Visit the Archives for U.S. Politics Online -- U.S. Politics Online . net
Last edited by hairballxavier; 04-07-2010 at 11:54 AM.
I'm not an alcoholic - alcoholics go to meetings.
It seems that some here don't have the foggiest idea what "liberal" means, though.
and then I postedSay if I decide to shove my cock into another mans asshole...
Should that give me special legal status?
Why or why not?
which was in response to your first sentence (rather tongue in cheek, no pun intended) The you postedNo, but go ahead, be my guest (on someone else).
Bend over bitch
YouTube - Insane Clown Posse - Eminem Ain't Nothing but a Bitch Thang
not being a big Eminem fan, I didn't follow the link, but I understood the first line, to which I posted.
I was sure to post the lols to be sure that it was understood that humor was my main intention.Sure, right after you give my 12 guage a rim job, then we'll discuss it.
I don't recall Obama ever being a part of this thread, or part of, what I thought was a humorous exchange between you and I (explanation, if you're gonna tell me to bend over, I'm gonna tell you to French kiss my shotgun).
How in the fuck, did you come up with
Why must every leftist at USPOL constantly suck his dick?
I may be out of line here, but I really don't see it, furthermore, I would love for you to show me anywhere I posted that I was sucking Obama (or anyone else), or that I wanted to, or that I thought it was a good idea. In fact I never brought the current POTUS into this discussion at all. So where the fuck are you coming from?
They sure as hell don't want to think of themselves, or call themselves Authoritrianists, Fascists, Collectivists, Communists or Socialists.
No more than a drunk wants to consider or call him or herself an alcoholic."
I know what liberals were originally. Originally they were nothing like the manipulative fascists that have hijacked todays "liberalism."
It isn't liberalism any more, it is Authoritrianism, Fascism, Collectivism, Communism or Socialism.
Which todays "liberals" don't want to be called of course. Anymore than a drunk wants to consider or call him or herself an alcoholic.
I see your point. It's a term, an ideology, that has been hijacked by a dangerous belief system. It is no longer liberalism and it shouldn't be called that.
I don't see calling it the correct term(s) being widely accepted yet. People aren't ready to accept it. Here's a quote that applies to this I think:
We should not trust popular opinion to determine truth.
Paradigms are broad views that can be either true or false, but people accept them as true. As such they focus attention on those conclusions that will agree with the paradigm and thus restrict any possible innovation outside the paradigm.
Origins, linking science and scripture, Ariel Roth, 1998, pg. 40
If it really is a phobia, it's not by choice, just like a fear of spiders or heights. My guess is this is not a true phobia.
This thread has gone waaay off topic. Closed.