Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Issue Politics > Abortion, Civil Rights and other Social Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read

Abortion, Civil Rights and other Social Issues Abortion, Civil Rights, Homosexuality, Education, and other issues except health care.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense
Weirdo centrist

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Democratic Republic of Dublin
Posts: 2,034

Ireland     Israel

Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

I'm just wondering, because I've recently heard a lot of people express opposition to gay marriage, but not to civil unions. Also, I found some interesting blog posts on the topic:

http://hillbuzz.org/2009/11/04/wedne...-november-4th/

Thursday Open Thread: November 5, 2009 HillBuzz

Frankly, I'm a little sick of straight people claiming that dropping the word marriage or compromising in any way would be terrible, mainly because they're not the ones who have to live with the consequences. That said, I have no idea if it would work.

What say you?
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 15,984

United_States     Colombia

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Is it easier to get civil unions than marriage? Probably.

Should a large portion of our society have to settle for less state recognition? Fuck no.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense
Weirdo centrist

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Democratic Republic of Dublin
Posts: 2,034

Ireland     Israel

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
Should a large portion of our society have to settle for less state recognition? Fuck no.
Fine, but would civil unions necessarily be inferior? And it also relates to the consequences of holding out for the perfect recognition. I'd rather have less than I want than nothing at all. Civil unions in some states would make it easier to fight DOMA, which would be harder to justify if you have real life, demonstrably committed couples being affected by it.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,833

United_States     Virginia

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Donkey_Left View Post
Is it easier to get civil unions than marriage? Probably.
demonstrably.



Quote:
Should a large portion of our society have to settle for less state recognition? Fuck no.

large ?
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Commodore's Avatar
Secretary of Defense
Nationalist

 
Member Since: Apr 2009
Location: Upstate New York, USA
Posts: 2,305

New_York     Earth

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

There are a number legal rights that are included with state recognition of marriage that can be available to any willing to be contractually bond.

But thats a far cry from a legally recognized core of a family.
__________________
January 21, 2013: The End of an ERROR.

"Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become more corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters."
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
"The Constitution only gives people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself."
---Benjamin Franklin
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,643

   
Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Civil unions and marriage should both be denied to gays. Both involve official state recognition of immoral activies as defined by the majority.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
daddio's Avatar
Vice President

 
Member Since: Jun 2008
Location: the south
Posts: 8,833

United_States     Virginia

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
Fine, but would civil unions necessarily be inferior? And it also relates to the consequences of holding out for the perfect recognition. I'd rather have less than I want than nothing at all. Civil unions in some states would make it easier to fight DOMA, which would be harder to justify if you have real life, demonstrably committed couples being affected by it.

Civil unions are considered unacceptable in California
__________________
Socialism doesn't create a rising tide that lifts all boats. It drains the lake and teaches the boat riders not to help themselves by rowing.

Jesus loves you, allah wants you dead

"Every government interference in the economy consists of giving an unearned benefit, extorted by force, to some men at the expense of others."

Ayn Rand
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
President
Damage Inc.

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: Charon
Posts: 13,615

United_States     Antarctica

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
Fine, but would civil unions necessarily be inferior?
That's like asking if a mother is inferior to a father.

Of course they're not necessarily inferior, just different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
And it also relates to the consequences of holding out for the perfect recognition. I'd rather have less than I want than nothing at all.
That you believe the naming of a different kind of human relationship indicative of its value, is something you might reconsider.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
Civil unions in some states would make it easier to fight DOMA, which would be harder to justify if you have real life, demonstrably committed couples being affected by it.
Why does DOMA have to be "fought" ?

