Thread: Homosexuals and polygamy

Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3

I'm going to assume you that your English is better than your statistics, in explaining to you that your figure, based on the information you supplied, doesn't apply to all homos.

Don't argue with me about the stats. Do you think 50% is too low? The stats were printed in an article written by a doctor. He's a homosexual.

What do you think of licking someone's anus? Is it a practice we should warn people against? Or should we let people remain ignorant of the risks?

What about the psychological aspect? What does it say about a person who is aroused by putting their tongue in another person's anus? What does it say about a person who would let someone else put their tongue in their anus? Don't they care about that person's health?

Originally Posted by Mrs. M

According to the BIBLE, homosexual sex is among the immoral things. We're not God and we're not perfect so it isn't up to us to judge and that's exactly what you're doing.

If you really want to know, I'm kinda fond of fornicating.

You're making a judgement by accepting the bible. And it's one homosexuals don't like. What else does it say about homosexual activity that you agree with?

Originally Posted by LJ2

Don't argue with me about the stats. Do you think 50% is too low? The stats were printed in an article written by a doctor. He's a homosexual.

What do you think of licking someone's anus? Is it a practice we should warn people against? Or should we let people remain ignorant of the risks?

What about the psychological aspect? What does it say about a person who is aroused by putting their tongue in another person's anus? What does it say about a person who would let someone else put their tongue in their anus? Don't they care about that person's health?

I'm totally convinced that the only sex you've had was with Miss Palmer!

Originally Posted by LJ2

You're making a judgement by accepting the bible. And it's one homosexuals don't like. What else does it say about homosexual activity that you agree with?

I'm not making a judgment, I made a statement. If you want to know what the Bible says, read it.

Originally Posted by Mrs. M

I'm not making a judgment, I made a statement. If you want to know what the Bible says, read it.

I didn't ask you what the bible says. I asked you what else it says about homosexuality that you agree with.

I think you're afraid to answer.

Originally Posted by LJ2

I didn't ask you what the bible says. I asked you what else it says about homosexuality that you agree with.

I think you're afraid to answer.

Afraid to answer? Not in the least. I believe the Bible and since the Bible says that I'm not suppose to judge others, I believe that, too. It also says that fornicating is wrong but I'm quite guilty of it so why would I can if others are doing it?

Originally Posted by Mrs. M

Afraid to answer? Not in the least. I believe the Bible and since the Bible says that I'm not suppose to judge others, I believe that, too. It also says that fornicating is wrong but I'm quite guilty of it so why would I can if others are doing it?

I'm pretty sure the bible says other things about homosexuality. Do you know what it says and do you agree with it?

Originally Posted by LJ2

I'm pretty sure the bible says other things about homosexuality. Do you know what it says and do you agree with it?

The Bible states that homosexual sex is an abomination and I believe that to God it is. I also believe that fornication and adultery are an abomination to God but judging people who fornicate or have homosexual sex is not my job.

Originally Posted by LJ2

If it didn't matter you wouldn't then go on about nerves in your butt pretending that it's a vagina. It's not. There are nerves there so you don't go poop in your pants.

That's the way it is with the rectum. It holds poop. Then people pretend it's for sex and there is damage to the rectum. It bleeds and tears and the penis is contaminated with feces and blood. Then, as you like to point out, they do the oral thing and get poop and blood in their mouth. Hepatitis!

If people expect others to endorse their sexual practices as normal, then they should expect their practices to be examined. You don't want it examined because by anatomical and physiological evidence it's plainly without merit.

