Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues

Abortion, Civil Rights, Healthcare and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, Healthcare and other such issues

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2008
Tanngrisnir3's Avatar
Tanngrisnir3 Tanngrisnir3 is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,604

California     United_States

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Impugn View Post
How on Earth can you see any sort of advantage to sports being dominated by physically and psychologically damaged steroid junkies?
I don't. Why would you assume I did? I've known enough athletes to know that those that are truly naturally gifted at the professional level, i.e., those who don't indulge, are the ones that those who do indulge think they need to catch up with, both mentally AND physically.
Quote:

How is it "WAAAAAA!!!" to assert that it is ridiculous to place at a disadvantage athletes who would choose to not become steroid junkies? How ignorant of reality does somebody have to be to know the progression would be from a few people abusing steroids to get an edge to a culture requiring steroid abuse just to achieve mediocrity?
The steroid users that I've met (and heard about, but that's hearsay) have one advantage only: raw strength. Outside of weightlifting, that doesn't offer much, esp. due to the decrease in mental acuity.
Quote:

I'd almost be willing to buy the concept of separate "anything goes" leagues. Let 'em do crystal meth on the sidelines...do lines off a cheerleader's ass...shrink their nuts to raisins and take obscene amounts of steroids. That, unto itself, is fine with me.
Good idea. I like it.
Quote:

However, the probability of adversely affecting lower tier sports and damaging our youth negates whatever benefit you might imagine from such a league.
Ah, the old 'what will it do to the children?' gambit. Doesn't wash with me. That's where parents come in.
Quote:

On top of everything else, as is usual, any from the left in favor of this legalization are also in favor of not forcing the abusers to actually suffer the consequences.
The left? Who are you talking about? As to the consequences, if they take them, fine. If they die from them, fine.
Quote:

If the Leftists' Dream Health Care System emerges...why the fuck should I have to pay for those morons' bad choices? Why should any money/resources go to these people and/or their families when they willingly hurt themselves?
Excuse me, but WTF are you going on about? You shouldn't have to pay for any of that. Who brought this up other than you?
Quote:

Why were we expected to give a flying fuck about Lyle Alzedo - how did this dude become some sort of martyr? Oh, because he was trapped in a culture of steroid use - abuse it or, your job, lose it. Yeah, that's a plan.
Fuck Lyle Alzado. You really need to stop reading things into what you read that aren't really there.

I don't understand where your histrionic rant comes from, but it's not from me.

Good luck.
__________________
All things serve The Beam
Reply With Quote
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeMarine View Post
And neither do steroids. This is an example of the alarmisim I'm talking about. There have been MILLIONS od people use steroids. It's estimated that few million a year in America use them. How many deaths are due to steroids?

