Thread: Is homophobia a choice?

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

Why do you call them "Liberals' when ideologically they are very far from any actual liberal ideology?

They are Authoritrianists, Fascists, Collectivists, Communists, Socialists, etc. etc.

They are NOT "Liberals" in any reasonable sense of that term.

Yes, ok, they call themselves liberals.

They sure as hell don't want to think of themselves, or call themselves Authoritrianists, Fascists, Collectivists, Communists or Socialists.

No more than a drunk wants to consider or call him or herself and alcoholic.

I'm not an alcoholic - alcoholics go to meetings.


It seems that some here don't have the foggiest idea what "liberal" means, though.

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

Why do you call them "Liberals' when ideologically they are very far from any actual liberal ideology?

They are Authoritrianists, Fascists, Collectivists, Communists, Socialists, etc. etc.

They are NOT "Liberals" in any reasonable sense of that term.

They're fascists AND communists?

Where'd you study political theory? A 7-11?

Originally Posted by Captain Trips

Yes, ok, they call themselves liberals.

And every time YOU refer to those various idiots as "librerals" you are only helping them propagate that lie.

Think about it, CT.

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

Why do you not vet Obama in the same manner? Why must every leftist at USPOL constantly suck his dick?

Do you know how foolish that makes you look?

Lemme see, you said

Say if I decide to shove my cock into another mans asshole...

Should that give me special legal status?

Why or why not?

and then I posted

No, but go ahead, be my guest (on someone else).

which was in response to your first sentence (rather tongue in cheek, no pun intended) The you posted

Bend over bitch
YouTube - Insane Clown Posse - Eminem Ain't Nothing but a Bitch Thang
__________________

not being a big Eminem fan, I didn't follow the link, but I understood the first line, to which I posted.

Sure, right after you give my 12 guage a rim job, then we'll discuss it.

I was sure to post the lols to be sure that it was understood that humor was my main intention.

I don't recall Obama ever being a part of this thread, or part of, what I thought was a humorous exchange between you and I (explanation, if you're gonna tell me to bend over, I'm gonna tell you to French kiss my shotgun).

How in the fuck, did you come up with

Why must every leftist at USPOL constantly suck his dick?

I may be out of line here, but I really don't see it, furthermore, I would love for you to show me anywhere I posted that I was sucking Obama (or anyone else), or that I wanted to, or that I thought it was a good idea. In fact I never brought the current POTUS into this discussion at all. So where the fuck are you coming from?

Originally Posted by Tanngrisnir3

They're fascists AND communists?

Fascism and communism are not mutually exclusive terms.

Originally Posted by pramjockey

I'm not an alcoholic - alcoholics go to meetings.

Some of them do, some of them don't.

Originally Posted by pramjockey

It seems that some here don't have the foggiest idea what "liberal" means, though.

I said; "Yes, ok, they call themselves liberals.

They sure as hell don't want to think of themselves, or call themselves Authoritrianists, Fascists, Collectivists, Communists or Socialists.

No more than a drunk wants to consider or call him or herself an alcoholic."

I know what liberals were originally. Originally they were nothing like the manipulative fascists that have hijacked todays "liberalism."

It isn't liberalism any more, it is Authoritrianism, Fascism, Collectivism, Communism or Socialism.

Which todays "liberals" don't want to be called of course. Anymore than a drunk wants to consider or call him or herself an alcoholic.

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

And every time YOU refer to those various idiots as "librerals" you are only helping them propagate that lie.

Think about it, CT.

I see your point. It's a term, an ideology, that has been hijacked by a dangerous belief system. It is no longer liberalism and it shouldn't be called that.

I don't see calling it the correct term(s) being widely accepted yet. People aren't ready to accept it. Here's a quote that applies to this I think:

We should not trust popular opinion to determine truth.

Paradigms are broad views that can be either true or false, but people accept them as true. As such they focus attention on those conclusions that will agree with the paradigm and thus restrict any possible innovation outside the paradigm.

Origins, linking science and scripture, Ariel Roth, 1998, pg. 40

If it really is a phobia, it's not by choice, just like a fear of spiders or heights. My guess is this is not a true phobia.

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

Fascism and communism are not mutually exclusive terms.

You keep tellin' yourself that, Hoss.