first dude, for the large majority of people be they hetero or homo, engaging in oral sex isn't a big deal. Both realize this is not the specific purpose of the mouth(be it sucking on: nipples, sex organ, earlobes, neck, thigh, etc), or main sex organ, yet would agree that they do it on a consistent basis when engaging in what they would universally describe as pleasureable intercourse. And in fact, NORMAL intercourse.
A smaller percentage of people practice anal sex, both heteros and homos. Either group would agree that this is in some way pleasurable. Most would use a form of lube to help the process along, and would freely admit that the purpose of the anus is not to have a dick up it, but that on some level it gives both of them pleasure to do it.
A VERY small percentage (i bet its not even 1 in 100) will willingly engage in oral sex AFTER anal sex if the subject of such (generally themselves) was prepared and cleansed as much as possible by enemas, bleaching etc. (both hetero and homo) both would agree thats pretty esoteric as a pleasurable practice goes, and a large number of these wouldn't truly be stimulated by it and would be doing it for money. but the people receiving it who weren't also being paid would tell you they enjoyed it quite a bit (pretty gross to me but whatever works for you i guess.) and would agree its quite possibly an unsafe behavior.
An EVEN SMALLER PERCENTAGE THAN THE ABOVE, will willingly engage in oral, after anal that is bloody and covered in fecal matter. Probably not more than 1 in 1,000, and again many of those would be paid money to engage in such an act. Many of those would readily admit (along with the rest of us) that it is HIGHLY out of the norm and purpose of both the organs and indeed ones own biology (we don't usually eat shit) and likely to cause disease. yet still some would say they find it pleasurable.
Either way, the supreme court ruled what someone does in the privacy of their own bedroom, between two consenting adults providing that its not murder, slavery, having sex with someone who isn't able to/does not consent to the act IE minors or rape, then its none of yours nor anyone elses, (including the government) damn business.
That establishes that its legal. It also establishes that society as a whole (in the form of the laws of the land) has decided that who you fuck is noones business but yours and theirs.
As to whether or not its "moral" that would depend on your PERSONAL belief structure. Everyone has a different definition for "moral" that they would use to answer that question. Opinions most certainly vary (even among culturally unified sub-groups and indeed even among family units and fraternal twins) , but then opinions always do. The diversity of thought capable by each individual person is truly a humbling thing.
This inability for mankind to think as one discrete entity (which I view as a strength rather than a weakness) and have a simple definition of what was "moral" that has lead to much strife. Dark ages. Crusades. The Holocaust. The extreme violence of the axial age (900 bce to 200 bce. this is ironically when religion turned almost universally to being more about compassion and empathy for your fellow man and natural surroundings in the form of Greek Rationalism, Confucianism and Daoism, Hinduism and Buddhism, and Judean Monotheism, but remains one of the most violent human periods in recorded history.) etc.
This has led, in modern times which for the record is right now, to broad sufferance of a variety of practices under the law (which is the rules of society IE what is acceptable) including homosexuality, and other less than mainstream sexual practice.
Your histrionics fall upon deaf ears sir.

Originally Posted by Mrs. M

According to the BIBLE, homosexual sex is among the immoral things. We're not God and we're not perfect so it isn't up to us to judge and that's exactly what you're doing.

If you really want to know, I'm kinda fond of fornicating.

According to the bible a ham and cheese sandwich is immoral.
People aren't just heterosexual or homosexual, it's like skin color, you are born with your sexuality, and it comes in all shades.
All gay marriage is a recognition of a deep loving relationship, it has nothing to do with gay sex, or the variety of things that one human being can do with another human being.
If anything, gay marriage promotes a commitment to a monogamous relationship, which should get all the people so concerned about the spreading of disease to actively promote it.

Originally Posted by goober

According to the bible a ham and cheese sandwich is immoral.
People aren't just heterosexual or homosexual, it's like skin color, you are born with your sexuality, and it comes in all shades.
All gay marriage is a recognition of a deep loving relationship, it has nothing to do with gay sex, or the variety of things that one human being can do with another human being.
If anything, gay marriage promotes a commitment to a monogamous relationship, which should get all the people so concerned about the spreading of disease to actively promote it.

If Gay Marriage has nothing to do with sex, they should have no problem with marrying someone of the opposite sex. Sex is an important part of marriage.

Originally Posted by LJ2

Why are you so nosey about what other people do? While I make statements that apply to groups, I have made no inquiries about what individuals do.

I didn't want to be part of homosexual's bizarre relationships. They and their apologists demand recognition of them while also demanding that we hide what they demand recognition for. If I had to defend such lunacy I wouldn't want people to examine it either.

Do you object to homosexuals who practice just oral sex then? Once again I wonder what buisness of yours it is that they have anal sex-if they want to why stop them?

Originally Posted by WharfedaleTiger

Do you object to homosexuals who practice just oral sex then? Once again I wonder what buisness of yours it is that they have anal sex-if they want to why stop them?

And what about heterosexuals who have anal sex? This line of "reasoning" opens up a whole line of questioning that I'm not sure anyone particularly wants to explore.