Lyle Alzado did NOT die from steroids. Look into the real reason he died. It may surprise you, and lot's of other people.
If you'll read the full exchange between myself and Slon, you'll see that I wasn't singling out steroids. As for whether they're beneficial or not, yes, they are when used properly and for the purpose intended. Do they have adverse reactions? Yes. Does everyone suffer from the adverse reactions? No. I can no longer take cortisone (Medrol dose pack) because within one hour of taking the first dose, my legs swell and my back hurts. Yet, I had taken them at least twice a year for about six years for a variety of ailments. They built up in my body to the point that I started having the adverse reactions and was told to not take them anymore.
Cortisone is a synthetic adrenal steroid that benefits millions of people but can have many side effects. My late step-mother became a bitch when she took them. My late husband was testy when he took them. My mother had no ill effects from them. There's a reason why prescription drugs are given to people under the care of a physician and not a personal trainer! My argument with Slon was that we can't possibly make these drugs OTC and expect a layman to know how to take it properly. A person can't just walk into a lab and order blood work and there are many drugs out there that must be monitored. Slon's argument is that it should be up to the individual as to what he takes. I think it's a ridiculous idea, especially when you consider the fact that many side effects are hidden until it's too late. Something as simple as the antibiotic Keflex almost killed my mother by thinning her blood. She couldn't have gone to a lab and ordered a PT and PTT on her own...a doctor had to order it. I guess Slon thinks that THAT should be left up to the individual also!
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
If you'll read the full exchange between myself and Slon, you'll see that I wasn't singling out steroids. As for whether they're beneficial or not, yes, they are when used properly and for the purpose intended. Do they have adverse reactions? Yes. Does everyone suffer from the adverse reactions? No. I can no longer take cortisone (Medrol dose pack) because within one hour of taking the first dose, my legs swell and my back hurts. Yet, I had taken them at least twice a year for about six years for a variety of ailments. They built up in my body to the point that I started having the adverse reactions and was told to not take them anymore.
Cortisone is a synthetic adrenal steroid that benefits millions of people but can have many side effects. My late step-mother became a bitch when she took them. My late husband was testy when he took them. My mother had no ill effects from them. There's a reason why prescription drugs are given to people under the care of a physician and not a personal trainer! My argument with Slon was that we can't possibly make these drugs OTC and expect a layman to know how to take it properly.
We don't have to. Fact is, you don't know whether anything purchased OTC right now will be used as intended, either. You don't know that a guy purchasing gasoline won't siphon it out later and use it to make an explosive devise to blow up the local courthouse. You also don't know that someone purchasing a knife won't use it to kill a few people and then kill himself. Should we schedule psychological evaluation for anyone interested in buying these items? Hell no.
Quote:
A person can't just walk into a lab and order blood work and there are many drugs out there that must be monitored. Slon's argument is that it should be up to the individual as to what he takes. I think it's a ridiculous idea, especially when you consider the fact that many side effects are hidden until it's too late.
Emphasis mine. What you're basically saying is that it should be the government's job to play mommy and tell us what to take or what not to take. Forced government diets for everyone!
Quote:
Something as simple as the antibiotic Keflex almost killed my mother by thinning her blood. She couldn't have gone to a lab and ordered a PT and PTT on her own...a doctor had to order it. I guess Slon thinks that THAT should be left up to the individual also!
Do you or do you not support an individual's right to suicide?
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 08-11-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
We don't have to. Fact is, you don't know whether anything purchased OTC right now will be used as intended, either. You don't know that a guy purchasing gasoline won't siphon it out later and use it to make an explosive devise to blow up the local courthouse. You also don't know that someone purchasing a knife won't use it to kill a few people and then kill himself. Should we schedule psychological evaluation for anyone interested in buying these items? Hell no.Emphasis mine. What you're basically saying is that it should be the government's job to play mommy and tell us what to take or what not to take. Forced government diets for everyone!
Do you or do you not support an individual's right to suicide?
Slon, your argument is totally stupid. By making all medications OTC, first of all, you're taking the doctor out of the equation which means a lot of people will die trying to get well. You've got a constant headache? Go buy some Vicodin OTC. Take it every 6 hours and you no longer feel the pain but guess what! You've only treated the symptom of hypertension or worse yet, a brain tumor!
You claim that I'm wanting the government to play mommy. No, but I do believe in some guidelines that protect us and the role of the FDA is very important in that area. Not only do they protect us from ourselves but also from unscrupulous snake oil salesmen. The reason I say they protect us from ourselves is because most people don't have the knowledge it takes to correctly diagnose and treat themselves and though they may not wish to die anytime soon, taking the wrong medication for the wrong diagnosis could kill them.
You've stated that you don't agree with lawsuits but the fact is, making all drugs OTC would make the pharmaceutical companies vulnerable to them. Though I feel that most drugs are overpriced, I'm also intelligent enough to realize that if there's no profit, there's no research. No research means that we're never going to find cures for the many deadly diseases that plague us. Complain all you want, accuse me of wanting to be a nanny, but you should look at the complete picture instead of coming up with your really stupid arguments that no intelligent person would ever agree with.
You keep asking whether I support an individual's right to suicide. What the hell does that have to do with my argument? I'm not assuming that everyone that would try to treat themselves if medications were OTC would be wanting to commit suicide. But to satisfy your curiosity, I've never really given it any thought. Off the top of my head though, I have to wonder why an individual would need that "right". I mean, if you want to kill yourself, there's plenty of ways to do it without suddenly having access to Rx drugs OTC.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Slon, your argument is totally stupid. By making all medications OTC, first of all, you're taking the doctor out of the equation which means a lot of people will die trying to get well. You've got a constant headache? Go buy some Vicodin OTC. Take it every 6 hours and you no longer feel the pain but guess what! You've only treated the symptom of hypertension or worse yet, a brain tumor!
It's a person's own business whether or not they want a temporary solution to a potentially long-term problem. I'm not sure why you feel everyone should be the government's private property.
Quote:
You claim that I'm wanting the government to play mommy. No, but I do believe in some guidelines that protect us and the role of the FDA is very important in that area.
Protecting us from ourselves because the government thinks it knows what is best for us IS playing mommy.
Quote:
Not only do they protect us from ourselves but also from unscrupulous snake oil salesmen. The reason I say they protect us from ourselves is because most people don't have the knowledge it takes to correctly diagnose and treat themselves and though they may not wish to die anytime soon, taking the wrong medication for the wrong diagnosis could kill them.
That's their business. Once again, people can buy plenty of substances that are lethal when consumed/injected. I'm not sure why you're limiting this to medication, since many of the substances I mentioned don't even have the possibility of curing anything.
Quote:
You've stated that you don't agree with lawsuits but the fact is, making all drugs OTC would make the pharmaceutical companies vulnerable to them. Though I feel that most drugs are overpriced, I'm also intelligent enough to realize that if there's no profit, there's no research. No research means that we're never going to find cures for the many deadly diseases that plague us.
You're taking one piece of authoritarian legislation and using it to justify more government. Government is the problem in this case, and treating it with even more government is like treating a heroin addiction with more heroin.
Quote:
Complain all you want, accuse me of wanting to be a nanny, but you should look at the complete picture instead of coming up with your really stupid arguments that no intelligent person would ever agree with.
You keep asking whether I support an individual's right to suicide. What the hell does that have to do with my argument? I'm not assuming that everyone that would try to treat themselves if medications were OTC would be wanting to commit suicide. But to satisfy your curiosity, I've never really given it any thought. Off the top of my head though, I have to wonder why an individual would need that "right". I mean, if you want to kill yourself, there's plenty of ways to do it without suddenly having access to Rx drugs OTC.
The point is that if you support an individuals right to kill themselves, you must also support their right to do lesser harm up to the level of suicide (pretty much anything else, like harming themselves with improper medication). If a person wants to risk self-medication, why would you care if you already support the right to suicide? Arguably the worst that will happen is they will kill themselves.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
It's a person's own business whether or not they want a temporary solution to a potentially long-term problem. I'm not sure why you feel everyone should be the government's private property.Protecting us from ourselves because the government thinks it knows what is best for us IS playing mommy.That's their business. Once again, people can buy plenty of substances that are lethal when consumed/injected. I'm not sure why you're limiting this to medication, since many of the substances I mentioned don't even have the possibility of curing anything.You're taking one piece of authoritarian legislation and using it to justify more government. Government is the problem in this case, and treating it with even more government is like treating a heroin addiction with more heroin.

