[quote=kengle;806872]More names. Don't worry about me friend. I get good spiritual advice every week, from a professional too.

Taking spiritual advice from a liberal is like going to a mechanic who has never owned his own car.

There is no link between 9/11 and Iraq.
Hell yeah! We got the bomb, so let's murder a few millions of innocents. That's what you're talking about: murdering innocents in mass because you dislike a part of the population. I bet Bin Ladin justifies his actions the same way you do.

Animals? Racism now? Perhaps the troops in Iraq should put men, women and children and babies in trains and send them to death camps. Isn't it the best option, in your opinion? The result would be pretty much the same as a nuclear bombing, except there would be no radioactivity contaminating the whole region.

Uh?



Your overall attitude makes me wonder if you're one of the remaining members of the Ku Klux Klan or a leftist in diguise, trying to ruin the reputation of the conservative.

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

There are no innocents in that part of the world, they are brainwashed from birth, its unfortunate. The only way they can be saved is if Jesus saves their souls.

I think I'm the only real conservative on this board.

You mean nazi.

__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months!
Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers.
(Beckett)

More name calling. Don't you guys have anything real to say?

Wait - what the hell am I asking?

Why is it okay for you to engage in name calling but not okay for poster's to call you names?

That, my friend, is one of the signs of trolling.

__________________
My underlines are links -- Please Click

RightisRight

Let's clear this up: If you were given a car laden with explosives, would you end your own life and detonate it in a Middle Eastern market place?


As for the OP:

Many Americans would consider this report to be a result of common sense, but then there are those that would parrot the lines of Bush's speech-writers: "At least we have taken the fight to them over there and not here," for example. But since we understand that the Iraq war has not halted global terrorism at all, and that the strife over there is claiming and ruining countless lives, what do we do now? How do we remedy the situation?

__________________
No man is an island...
Each man's death diminishes me,
Because I am involved in Mankind.
And therefore, never send to know
For whom the bell tolls;
It tolls for thee.
—John Donne

So for those of you that made the assessment, are you suggesting that radicalism didn't start expanding until 2003?

__________________
"I miss the days when they made toys that could kill a kid."
- Jerry Seinfeld

On the contrary. if we had used the bomb. millions perhaps hundreds of millions would be dead. and the world would regress back to the stone age.

Had he listened to the liberals we wouldn't have gone to war.

[quote=Rightisright;806875][quote=kengle;806872]

More names. Don't worry about me friend. I get good spiritual advice every week, from a professional too.


QUOTE] Who, Jerry falwell? or Jessy Jackson??? Howard Stern??? maybe the POPE???

Anyone, (repeat) ANYONE who touts destruction as you do is no Christian. Maybe a Satanist, but-----Not a Christian.

And why would Bush nuke Iraq on 9/12? Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Even Bush has finally admitted that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11. Bombing Iraq on 9/12 would be like, well, invading Iraq a year-and-a-half later - a totally wrong action.

We've already reached that sad milestone. And some lives would have been lost, but most likely not as many as 2600, had Bush concentrated our military efforts in Afghanistan and in capturing or killing bin Laden.

We leave. We remove our military forces, and help Iraq with economic and humanitarian aid. The continued presence of our military isn't helping.

That won't help turn back the clock and somehow reduce the number of terrorists our attack on Iraq helped create, and it won't bring back the 2600 American lives already pissed away. But it will stop the senseless loss of American military lives, and it will remove one of the major causes of increased terrorism in the Middle East.

Bring them home. Bring them home now. Bring them home before any more American lives are pissed away.

You know he is not going to "bring them home now." We can't and we probably never will be able to do that the way things is going. John Mc Caine (though I don't like him too much - he's too liberal for me) is getting the idea. We didn't use enough force. If we wanted to do it all nicey like the liberals want - we need 500,000 men to do that. Bush needs to level with the people. We have to decide if we're going to fight that war or not. If we are going to fight it in a conventional way, we're going to have to have a draft, and it's going to cost a lot more than it is now. Bush messed it up, don't get me wrong. I was for the war, and I still am. Those people in Iraq want nothing more than to kill me, you and your mother. Bush was wrong in thinking we could get Saddam and make them people live like civilized people. They ain't civilized, and if they ain't now, they ain't never going to be civilized. Bush's problem is that he's too much of a pantywaist, and he's influenced by too many immoral people like Wolfawitz and Rice and them. I'm not for affirmative action either, look what it's done to Bush.

There ain't nothing wrong with Iraq that a good H-bomb won't fix. Them people in that part of the world have to understand, and they only understand one thing - power. Nuke Iraq and the rest of them will fall in line, and if they don't drop another one, and another one, until they start to understand who they're talking to. They flew planes into three buildings, were trying for four. We've only destroyed two countries (and only partly), I say they owe us two more. Fry the bastards and let them think about it for awhile and see if they want to attack again. Bush has the power, he's just too chicken to use it.

What needs to be done in Iraq is simple and obvious, and it's exactly what worked before.

Arm the Sunnis and put them in charge, give them tanks and helicopters and jets and cluster bombs to deal with the kurds and shiites.
Call the new "Supreme Leader" a great friend of democracy, let him promise elections "once things settle down". And don't be too critical of the large numbers of Kurds and Shiites that will need composting, to "get the situation under control". And we get the hell out, so our presence doesn't play into the hands of the islamic movement. And we can "regret" the brutality that the new regime uses to establish security, without getting too much blood on our hands.

The Sunni's are the natural ally of a great power that wants to dominate Iraq, because they don't have oil in their area, so they need the Kurdish area to remain Iraq, and they hate Iran, so they keep the Shiites down, which is sort of exactly what we need, someone that will sell us oil, in exchange for the one thing we still make, high tech weaponry.
Someone who will crush the Kurds and the Shiites, who isn't us.
But someone who needs us, and someone that will keep Iran worried about their neighborhood, so they won't have as much time to spend on the "Israeli Problem".

__________________
“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine.”

Senator Thad Cochran, Mississippi (R)
on McCain

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico (R)
on McCain

“My anger did not help my campaign ... People don’t like angry candidates very much.”

McCain on McCain

I wasn't aware that Jesus was in favor of violently killing many thousands of people based on their geographical location.

__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.

Sometimes doing God's work is hard. Buck up buddy and realize - these people would kill you in a minute and your mother too.

Fry them first!