Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

View Poll Results: Which position best describes your view of abortion and the law?
Abortion should be legal, without any specific restrictions. 19 20.43%
Abortion should be legal, but subject to some restriction(s). 50 53.76%
Abortion should be banned, but subject to exceptions. 10 10.75%
Abortion should be banned, with the sole exception of when the life of the mother is in jeopardy. 14 15.05%
Voters: 93. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #541 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
It depends what you consider is unethical.
Yea, a persons "violation" of hurting dont fall under unethical treatment or morality for that matter.

People shouldnt have to depend on other people to be happy... typical liberal ideology states that I should have to make you happy... I should hold your feelings as your psyical nerves...

It's called "entitlement"...

Now, with that said.... Unethical is breaking the Ten Commandments which Im quite sure you never read but know.... The Ten Commandments are ethical and moral law.... Beyond that you are entitled to nothing.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #542 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
PaleRider's Avatar
PaleRider PaleRider is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,440

United_States     North_Carolina

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Are you denying that self-consciousness is one of, if not the, most significant defining characteristics of humans?
Yes I am because every child under 12 months is recognized as a human being although they are not self aware. Even children born so retarded that they will never become self aware are considered to be human beings. Arguing that one must be self aware in order to be a human being when there are literaly millions upon millions who are not self aware but are considered to be human beings strikes me as... well, never mind what it strikes me as. Suffice it to say that it is a very weak argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
That has nothing to do with right or wrong. You're simply saying that the judiciary would find it inexpedient and would therefore refuse to do it, which is a scathing indictment, if true, in that it shows that expedience takes precedence over ethics.
THe fact is that the definition is what it is and has been since Black's was first published. The pro choice side of this issue has been trying since roe to redefine what a human being is and have, as of today, not yet succeeded.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Really? Is it legal to allow them to die, or does the law stipulate that they must be kept alive?
As I have pointed out numerous times now, the courts have said that there is an indisputable difference betweeen killing a healthy individual and letting one die who is so sick or injured that no hope of recovery exists.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
If/when they do, Black's definition of "person" goes right out the window.
Do you believe that we would have to, for some reason, call aliens human beings? Do you believe that they would even want to be called persons?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Is this the precise reasoning given by the medical literature that you frequently cite or is this your own reasoning?
I invite you to refer to a medical dictionary, or a scientific dictionary, or any old dictionary and look up human being. If my argument required that I must redefine members of a species in order to even get it off the ground, I would start working on a new argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Why is it scientifically necessary to say that a zygote is a human being, rather than merely saying that it is human?
Because your skin is human skin. Your kidneys are human kidneys. In fact, any human tissue could be classified as human whereas a zygote is an individual member of the species. It is not simply human tissue, it is a separate individual. This is elementary developmental biology. Are you seriously telling me that you are not aware of these facts?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Furthermore, I would say that both "humanness" and "personhood" can be measured in degree. As self-consciousness is an important defining characteristic of humanness, I would say, then, that a person with self-consciousness has to be considered more human than one which lacks it, assuming that we wish to be honest.
You can say anything you like. All that matters, however, is what you can substantiate.

And one who is self conscious has merely manifested more of his or her potential than one who has not. They are not different creatures because one has realized his or her potential to a greater degree. On a philosophical level, your argument falls apart as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Actually, you have, in that your position rests entirely on the premise that because Black's defines "person" as a human being, a human being is therefore necessarily a person.
And exactly what does your positon rest on? A meeting with aliens? Rewriting a legal dicitonary that has been in use, and accepted for over 100 years?