The point is that if you support an individuals right to kill themselves, you must also support their right to do lesser harm up to the level of suicide (pretty much anything else, like harming themselves with improper medication). If a person wants to risk self-medication, why would you care if you already support the right to suicide? Arguably the worst that will happen is they will kill themselves.
Never mind, Slon. I'm really not sure why I even bothered to try to talk sense to you. You're as incapable of grasping reality as the three month old that you believe can consent to sex.
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Si modo's Avatar
Si modo Si modo is offline
In a Garden of Eden
Buckeye by birth; Boilermaker by choice

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 14,196
Blog Entries: 1

United_States    
Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Never mind, Slon. I'm really not sure why I even bothered to try to talk sense to you. You're as incapable of grasping reality as the three month old that you believe can consent to sex.
You brought up some great points, and to add to them, without the FDA and Good Manufacturing Practices, we would not be ensured of injesting drugs (and food) where toxic contaminants during manufacture were tightly controlled for non-toxic levels. There are so many reasonable facts for supporting why it is controlled as it is. You also seem to be correct on the futility of bringing these facts out, too.
__________________
I am an American. That's the way most of us put it, just matter of factly. They are plain words, those four: you could write them on your thumbnail, or sweep them clear across this bright autumn sky. But remember too, that they are more than just words. They are a way of life. So whenever you speak them; speak them firmly, speak them proudly, speak them gratefully. I am an American. ...a tradition
Reply With Quote
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
You brought up some great points, and to add to them, without the FDA and Good Manufacturing Practices, we would not be ensured of injesting drugs (and food) where toxic contaminants during manufacture were tightly controlled for non-toxic levels. There are so many reasonable facts for supporting why it is controlled as it is. You also seem to be correct on the futility of bringing these facts out, too.
Thanks...I knew an intelligent person would understand!
__________________


