LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Say if I decide to shove my cock into another mans asshole...
Should that give me special legal status?
Why or why not?
Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
President
Post not hijacked in the least. I think that you're taking a similar position to my own.Originally Posted by compote_tom
Well, the more exposure that a woman has to your semen (orally or vaginally) the less likely she is to have eclampsia or toxemia when pregnant.
President
Say if I decide to shove my cock into another mans asshole...
Should that give me special legal status?
Why or why not?
President
You're confused. They cannot be "equivalent in everything except name to heterosexual relationships." except in your own mind of course.
I have to ask you why you continue arguing in support of people destroying themselves ?
Kind of hateful isn't it ?
Every "homosexual" out there isn't a bad person deserving of death you know ? Why are you so hot and bothered to keep encouraging these people to kill themselves ?
Those who wish to promote homosexual behaviour are encouraging people to shorten their life spans.
Is homophobia a choice?
You're trying to change the topic.
Forum Administrator 2012 USPOL Most Valuable Poster (MVP)
The billions of heterosexuals who engage in it say so.
President
Yes. It would make you a rapist. Your status would be "felon." (assuming it's not already)
U.S. Senator
No, but go ahead, be my guest (on someone else).
Vice President
Did you hear that?
It was me, not giving a fuck.
President
CT, if you actually commit to discussing a topic, I'll try, but every time you get caught, you run away or dodge the questions.
The first question that still is outstanding - how does lesbianism equate to suicide?
President
Excellent
So now we know that all these men out there that are sodomiziing one another and passing diseases around are RAPISTS
President
He never said the other man was a willing recipient.
I may "decide" to shove my cock into a vagina, but if that vagina isn't of age, and if the owner isn't willing, I've got all sorts of problems on my hands.
President
Call it whatever is convenient to you
I will not EVER commit to discussing serious topics with people that must always ignore simple facts in order to maintain their position. These same people that accuse me (and others) of things like "run away or dodge ...".
It has been answered here numerous times. Always ignored for your own convenience of course.
It is true that man on man homosexuality is more dangerous and in different ways, but neither practice is safe enough to deserve encouragement.
President
Bend over bitchNo, but go ahead, be my guest (on someone else).
YouTube - Insane Clown Posse - Eminem Ain't Nothing but a Bitch Thang
President
Oh
So we had to make a lot of assumptions to make that statement I see.
Crap, here I was thinking we could go out and arrest all homosexual men
Vice President
Except, of course, that's all you've ever done in the entire history of your posting here.Call it whatever is convenient to you
I will not EVER commit to discussing serious topics with people that must always ignore simple facts in order to maintain their position. These same people that accuse me (and others) of things like "run away or dodge ...".So you have no actual answer, and you run away, tail between your legs, yet again.
It has been answered here numerous times. Always ignored for your own convenience of course.
It is true that man on man homosexuality is more dangerous and in different ways, but neither practice is safe enough to deserve encouragement.
President
Actually, CT, that's the problem. You have NEVER committed to discussing serious topics, because you won't accept that what you believe is not the same thing as what the facts are.Call it whatever is convenient to you
I will not EVER commit to discussing serious topics with people that must always ignore simple facts in order to maintain their position. These same people that accuse me (and others) of things like "run away or dodge ...".
I've got no problem recognizing the research that shows that unprotected anal sex is a significantly risky behavior. That's true whether it's 2 men or 1 man and 1 woman.
Absolutely, patently false. Maybe you told the voices in your head, but you haven't answered the question here. You've just dodged it. As you have again.It has been answered here numerous times. Always ignored for your own convenience of course.
It is true that man on man homosexuality is more dangerous and in different ways, but neither practice is safe enough to deserve encouragement.
And you will in the future.
Posting Permissions
Bookmarks