Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Jeff Jeff is offline
Citizen

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada
Posts: 20

United_States     Nevada

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
Dude, lots of Americans value human rights. This sucks. You have no idea how much this sucks for me. I'm losing lots of respect for this country.

I am as well losing respect for this country. It's beyond shameful.
__________________
Always cherish the little things in life, Never take them for granted.

George bush reminds me of a mad scientist with the IQ of an pimple, Impeach that SOB.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Gort's Avatar
Gort Gort is offline
President
Badges? We don need no stinkin badges

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: 42.88 85.52
Posts: 10,280

United_States     Germany

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by doniston View Post
100% against, and I don't just mean myself. ever one of the posters so far responding are saying the same thing. I will be very curious to see how the American public veiws this. our congress has become a facist camp. Come december, I hope the congress reveiws, and overturns these last two bills.

Obviously Bush will sign it But I wonder if either of them will pass muster with the supreme court.

IMO, Every Senator and every Representative who voted for either one should be turned out of office,and/or tried as traitors. as should be BUSH.
The sad truth is this will not even appear on the radar screen in Novemeber. The issues will be Iraq, the economy, and terrorism. How we treat those we have captured in the war on terrorism will only be important to a few. That is the sad state of affairs we find ourselves in.

However on the brightside, I believe despite the administrations best efforts to make terrorism the number one issue that place will in fact be held by Iraq. If that is the case then the admin and its supporters loose. In in 08 it remains Iraq it will almost be a certainty that the more moderate element in the US will once again take oer Congress and the Presidency then this piece of crap bill can be repealed. Even if Dems and moderate repubs get the majority in 06 there won't be enough to override a Bush veto if a new bill tries to change this one. The other thing this bill does as I understand it is give Bush and his cohorts amnesty for pretty much anything they have done so far. The bill will be challenged in court, of that there is no doubt. However it is not likely to be found unconstitutional due to the congressional stamp of approval. The USSC traditionally is a lot more comfortable with this type of thing as long as it has the support of both branches.
__________________

The universe grows smaller every day and the threat of aggression by any group anywhere can no longer be tolerated. There must be security for all or no one is secure... - Klaatu
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
biggyg2's Avatar
biggyg2 biggyg2 is offline
Secretary of Defense
derka derka derka

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: KANSAS CITY
Posts: 3,147

United_States     Texas

Re: Detainee bill passed

Kinda pissed me off.

I went out and found the Senate Vote counts for this Amendment.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...vote=00259#top
__________________
I want to change the world but they won't give me the source code.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggyg2 View Post
Kinda pissed me off.

I went out and found the Senate Vote counts for this Amendment.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...vote=00259#top
Partisan issue, isn't it? Only one Republican voted nay.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Patrick Leahy (D) VT on the detainee bill

Patrick Leahy is one of my all time favorite Senators. If you remember, he is the one who Cheney told to go fuck yourself when Leahy asked Cheney questions about Halliburton's no bid contracts in Iraq. Patrick Leahy is a true American, constitution loving, patriotic Senator.

Quote:
AMY GOODMAN: On Thursday, Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont condemned the legislation from the floor of the Senate.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: It grieves me to think that three decades in this body that I stand here in the Senate, knowing that we’re thinking of doing this. It is so wrong. It is unconstitutional. It is un-American. It is designed to ensure the Bush-Cheney administration will never again be embarrassed by a United States Supreme Court decision reviewing its unlawful abuses of power. The Supreme Court said, ‘You abused your power.’ He said, ‘Ha, we’ll fix that. We have a rubber stamp, a rubber stamp, Congress, that will just set that aside and give us power that nobody, no king or anybody else set foot in this land, ever thought of having.’

AMY GOODMAN: Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy speaking Thursday prior to the vote. He joins us now on the telephone. Welcome to Democracy Now!

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: Thank you. It’s good to be with you.

AMY GOODMAN: It’s good to have you with us, Senator. Now, if you could explain exactly what this bill that the Senate has just approved with a number of Democrats joining with the Republicans, what exactly it does.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: First off, as you probably gathered from what I was saying on the floor, it’s a terrible bill. It removes as many checks and balances as possible so that any president can basically set the law, determine what laws they’ll follow and what laws they’ll break and not have anybody be able to question them on it.

