Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
goober's Avatar
goober goober is online now
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,332

   
White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Sept. 28, 2006 — A Congressional report due out tomorrow is expected to show now-convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff and his associates had far more extensive contacts with the White House than President Bush's staff ever acknowledged.

The report from the Republican-led House Government Affairs Committee will state that Abramoff had as many as 450 contacts with the White House, and prime among his lobbying targets was former White House political director Ken Mehlman, and Bush's adviser Karl Rove.
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2505039&page=1

as Gomer Pyle used to say "Surprise, Surprise, Surprise".

Imagine the Bush Whitehouse linked to a huge corruption scandal, just a scant 6 weeks before the mid term elections.

Coming from the Republican dominated House Government Affairs Committee, you have to imagine that they try to present this in the most favorable light possible.
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

But Bush said he doesn't know Abramoff! Yet Karl Rove was his prime target. Could it be that Bush has been dishonest with us? No, impossible.

Quote:
The investigation is based on a detailed examination of the billing records and the e-mails the committee received from Abramoff and his associates, which indicated far more extensive contacts than investigators were led to believe in the past between the lobbyist and both the White House and the Republican National Committee.

It also presents circumstantial evidence that Abramoff was able to have some action taken on behalf of his clients and details offers from Abramoff and his associates of dinners, concert tickets and other meals and drinks to White House officials.
Quote:
But it remains to be seen if there were any instances of illegal lobbying and if the alleged offers to White House officials of concert tickets, meals violated the gift ban.

The White House also points out that this investigation is largely based on Abramoff's billing records and e-mails and that he's been shown to have lied in the past.

Abramoff and his business partner, Adam Kidan, both pled guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud in March, and were each sentenced to five years and 10 months in federal prison. Abramoff's sentence is scheduled to begin Nov. 15.
Hmmmm meals and concert tickets violating the gift ban? Ya think?
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-28-2006
interested's Avatar
interested interested is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Pintvile
Posts: 660

Northern     South_Dakota

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

er.......... I watched the hearings. Did you know he was supporting a sniper training camp for teens in Israel, with Indian money?
__________________
The Best Satire Awards

http://www.thebestsatireawards.com/
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Hail to the king, baby!

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,570

Colorado     United_States

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=2505039&page=1

as Gomer Pyle used to say "Surprise, Surprise, Surprise".

Imagine the Bush Whitehouse linked to a huge corruption scandal, just a scant 6 weeks before the mid term elections.

Coming from the Republican dominated House Government Affairs Committee, you have to imagine that they try to present this in the most favorable light possible.
I would have never guessed, I mean this administration has been soooo honest and forthcoming. [/sarcasm off]
__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
FreeThinker's Avatar
FreeThinker FreeThinker is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,932

   
Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

i heard 485 different meetings/contacts with WH officials and abramoff.. and WH had declared only a handful earlier.. saying 6 or 8 times( not sure) -.. but instead of taht low number, the actual number of meetings have been close to 500 !!!

something REALLY stinks
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
pretzel pretzel is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: valley forge pa area
Posts: 127

United_States    
Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Personally, I don't think the 485 or 500 would represent actual visits. If Abramoff is billing clients, he would bill to them any little think (i.e. e-mail, phone calls, faxes, etc.) so I'm pretty sure he didn't visit the WH that many times. But, by the token, we know that the WH logs were incomplete as requested by the various committees investigating Abramoff. I've heard of 100 visits to the WH since Bush was first elected however the logs don't show who Abramoff was visiting. I'm absolutely convinced he only met Bush a few times (he would have been given this priveledge as a "Bush Pioneer") but my guess he mostly met with policy aides.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by pretzel View Post
Personally, I don't think the 485 or 500 would represent actual visits. If Abramoff is billing clients, he would bill to them any little think (i.e. e-mail, phone calls, faxes, etc.) so I'm pretty sure he didn't visit the WH that many times. But, by the token, we know that the WH logs were incomplete as requested by the various committees investigating Abramoff. I've heard of 100 visits to the WH since Bush was first elected however the logs don't show who Abramoff was visiting. I'm absolutely convinced he only met Bush a few times (he would have been given this priveledge as a "Bush Pioneer") but my guess he mostly met with policy aides.
I agree. 485 times is a lot, but it really doesn't matter. How many other Jeff Gannons and Jack Abramoff's are there in the W.H.? Without a Democrat led investigation we'll never know the true answer.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
pretzel pretzel is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: valley forge pa area
Posts: 127

United_States    
Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by reino View Post
I agree. 485 times is a lot, but it really doesn't matter. How many other Jeff Gannons and Jack Abramoff's are there in the W.H.? Without a Democrat led investigation we'll never know the true answer.
I agree that the nature of both Gannon and Abramoff visits should be looked at. If Abramoff was acting purely as a lobbyist and there wasn't the quid pro quo's then I'd have to admit that there isn't really isn't a whole lot that can be done. Like it or not, President's also have to be loyal to the Party faithful and if that means photo-ops for the high rollers then who cares. If, on the other hand, Abramoff's visits entailed large campaign donations (or other things of value) in favor of support for specific legislation on behalf of their clients, then that's a whole new ballgame.

