And as for Russ being 'easy to beat'.

Just talk to Mitch McConnell, Mark Newmann, and the suckers who put up $30 million (vs Russ's $200K) back in 1998.

Or one Tim Michaels who went back to supervising illegals pouring concrete for his family biz after Nov, 2003.

I love debating liberal loons. I just keep posting facts and they keep ignoring them so they can talk about how great their boy is.

I'm still waiting for any of them on this thread to address mccain-feingold. it won't happen just read my sig to understand all you need to know about liberals.

Varus

Of course it's a good idea. The fact that some people are too stupid to realize that efficiency is not a consittutional argument doesn't mean the issue can be ignored. Republicans will call democrats "weak" on defense and terrorism no matter what democrats do. It worked for them in 2002 and 2004 (against a candidate with the silver star!) and it wasn't true then either. So they will use it until it doesn't work any more.

Maybe. But being "republican lite" hasn't worked for them either.

There is no scenario that benefits the US by making an open ended commitment in Iraq either. It only makes it look like we're too stupid or arrogant to admit this was a bad idea to begin with. Sticking around to serve as targets for every insurgent in Iraq while continuing to make ourselves a laughingstock for our delusional claims of being welcomed as liberators serves no function that I can see.

Varuss,

Please post a 'fact' so we may discuss it.

It's an easy sell; no one seriously believes the Dems can successfully defend this country. H*ll Clintons main concern was cyber crimes; his defense secretary actually came out and said it was more of a concern for national security than islamic terrorists. Of course Dems don't want you to remember this either.

Like I said no one seriously trusts the Dems to protect us from the likes of Islamic terrorists. They simply can't grasp that were we to leave the Islamic terrorists would then be emboldened and those loyal to the US in the ME would have no choice but to join with the terrorists, or be killed.

Varus

But, does not the alleged latest terrorist plot, if true, (I have doubts) disprove the 'Roach Motel' theory?

Take a look at the 25th post on this thread and then tell me Feingold is a champion of freedom and the 1rst amendment.

Varus

25th post is mine, and speaks to the fact that 8% of Russ's voters in 2004 were Republicans.

Please clarify.

That's it, this proves it. I KNOW you two love eachother. You are like brothers constantly wrestling. LOL!!!! You two crack me up.

Yep,

At age 6 we were seperated at the airport by a tall Arabic man named Osama.

Another damned Al Queda plot to prevent the return of our lord and savior, Jesus Christ.

You're right try post 29

Well,

I guess if you consider democracy as a product that can be bought like so-much fish, and that the more money an organization/person has the more influence over what our government does, and the louder their voice SHOULD be heard by said government, then you would say that McCain Feingold is against the overwhelming voice of the wealthy minority. However, consider two facts:

1. That is a minority view, which is called plutocracy.

2. We tried that before, from 1880-1929. Guess where it got us?

Thank you for illustrating my point so completely.

Well, if that is what it takes to force this Pres to follow the law. I must note that Specter was the first to mention this option.
And I don't believe that this particular surveilance involved targets within the US. Furthermore, if my memory serves, I recall O'Reilly during his talk with Chertoff saying that warrants were obtained from FISC in this instance. Chertoff did not deny nor confirm. For what its' worth.******
Just because someone wouldn't fuck Coulter does not make that individual a homosexual. I would have a hell of a time keepin' a stiffy. To do that deed would require a large amount of concentration.
Even though you, yourself, have yet to post any of these so-called "facts"?
Some Cato Institute " opinion " of the McCain-Feingold bill, holds as much sway as, well, your opinion of same. This substitution of fantasy for fact speaks volumes. No need to read your sig.

__________________
Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life

My pleasure; the Dems have zero credibility when it comes to matters of national defense. Clinton gutted the military; in fact it was the only part of the govn that decreased under his tenure.

This is precisely why republicans think they can do whatever they like, spending wise. They know that the people are not going to give the power back to the Dems as long as they have this defeatist, pessimistic, america is the devil attitude.

Varus