My position has been substantiated while yours has not and never will be.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
All you managed to show above was that from the standpoint of expedience it was unlikely that the judiciary would acknowledge such a deficiency, which, again, is a scathing indictment if true.
A scathing indictment because it doesn't agree with you? You believe the definition is deficient because you don't agree with it? Why not simply wake up and realize that your position is indefensible and you really would have to redefine the whole species in order to make a rational argument.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Again, why is it scientifically necessary to say that a zygote is a human being rather than merely saying that it is human?
I have already explained it. A zygote is an individual member of the species and not just so much human tissue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Can it be scientifically demonstrated to be an absolutely necessary distinction?
Yes. Why do you believe the medical texts identify them as human beings rather than human?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
How does a scientific dictionary define "human being"?
any individual of the genus Homo, esp. a member of the species Homo sapiens

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Is such a definition the most applicable in a court of law and if so, why?
Since it is the definition, why would you want to use another definition in a court of law? It makes no sense. Suppose in your buisness transactions you bought a horse and had reason to sue and you get to court and find out that the court doesn't consider your horse to be a horse?

Human beings are what they are. Human being is a scientific term that wouldn't be found in a legal dictionary. Person is a legal term, used in legal writings and pleadings to describe a human being.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pogo View Post
Then why did you refer back to the founders and their "inalienable rights" when I asked you where in the US Constitution is it stated that Zygotes are persons?
I asked you where it stated that they weren't? Zygotes are, however human beings. I have substantiated that argument and you have yet to provide any credible material to rebutt it and in the eyes of the law, human being and person are interchangable terms which I have also substantiated. So far, I have not made a point that I am unable to substantiate while you have not made a point that you can substantiate. This isn't going well for you.
__________________
Rem tene, verba sequentur.
Reply With Quote
  #543 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 1,994

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleRider View Post
By all means, provide the source for your "definition".
As I said read the wikipedia article: Human - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Quote:
Humans are notable for their desire to understand and influence the world around them, seeking to explain and manipulate natural phenomena through science, philosophy, mythology and religion. This natural curiosity has led to the development of advanced tools and skills; humans are the only species known to build fires, cook their food, clothe themselves, and manipulate and develop numerous other technologies. Humans pass down their skills and knowledge to the next generations through education.
I could for example use this as part of my definition of what a human actually is. Anything here is something present in humans and it clearly separates humans from other things. A "human" without a brain clear doesn't fit anything here just like a blade of grass doesn't fit anything here.
__________________
Remember the Turkey Genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #544 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
AJG's Avatar
AJG AJG is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Home of the Gay
Posts: 1,994

Massachusetts     United_States

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
Yea, a persons "violation" of hurting dont fall under unethical treatment or morality for that matter.

People shouldnt have to depend on other people to be happy... typical liberal ideology states that I should have to make you happy... I should hold your feelings as your psyical nerves...

It's called "entitlement"...

Now, with that said.... Unethical is breaking the Ten Commandments which Im quite sure you never read but know.... The Ten Commandments are ethical and moral law.... Beyond that you are entitled to nothing.
Where does liberalism say people should have to depend on other people to be happy? And what would society be if we didn't depend on other people to make us happy? Nothing like it is today.
__________________
Remember the Turkey Genocide.
Reply With Quote
  #545 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
lol...

Look fuck name calling...I dont really give a shit about your feelings because its you who controll them.
My feelings aren't relevant - it was you who offered up the mushy display of sentimentality that would make Hallmark proud. If your opinion is "fuck namecalling" and "I don't give a shit about feelings", why am I being treated to emotion laden rants about "empathy" and namecalling? Save it for your afternoon viewing of Dr. Phil and try practicing what you preach. If I wanted this kind of 'discussion' I'd forget a girlfriend's birthday or something.

Quote:
You liberals are all the same ALL OF YOU....Fuck your feelings... only a punks feelings gets hurt.

Also I didnt call anyone anything directly .... I dont like liberals.
I believe you called me a 'sociopath' but that doesn't hurt my feelings. I just don't find it interesting. You had nothing worthwhile to say, so instead, you called me a name and treated the board to some whining about empathy or whatever you were on about during that Oxygen channel moment you had earlier.

Quote:
I have been adding substance guy.... You just dont realize it because you have a disease called liberalsim which makes you overlook or ignore things. You dont want to believe there are libreals right now destroying the RNC so you block it out of your head and say I dont have substance.
Forgive me if I don't take your assessment of who is and who is not a liberal very seriously after you treated me earlier to several posts where you expressed a desire for America to be a socialist nation.

