Thread: Like traditional values? Yer a hater

Originally Posted by reality

You compared polygamy to evil. Polygamy was participated in by many of the Chosen of God, people who Old Testament Style God interacted with: Abraham Solomon etc. Thats not gymnastics.

Was addressing the suggestion made by J.D. that


"If anything we, with just one wife, are the exception, not the rule, to the point where it appears not just unusual but downright perverted and sick."


You see two person heterosexual marriage is now in the minority, they're now viewed as "downright perverted and sick."

Replacing it is any pair, or grouping of people that feels like shacking up together. "Gays" are attempting to have their deviant sexual forays and "relations" supported and encouraged by the state and given the name "marriage" in American culture.


And they may succeed as confused as people are today.


In todays America, things and ideas that were once thought of as "evil," "dangerous," "criminal," or "sinful" have been gift wrapped, perfumed and renamed, now they're "rights."


These things and ideas are now veiwed as normal and accepted behaviour when they're anything but.


Just because bad behaviours and ideas slowly become accepted by large populations of people, doesn't magically make them GOOD ideas.


That you would like to change the discussion subject to human relations in biblical times is clear. That seems to be a topic for a different thread.

Originally Posted by reality

You compared polygamy to evil. Polygamy was participated in by many of the Chosen of God, people who Old Testament Style God interacted with: Abraham Solomon etc. Thats not gymnastics.

why don't women dream of having a harem of men? It would just mean more people to pick up after.

Originally Posted by redrover

why don't women dream of having a harem of men? It would just mean more people to pick up after.

Some women do. Some women HAVE harems of men. I saw a news story recently about a woman whose twins have two different fathers. It does happen.

Originally Posted by Captain Trips

You see two person heterosexual marriage is now in the minority, they're now viewed as "downright perverted and sick."

Is that so?

I'm sure you have piles of evidence to substantiate that claim?

Originally Posted by gnomon

Is that so?

I'm sure you have piles of evidence to substantiate that claim?

So clever are you

I'm sure you think so

Try following the conversation and the responses, instead of cherry picking a one liner out to comment on.

That's a lame, cheap and weak way to interact on a message board.

Originally Posted by Captain Trips

So clever are you

I'm sure you think so

Try following the conversation and the responses, instead of cherry picking a one liner out to comment on.

That's a lame, cheap and weak way to interact on a message board.

Just checked the last bit of commentary.

It's even worse than I thought it was the first time around.

You misunderstand JD's statements and provide even more imbecilic commentary on top of it.

It' like walking into a public restroom at a gas station, already a dismal adventure, only to find feces smeared on the wall with the initials CT below the smear.

This forum should just bring back the guy who used to post "fjewked" all the time.

Originally Posted by Dragontalk

Some women do. Some women HAVE harems of men. I saw a news story recently about a woman whose twins have two different fathers. It does happen.

I can't imagine that. The toilet seat would NEVER be down. What a pisser!

Originally Posted by gnomon

Just checked the last bit of commentary.

It's even worse than I thought it was the first time around.

You misunderstand JD's statements and provide even more imbecilic commentary on top of it.

It' like walking into a public restroom at a gas station, already a dismal adventure, only to find feces smeared on the wall with the initials CT below the smear.

This forum should just bring back the guy who used to post "fjewked" all the time.

Gosh you're clever.

Smart too.

I feel so dumb ,.. I ..

.....runs off crying

Originally Posted by Dragontalk

I saw a news story recently about a woman whose twins have two different fathers.

That's genetically impossible...

Originally Posted by Steve

That's genetically impossible...

Actually, I saw it too on the news. It´s only recorded less than 10 times or so in history, since they started the whole DNA thing.

Apparently, if the woman has sex with two different men within a very small time-limit, while ovulating, it is possible. Although extremely rare...

Originally Posted by Captain Trips

Was addressing the suggestion made by J.D. that


"If anything we, with just one wife, are the exception, not the rule, to the point where it appears not just unusual but downright perverted and sick."


You see two person heterosexual marriage is now in the minority, they're now viewed as "downright perverted and sick."

Replacing it is any pair, or grouping of people that feels like shacking up together. "Gays" are attempting to have their deviant sexual forays and "relations" supported and encouraged by the state and given the name "marriage" in American culture.


And they may succeed as confused as people are today.


In todays America, things and ideas that were once thought of as "evil," "dangerous," "criminal," or "sinful" have been gift wrapped, perfumed and renamed, now they're "rights."


These things and ideas are now veiwed as normal and accepted behaviour when they're anything but.


Just because bad behaviours and ideas slowly become accepted by large populations of people, doesn't magically make them GOOD ideas.


That you would like to change the discussion subject to human relations in biblical times is clear. That seems to be a topic for a different thread.

Yes trips, I know and KNEW exactly to what you were referring. And you're still not getting it.

JD was trying to point out that in no way is the behavior we participate in now (man/woman marriage) the only way we've ever done it, nor the sole and correct way and in fact to many cultures we would seem backwards.

He didn't actually mean that the union of a man and a woman is sick. He was trying to make a point and it went right over your head because you're too focused on your zealotry.

Originally Posted by redrover

why don't women dream of having a harem of men? It would just mean more people to pick up after.

depends on the culture in question. In some island cultures MEN were the property and women the heads of everything.

Originally Posted by Maddox

Actually, I saw it too on the news. It´s only recorded less than 10 times or so in history, since they started the whole DNA thing.

Apparently, if the woman has sex with two different men within a very small time-limit, while ovulating, it is possible. Although extremely rare...

so basically this chick is the gangbang queen?