What will be hilarious is if the Dem's do take the House and start investigating why Gannon or Abramoff spent so much time at the WH (and it'll be interesting to correlate the visits to when the President was actually there) the reaction of the Rep. and their own Clintonian defenses rearing their ugly heads again.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
trailblazer's Avatar
trailblazer trailblazer is offline
High Chancellor
The People's Democratic Republic of Me

 
Member Since: Nov 2004
Location: West of the Atlantic
Posts: 3,015

Liberia     Earth

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Total hogwash. George W. Bush is a Christian. Christians are not supposed to be corrupt.

I don't know what Abramoff is, but his name sound like he's probably a Jew.
__________________

"Do what I say or I'll hold my breath til you turn blue!"
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by pretzel View Post
I agree that the nature of both Gannon and Abramoff visits should be looked at. If Abramoff was acting purely as a lobbyist and there wasn't the quid pro quo's then I'd have to admit that there isn't really isn't a whole lot that can be done. Like it or not, President's also have to be loyal to the Party faithful and if that means photo-ops for the high rollers then who cares. If, on the other hand, Abramoff's visits entailed large campaign donations (or other things of value) in favor of support for specific legislation on behalf of their clients, then that's a whole new ballgame.

What will be hilarious is if the Dem's do take the House and start investigating why Gannon or Abramoff spent so much time at the WH (and it'll be interesting to correlate the visits to when the President was actually there) the reaction of the Rep. and their own Clintonian defenses rearing their ugly heads again.
I agree wholeheartedly. While there should be investigation the conservative media bias will try and make it look as though it's just spin to derail progress. The first thing Dems should do when/if they take office is to handle immigration. Then focus on how redeploying troops to Afganistan and the border. An investigation needs to be done, but only after a few years.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
pretzel pretzel is offline
Town Council Member

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: valley forge pa area
Posts: 127

United_States    
Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by reino View Post
I agree wholeheartedly. While there should be investigation the conservative media bias will try and make it look as though it's just spin to derail progress. The first thing Dems should do when/if they take office is to handle immigration. Then focus on how redeploying troops to Afganistan and the border. An investigation needs to be done, but only after a few years.

As to the first part, the media will do only that which they feel will get them ratings. If they smell blood in the water they'll have it front and center. They do their polling just as much as the political parties do.

As for their agenda it will depend solely on their ability to gain control of both bodies of Congress. They could pass all the legislation they want but if they can't control the agenda of both the House and Senate, very little will be done and in either case, they won't have the veto proof majority in the Senate and you'll probably end up seeing alot of vetoes and compromise legislation. The best they can do will be to get on tv and argue that the other side isn't compromising.

My own personal opinion is that if the Dem's take control of the House they'll be able to make live miserable for Bush. You'll end up seeing a 2 year lame duck session and constant mud slinging on the air waves.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
FreeThinker's Avatar
FreeThinker FreeThinker is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,932

   
Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

some mroe details:

http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/new...060928&src=abc

Of those 485 contacts, 345 were described as meetings or other in-person contacts; 71 were described as phone conversations and 69 were e-mail exchanges.

for more info.. click link above..
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by FreeThinker View Post
some mroe details:

http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/new...060928&src=abc

Of those 485 contacts, 345 were described as meetings or other in-person contacts; 71 were described as phone conversations and 69 were e-mail exchanges.

for more info.. click link above..
Interesting. I figured of those meetings most of them would have been e-mails and such, but that's really quite the opposite.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Hail to the king, baby!

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,570

Colorado     United_States

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by trailblazer View Post
Total hogwash. George W. Bush is a Christian. Christians are not supposed to be corrupt.
What the hell are you talking about? He may claim to be a chrtistian, but his actions prove otherwise.
__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
MattLarson's Avatar
MattLarson MattLarson is online now
Moderator, Bulk Rate
Fear my squirrelly wrath!!!!

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 27,080

United_States     Florida

Re: White House-Abramoff Contacts More Extensive Than Thought, Report Says

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danno View Post
What the hell are you talking about? He may claim to be a chrtistian, but his actions prove otherwise.
Trailblazer is just trolling. He's apparently decided to adopt some ultra-right wing persona and act up to get people going.

Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online