Quote:
You want dumb fucks like Obama to tell you what you want to hear and then you turn the "ears" on...

I expect nothing more out of liberals then what I have seen over the last few days and not only that but EXPECTED it.... They think they are the Weathermen or the SDS..... They should get a fucking job.
This is just nonsense. Take a few deep breaths and gather your thoughts. Do you have any thoughts on what we were originally discussing, which was whether or not abortion is "murder" as a "legal argument"?
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #546 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
My feelings aren't relevant - it was you who offered up the mushy display of sentimentality that would make Hallmark proud. If your opinion is "fuck namecalling" and "I don't give a shit about feelings", why am I being treated to emotion laden rants about "empathy" and namecalling? Save it for your afternoon viewing of Dr. Phil and try practicing what you preach. If I wanted this kind of 'discussion' I'd forget a girlfriend's birthday or something.
My point is being ethical has nothing to do with politics or religion. I dont have to be taught to not kill people.


Quote:
I believe you called me a 'sociopath' but that doesn't hurt my feelings. I just don't find it interesting. You had nothing worthwhile to say, so instead, you called me a name and treated the board to some whining about empathy or whatever you were on about during that Oxygen channel moment you had earlier
.

Bullshit I would have called you a sociopath directly if I thought you were. Dont try to turn this around on me and make me the villian... when I talk about feelings this is what I'm talking about. not only this but thinking your the victim all the time when your hardly.



Quote:
Forgive me if I don't take your assessment of who is and who is not a liberal very seriously after you treated me earlier to several posts where you expressed a desire for America to be a socialist nation.
Right lol.... I'm a socialist but a capitalist.


Quote:
This is just nonsense. Take a few deep breaths and gather your thoughts. Do you have any thoughts on what we were originally discussing, which was whether or not abortion is "murder" as a "legal argument"?
You need to learn the Ten Commandments and then you will understand but I'm quite sure you would melt at the sight of a Bible.
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #547 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by AJG View Post
Where does liberalism say people should have to depend on other people to be happy? And what would society be if we didn't depend on other people to make us happy? Nothing like it is today.
You own a written rule book of progressive libralism?

People make people happy because it makes people happy.


Am I an asshole you think?
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote
  #548 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
My point is being ethical has nothing to do with politics or religion. I dont have to be taught to not kill people.
Sure you do. If you'd been born in a different time and place, you would have been taught that killing people was acceptable. Throughout a lot of recorded human history, killing your wife was not too big of a deal in manysocieties.

Quote:
Bullshit I would have called you a sociopath directly if I thought you were. Dont try to turn this around on me and make me the villian... when I talk about feelings this is what I'm talking about. not only this but thinking your the victim all the time when your hardly.
You mean, like this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
I think your a sociopath.
And, I don't think that you're a villain. People usually resort to name calling (and comical denials of their own actions) when they have nothing worthwhile to say. So, I don't think you're a villain. To be honest, watching you attempt to debate inspires pity more than anything else.

Quote:
Right lol.... I'm a socialist but a capitalist.
I don't think you really know exactly what system your beliefs fall into. But, believing that jobs "belong" to people and believing that the role of the government is to make sure unskilled laborers have a wage that they like is certainly nothing resembling capitalism. Going by your statements in that thread, I would say that you're a socialist instead of a capitalist, rather than suffering from the cognitive dissonance of trying to be both.

Quote:
You need to learn the Ten Commandments and then you will understand but I'm quite sure you would melt at the sight of a Bible.
Melt? I've actually read the Bible, which I'm willing to wager puts me one up on you. It's an interesting book filled with some useful lessons, some tales of a rather sadistic deity (Old Testament), some nonsense (Revelations), and some dry parts. I'd imagine you could learn a lot from reading it, were you to bother.