"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways - Chardonnay in one hand - chocolate in the other - body thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and screaming "WOO HOO, What a Ride!"
Reply With Quote
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Si modo View Post
You brought up some great points, and to add to them, without the FDA and Good Manufacturing Practices, we would not be ensured of injesting drugs (and food) where toxic contaminants during manufacture were tightly controlled for non-toxic levels. There are so many reasonable facts for supporting why it is controlled as it is. You also seem to be correct on the futility of bringing these facts out, too.
If there are known toxins in the foods, and the manufacturers don't let it be known (and it is not common knowledge), then selling food without those warnings would, in a way, be false advertising.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 08-12-2008
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. M View Post
Never mind, Slon. I'm really not sure why I even bothered to try to talk sense to you. You're as incapable of grasping reality as the three month old that you believe can consent to sex.
Instead if posting ad-hominem-only posts, perhaps you could actually address the points I made?
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #71 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Drake View Post
OK fine, so they only suppress your immune system, cause manic insanity and make men develop breasts, hell, we should feed 'em to toddlers, never too early to teach our children the need to WIN.

Fer Pete's puking sake, it's JUST A GODDAM GAME. This is what comes of making the movement of an inflated pigskin up and down a gradated field into a national obsession. Now we have people putting their lives at risk TO KNOCK A BALL A FEW YARDS FURTHER, boy, there's a real demand for that skill, sure as hell beats knowing how to run a computer anyday.

Home runs, worth dying for.

And please, please, don't try the old saw about sports teach us "life lessons". I always thought LIFE was supposed to teach us life lessons, but if you go by our present President, (who was baseball commissioner once) he sure as hell didn't learn any.

Actually, there are steroids aimed specifically at women and small children, as well as burn victims. Check out a steroid named Anavar. By the way, steroids are given to people who have very suppresssed immuno systems every day. Check out AIDS patients and a steroid called Deca-Durabolin. They are also eligible for Human Growth Horomone.

Patients with anemias are given doses of testosterone enanthat in excess of 750 mgs a week, since the substance greatly improves the bodies production of blood cells at doses over 500 mg a week.

Odd how these drugs that can Kill at miniscule doses" are given to patients most at risk.

Manic insanity huh? Would you please post proof of your claim? Proof that has only steroids to blame.


As I said, hysteria.
Reply With Quote
  #72 (permalink)  
Old 08-13-2008
SomeMarine SomeMarine is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 892

   
Re: Legalizing steroid use a good idea

Quote:
Originally Posted by Impugn View Post
Like I said, I've seen first hand what parents will do to give their children an edge. It only gets worse as they get older and the stakes increase.

Given that dynamic, call it whatever the fuck you want, but I do not see any advantage to allowing performance enhancing drugs into the equation.

If you could tell me that only this pro league and that pro sport were allowing them, fine. But what you refuse to recognize is that if you set the "top bar" to that represented by artificially enhanced athletes, the various lower tiers leading up to that - yes, right down to the 3rd Graders - will be affected by that culture.

I'm for liberating all sorts of shit because I think that, left to their own devices, the population, as a whole, will make inferior choices to those made by me, my family, and my children. So, any differentiating influence can only serve to make my existence better. Go ahead. Legalize smack. Hopefully the guy down the hall from me in the corner office gives it a try and I benefit.

This particular issue, however, is exactly what I said it is. Call me names all day. I'm comfortable with my position on this.

Off the hook libertarianism is fun to talk about but about as practical and dangerous as an ejector seat in a helicopter.
And any dumbass doing this should be tried, and convicted of child abuse.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online