Thread: Homosexuals and polygamy

Originally Posted by LJ2

I asked for science, anatomy and physiology to be specific. You gave me cupid.

I'm still waiting.

Ummmm, genius....you wrote:

Then show me some real science. Show me a medical school text book, any HS biology book, any anatomical or physiological text that says women's bodies were made for sex with other women or men's bodies were made for sex with men.

I answered:

A woman's body wasn't designed for sexual intercourse with other women and a man's wasn't designed for sexual intercourse with other men. I think we can all agree on that. However, there's far more to making love than just sexual intercourse so it really doesn't matter how the body is designed but rather what the heart says and if two gay people love each other and want to get married, then I believe they should be allowed to.

^^^ Let me tell you something. The parts do fit. If they didn't they'd just give up and do something else LOL

Originally Posted by LJ2

I asked for science, anatomy and physiology to be specific. You gave me cupid.

I'm still waiting.

I'm waiting for a reason why this matters, and a valid respnse to my points.

I'm also waiting for Godot and waiting to find out why its any of your buisness what people get up to in the bedroom, to find out weither or not you agree with hetro-sexual oral and anal sex. But hey, we're all waiting for somehting.

But anyways, they'res a base of nerves near the anus that, when stimulated, can give an orgasm (Hence why people have anal sex). It might not be the purpose of the anus but we use a lot of our organs to do things for which they're not designed.

Originally Posted by Mrs. M

However, there's far more to making love than just sexual intercourse...

I'm bettin' he's never left the lights on...

Originally Posted by LJ2

I asked for science, anatomy and physiology to be specific. You gave me cupid.

I'm still waiting.

Let me put something to you another way: heterosexuals often engage in oral sex, yet by the definitions you describe they are not meant to do this. Therefore are you as opposed to heterosexual oral sex?

I have a general problem with the philosophy that one's personal religious beliefs and direct democracy should determine who gets which rights.

I don't consider that to be an American value.

LJ2... I'm STILL waiting. Its only been 4 pages of your drivel

Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger

I'm waiting for a reason why this matters, and a valid respnse to my points.

I'm also waiting for Godot and waiting to find out why its any of your buisness what people get up to in the bedroom, to find out weither or not you agree with hetro-sexual oral and anal sex. But hey, we're all waiting for somehting.

But anyways, they'res a base of nerves near the anus that, when stimulated, can give an orgasm (Hence why people have anal sex). It might not be the purpose of the anus but we use a lot of our organs to do things for which they're not designed.

If it didn't matter you wouldn't then go on about nerves in your butt pretending that it's a vagina. It's not. There are nerves there so you don't go poop in your pants.

That's the way it is with the rectum. It holds poop. Then people pretend it's for sex and there is damage to the rectum. It bleeds and tears and the penis is contaminated with feces and blood. Then, as you like to point out, they do the oral thing and get poop and blood in their mouth. Hepatitis!

If people expect others to endorse their sexual practices as normal, then they should expect their practices to be examined. You don't want it examined because by anatomical and physiological evidence it's plainly without merit.

Originally Posted by Steve

I'm bettin' he's never left the lights on...

I'm betting he's never had sex!

Originally Posted by LJ2

If it didn't matter you wouldn't then go on about nerves in your butt pretending that it's a vagina. It's not. There are nerves there so you don't go poop in your pants.

No, they're there for a multitude of reasons. Where'd you go to medical school? Jiffy Lube?

That's the way it is with the rectum. It holds poop. Then people pretend it's for sex and there is damage to the rectum. It bleeds and tears and the penis is contaminated with feces and blood. Then, as you like to point out, they do the oral thing and get poop and blood in their mouth. Hepatitis!

Thanks for confirming that you've never actually had sex of any type.

If people expect others to endorse their sexual practices as normal, then they should expect their practices to be examined.

But, of course, you haven't done that.

You don't want it examined because by anatomical and physiological evidence it's plainly without merit.

But, of course, you haven't shown that.

Originally Posted by noahath

Let me put something to you another way: heterosexuals often engage in oral sex, yet by the definitions you describe they are not meant to do this. Therefore are you as opposed to heterosexual oral sex?

Heterosexuals are meant for each other as proved by the abundant evidence of human anatomy and physiology. By that same measure, homosexuals are mismatched.

If you don't care for it, take it up with God, science or Mother Nature. It's not my fault homosexuals have such design flaws.

Originally Posted by LJ2

Heterosexuals are meant for each other as proved by the abundant evidence of human anatomy and physiology. By that same measure, homosexuals are mismatched.

Which, at long last, blows your 'argument' clear out of the water. Given that they're 'meant' for each other, your magic Fairy Land scenario must apply to anal sex as well.

Game. Set. Match.

If you don't care for it, take it up with God, science or Mother Nature. It's not my fault homosexuals have such design flaws.

Science? People here have been referring to Science. You've simply been ignoring it, as usual.

Originally Posted by LJ2

Heterosexuals are meant for each other as proved by the abundant evidence of human anatomy and physiology. By that same measure, homosexuals are mismatched.

If you don't care for it, take it up with God, science or Mother Nature. It's not my fault homosexuals have such design flaws.

One of your main arguments has been that homosexuals are not sexuality compatable (mind you, mind partner would disagree with you); yet if that is the case why don't you object to heterosexual oral sex as this involves people putting their organs into non-campatible parts of anothers body?