But, while we're on the subject, why don't you thumb to the page in your Bible that says anything about abortion. And, before you try to guess which commandment says something about killing, have a read of this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Genesis 2:7
And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
If I didn't know better, I'd think the Bible was telling me that men only possess a soul upon breathing. Perhaps the Bible needs to read the Bible to learn about your take on abortion! Perhaps you could point both the Bible and myself to the section about abortion.

...but I won't be holding my breath
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #549 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

For anyone else curious about where the Bible addresses abortion, this is a particularly interesting passage:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Exodus 21:22-25
If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
To be clear here, the Bible says that a man who assaults a pregnant woman need only pay the husband a fine. That is, if you're in the mood for someone to abort, punch a pregnant woman, pay her husband a fine for the loss of property, and go on your merry way. If a woman or the husband want to abort, this is clearly perfectly acceptable as paying a fine to yourself is a wash.

Stupid liberal Bible, not valuing the sanctity of unborn life! Why even American abortion law is hasher than the Bible. At least women here are required to go to the doctor and men beating up pregnant women could be charged with murder instead of ordered to pay a fine! The Bible is going to hell if it keeps up like this!
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #550 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
drgoodtrips's Avatar
drgoodtrips drgoodtrips is offline
Moderator
Feel the power of the dark side.

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 18,853

   
Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

At this point, I have to give a nod to Pale Rider who, though I disagree with many of his arguments, I seem to recall never makes silly arguments about abortion based on the Bible.
__________________
"Government big enough to supply everything you need is big enough to take everything you have... The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases."

-Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #551 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2008
Swoop187's Avatar
Swoop187 Swoop187 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,377

United_States     Italy

Re: One last abortion poll (Now with more options!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drgoodtrips View Post
Sure you do. If you'd been born in a different time and place, you would have been taught that killing people was acceptable. Throughout a lot of recorded human history, killing your wife was not too big of a deal in manysocieties.
I agree..... It still goes on today along with fathers trading there daughters for sheep to eat.

Still doesnt mean jack tho buddy.... This is the US not Africa or South America.


Quote:
You mean, like this:
cant see my comment or your response to is so...




Quote:
And, I don't think that you're a villain. People usually resort to name calling (and comical denials of their own actions) when they have nothing worthwhile to say. So, I don't think you're a villain. To be honest, watching you attempt to debate inspires pity more than anything else.
I see the world for what it is and you "pitty" me, thats pretty astounding. Why you pitty me for? dont know me do ya?





Quote:
I don't think you really know exactly what system your beliefs fall into. But, believing that jobs "belong" to people and believing that the role of the government is to make sure unskilled laborers have a wage that they like is certainly nothing resembling capitalism. Going by your statements in that thread, I would say that you're a socialist instead of a capitalist, rather than suffering from the cognitive dissonance of trying to be both.
You sir have folded into a political system.. The only questions you ask are the ones your told to ask..

You think choosing who to help because of skin color or whatever will make you a better person?

Why dont you try helping people who need help?

I'm not well to do and most likely have less money then you so give me some money fucker....why not?

I'm 28 years old and I passed the college entry test or whatever the shit is and was accpted at community college but the catch is Im not black so I dont get student aid ...

However Fox news isnt fair and balanced.......

Why?

libralism caused it so keep it shut homie...



Melt? I've actually read the Bible, which I'm willing to wager puts me one up on you. It's an interesting book filled with some useful lessons, some tales of a rather sadistic deity (Old Testament), some nonsense (Revelations), and some dry parts. I'd imagine you could learn a lot from reading it, were you to bother.

But, while we're on the subject, why don't you thumb to the page in your Bible that says anything about abortion. And, before you try to guess which commandment says something about killing, have a read of this:



If I didn't know better, I'd think the Bible was telling me that men only possess a soul upon breathing. Perhaps the Bible needs to read the Bible to learn about your take on abortion! Perhaps you could point both the Bible and myself to the section about abortion.

...but I won't be holding my breath [/quote]
__________________
America’s political correctness is a disease that will bring down our once fine nation.
Reply With Quote