of humans?



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Sorry, but I am not wrong. If a judge, any judge, suggested that Black's was deficient, can you imagine the number of appeals that would spring up if Black's were used in any manner in the case? Even the Supreme Court wouldn't suggest such a thing.
That has nothing to do with right or wrong. You're simply saying that the judiciary would find it inexpedient and would therefore refuse to do it, which is a scathing indictment, if true, in that it shows that expedience takes precedence over ethics.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Sorry, but one doesn't have to be self conscious to be a human being. Again, children born without brains are considered human beings by the law. Again, your argument fails under even slight scrutiny.
Really? Is it legal to allow them to die, or does the law stipulate that they must be kept alive?



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Now you are bringing aliens into the discussion? Are you kidding? Let me know when they get here.
If/when they do, Black's definition of "person" goes right out the window.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Because the offspring of two human beings can be nothing else. Each individual of the species homo sapiens sapiens is a human being without regard to how old or mature they are. If you dispute this, I wholeheartedly encourage you to bring some credible science to support your claim. If you can't, then I am afraid that your flat earth, dogmatic arguments simply don't hold up.
Is this the precise reasoning given by the medical literature that you frequently cite or is this your own reasoning?

Why is it scientifically necessary to say that a zygote is a human being, rather than merely saying that it is human?



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
All human beings are persons. Personhood is a matter of kind, and not degree. If personhood were a matter of degree, then you could do things that would make you more of a person or less of a person and younger people would be less persons than older persons and older persons would be more persons than younger. Such is not the case. You can do any manner of things to be a better or worse person, but nothing to be more or less of a person.
That is merely an assumption.

Furthermore, I would say that both "humanness" and "personhood" can be measured in degree. As self-consciousness is an important defining characteristic of humanness, I would say, then, that a person with self-consciousness has to be considered more human than one which lacks it, assuming that we wish to be honest.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Actually, I have acknowledged no such thing. Any legal case involves technicalities to a degree, but no valid case rests on a technicality. That is precicely why roe is on such shaky ground. It rests entirely on a technicality. It is based on the assumption that unborns are not human beings.
Actually, you have, in that your position rests entirely on the premise that because Black's defines "person" as a human being, a human being is therefore necessarily a person.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
Actually, it isn't You can make the claim, but you are completely unable to prove it.
All you managed to show above was that from the standpoint of expedience it was unlikely that the judiciary would acknowledge such a deficiency, which, again, is a scathing indictment if true.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
As to the science, I encourage you to bring some science here from a pro choice sientist who says that unborns are at some point something other than human beings. We both know that you can't, because even pro choice scientists admit freely that we are human beings at any stage of development. If a bias existed, then there would be credible science stating that we are something other than human beings before we are born.
Again, why is it scientifically necessary to say that a zygote is a human being rather than merely saying that it is human?

Can it be scientifically demonstrated to be an absolutely necessary distinction?

How does a scientific dictionary define "human being"?

Is such a definition the most applicable in a court of law and if so, why?



Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
There is no need to "have" to go back to the founders. My position is supported by modern science, the constitution, and existing legal precedent. Yours needs a rewrite of the legal dictionary that has been in use by practically every court in the country since the 1890's and, apparently, contact with aliens.
Then why did you refer back to the founders and their "inalienable rights" when I asked you where in the US Constitution is it stated that Zygotes are persons?
__________________
Who does vote for these dishonest shitheads? Who among us can be happy and proud of having all this innocent blood on our hands? Who are these swine? These flag-sucking half-wits who get fleeced and fooled by stupid little rich kids like George Bush?

--Hunter S. Thompson
Reply With Quote
  #534 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
PaleRider's Avatar
PaleRider PaleRider is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,440

United_States     North_Carolina

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
I find it odd that in order to make an argument, you must begin by trying to single out your definition as the only valid definition. What does that say about your argument?
By all means, provide the source for your "definition".
__________________
Rem tene, verba sequentur.
Reply With Quote
  #535 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
Unfortunately there is no room for religion in court and so you will never convince any judge based on what your religion tells you to believe. That is why abortion is legal and will remain legal.
Then why swear on the Bible?

If there is no room for religion then why not lie on the stand? why not expect it?

Maybe morally is wrong? ethically its you...

Doesnt matter anyways because people go to jail every day for lieng on the stand. Religion is morality in society... You cant expect people to be ethical, liberals arent and you can CLEARLY see that at the RNC with little hoods breaking innocent peoples store front windows... It proves librealism and the lack of religion in ones life makes them unethical.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #536 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
While your sentimentality is touching, and I have no doubt that your gentle heart is absolutely bursting with empathy and tears of understanding for everyone you see, namecalling and emotional hysterics are lost on me.

If you want to make an argument, make one. If you're going to call me names because you don't bother to understand the definitions of words that you use and try to cover that fact with the hippie crap you just spewed, color me uninterested. And, by the way, I'll file this "give peace a chance, can't we all be brothers" schmaltz away for the next time you're feeling in the mood to stump for one of our current pet wars or else a new one that you want to slake your bloodlust. After all, you described yourself as a "neocon" and neocons tend to like war for its own sake.

Now, do you have anything of substance to add, or should I take your previous rant as concession that you either ignored or were unaware that "murder" is a legal term with a specific meaning?
lol...

Look fuck name calling...I dont really give a shit about your feelings because its you who controll them.

You liberals are all the same ALL OF YOU....Fuck your feelings... only a punks feelings gets hurt.

Also I didnt call anyone anything directly .... I dont like liberals.

I have been adding substance guy.... You just dont realize it because you have a disease called liberalsim which makes you overlook or ignore things. You dont want to believe there are libreals right now destroying the RNC so you block it out of your head and say I dont have substance.

You want dumb fucks like Obama to tell you what you want to hear and then you turn the "ears" on...

I expect nothing more out of liberals then what I have seen over the last few days and not only that but EXPECTED it.... They think they are the Weathermen or the SDS..... They should get a fucking job.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #537 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 1,994

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
Then why swear on the Bible?

If there is no room for religion then why not lie on the stand? why not expect it?

Maybe morally is wrong? ethically its you...

Doesnt matter anyways because people go to jail every day for lieng on the stand. Religion is morality in society... You cant expect people to be ethical, liberals arent and you can CLEARLY see that at the RNC with little hoods breaking innocent peoples store front windows... It proves librealism and the lack of religion in ones life makes them unethical.
It depends what you consider is unethical.
__________________
Remember the Turkey Genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #538 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

A buch of rich privliged white fucking kids that think they are liberals but riot because they are too stupid to understand the Constitution and have proven every point I have made in my political blogging.... They are the reason why I started blogging ... The leftists animals are the reason why I took an interest in politics. I was once a liberal and saw this junk several years ago and turned my back on this pathetic idology called liberalism much like david horowitz did to the SDS and the weather underground.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #539<