Is it worth it over the word ? I thought this was about rights ?
__________________
Something wicked this way comes.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Donkey_Left's Avatar
President
Sinner

 
Member Since: Jan 2005
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 15,984

United_States     Colombia

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by daddio View Post


large ?
Yes, actually.
__________________
"Jesus said: I have cast fire upon the world, and behold I guard it until it is ablaze."
Gospel of Thomas
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
City Council Member

 
Member Since: Jul 2008
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 152

Maryland     United_States

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

I think they make a huge mistake by ceding "marriage" to opponents. The issue is currently framed as whether they can get married and that bigots won't let them. But really, everyone who wants to should just get married, loudly and publicly. Then the issue simply becomes whether their marriages enjoy the same legal advantages as other marriages. This is a much easier civil rights claim to argue.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Porras's Avatar
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
I'm your god now.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 1,538

United_States     Wyoming

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

I'm of the opinion that it should be civil unions all around. People want marriage to only be what their religious leader tells them it is, it can stay out of government. You get a civil union which is legally identical to what marriage currently is for the legal aspect, and you get married by your priest, rabbi, swami, etc. for the religious aspect.
__________________
During the journey we commonly forget its goal. Almost every profession is chosen as a means to an end but continued as an end in itself. Forgetting our objectives is the most frequent act of stupidity.
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Wanderer and his Shadow

All good socialists have villas in Southern France. That's not the point.
-Eurosocialist
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Citizen
B.isexual_I.ndependent_T.hespian_V.egeterian_A.nd_P.roud

 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: UK, now the USA
Posts: 1

United     United_States

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Fine, but would civil unions necessarily be inferior? And it also relates to the consequences of holding out for the perfect recognition. I'd rather have less than I want than nothing at all. Civil unions in some states would make it easier to fight DOMA, which would be harder to justify if you have real life, demonstrably committed couples being affected by it.
Quite, why should anyone have to be considered a "life-partner" instead of a spouse? Many sluts, people with open relationships, and others who don't want to take binding-marriage vows choose this as a title. Which feels degrading because you're placed with those who wear relationships, and don't live them.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Secretary of Defense
Weirdo centrist

 
Member Since: Feb 2008
Location: Democratic Republic of Dublin
Posts: 2,034

Ireland     Israel

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Trips View Post
Why does DOMA have to be "fought" ?

Is it worth it over the word ? I thought this was about rights ?
Because of its consequences, like the fact that it means that same sex couples can't pass in their social security on to their partner. Or the fact that the surviving partner has to pay inheritence tax, often leaving them homeless. I'll take a civil union as long as it doesn't mean lesser rights.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
Swoop187's Avatar
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 3,218

United_States     Italy

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hafke View Post
I'm just wondering, because I've recently heard a lot of people express opposition to gay marriage, but not to civil unions. Also, I found some interesting blog posts on the topic:

Wednesday Open Thread: November 4th HillBuzz

Thursday Open Thread: November 5, 2009 HillBuzz

Frankly, I'm a little sick of straight people claiming that dropping the word marriage or compromising in any way would be terrible, mainly because they're not the ones who have to live with the consequences. That said, I have no idea if it would work.

What say you?
I say the way marriage is now its CLEARLY a standard... Its no different then denying a blind man a drivers license because he cant meet the standards required to drive.

IF they want to legalize gay marriage they will have to write an entirely new Amendment for it.

Challenging on the basis of discrimination is fucking stupid and a waste of time.

Its almost as if the gays want gay marriage to be legalized out of sympathy.
__________________
Sic Semper Tyrannis






http://www.myspace.com/swoop187muzic
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 2 Weeks Ago
lug-nut's Avatar
City Council Member
VRWC Pun Czar & Bible Thumper

 
Member Since: Nov 2009
Location: black, unmarked helicopter
Posts: 138

United_States     Texas

Re: Would taking the word "marriage" out of the debate help LGBTs?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swoop187 View Post
I say the way marriage is now its CLEARLY a standard... Its no different then denying a blind man a drivers license because he cant meet the standards required to drive.

IF they want to legalize gay marriage they will have to write an entirely new Amendment for it.

Challenging on the basis of discrimination is fucking stupid and a waste of time.

Its almost as if the gays want gay marriage to be legalized out of sympathy.
They're still demanding special rights.
I am a man and cannot marry another man.
I cannot marry a goat, close relative or a bicycle.
We all have the same rights.
Gays are not interested in just accpetance of their deviant behavior. They demand approval as well.
__________________
Fairness doesn't just happen. It requires the right government policies." -Hillary Clinton


The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

2 Corinthians 4:4

Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

John 14:6
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2000 - 2009 U.S. Politics Online