In this case, the particular section I was speaking about at that point was the so-called habeas protection. Now, habeas corpus was first brought in the Magna Carta in the 1200s. It’s been a tenet of our rights as Americans. And what they're saying is that if you’re an alien, even if you’re in the United States legally, a legal alien, may have been here ten years, fifteen years, twenty years legally, if a determination is made by anybody in the executive that you may be a threat, they can hold you indefinitely, they could put you in Guantanamo, not bring any charges, not allow you to have a lawyer, not allow you to ever question what they’ve done, even in cases, as they now acknowledge, where they have large numbers of people in Guantanamo who are there by mistake, that they put you -- say you’re a college professor who has written on Islam or for whatever reason, and they lock you up. You’re not even allowed to question it. You’re not allowed to have a lawyer, not allowed to say, “Wait a minute, you’ve got the wrong person. Or you’ve got -- the one you’re looking for, their name is spelled similar to mine, but it’s not me.” It makes no difference. You have no recourse whatsoever.

This goes so much against everything we've ever done. Now, we’ve had some on the other side say, ‘Well, they're trying to give rights to terrorists.’ No, we’re just saying that the United States will follow the rules it has before and will protect rights of people. We’re not giving any new rights. We’re just saying that if, for example, if you picked up the wrong person, you at least have a chance to get somebody independent to make that judgment.

AMY GOODMAN: Senator Leahy, on this issue of habeas corpus, I want to play a clip from yesterday’s Senate debate and have you respond. This is Republican Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama.

SEN. JEFF SESSIONS: It was never, ever, ever, ever intended or imagined that during the War of 1812, that it British soldiers were captured burning of the Capitol of the United States, as they did, that they would have been given habeas corpus rights. It was never thought to be. habeas corpus was applied to citizens, really, at that time, and I believe that that’s so plain as to be without dispute.

AMY GOODMAN: Republican Senator Jeff Sessions. Senator Leahy, your response.

SEN. PATRICK LEAHY: Well, I wish it was as plain as he says. Of course, in the Hamdan decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has made it very clear that it is available in somebody captured. In a case like what he was talking about, if somebody had been captured there and held in prison, and they said, “You have the wrong person,” they could at least raise it. And you also have, of course, under the Constitution, that habeas can be suspended if there is an invasion, if there is an insurrection. We have neither case here. Even the most conservative Republican legal thinkers have said this is not a case to suspend habeas corpus.

You know, they can set up all the straw men they want, but the fact is this allows the Bush administration to act totally arbitrarily with no court or anybody else to raise any questions about it. It allows them to cover up any mistakes they make. And this goes beyond just marking everything “secret,” as they do now. Every mistake they make, they just mark it “secret.” But this is even worse. This means somebody could be locked up for five years, ten years, fifteen years, twenty years. They have the wrong person, and they have no rights to be able to say, “Hey guys, you’ve got the wrong person.” It goes against everything that we’ve done as Americans.

You know, when things like this were done during the Cold War in some of the Iron Curtain countries, I remember all the speeches on the Senate floor, Democrats and Republicans alike saying, “How horrible this is! Thank God we don’t do things like this in America.” I wish they’d go back and listen to some of their speeches at that time.

AMY GOODMAN: Senator Leahy, this was not a close vote: 65 to 34. The twelve Democrats who joined with the Republicans, except for Senator Chafee of Rhode Island, the twelve Democrats are Tom Carper of Delaware, Tim Johnson of South Dakota, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey, as well as Senator Menendez of New Jersey, Bill Nelson of Florida, Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Senator Pryor of Arkansas, Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Ken Salazar of Colorado, Debbie Stabenow of Michigan and Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut. They joined with the Republicans. You are working very hard to get a Democratic majority in the Senate in these next elections and in Congress overall. What difference would it make?

More here
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggyg2 View Post
Kinda pissed me off.

I went out and found the Senate Vote counts for this Amendment.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LI...vote=00259#top
Thanks for the link, good to know. I hope all the yeas get voted out if they are up for vote. I wonder why Olympia Snowe didn't vote?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Patrick Leahy (D) VT on the detainee bill

If everyone remembers, Patrick Leahy was one of the victims of the Senate Anthrax threat.

That happened after he sent a couple letters like this one:

http://www.justacitizen.com/articles...oft_7-9-04.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Partisan issue, isn't it? Only one Republican voted nay.
And Lieberman voted yea. I sure hope Lamont takes that seat.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Patrick Leahy (D) VT on the detainee bill

They never did catch that anthrax terrorist did they?
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
goober's Avatar
goober goober is offline
President

 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: massachusetts
Posts: 10,329

   
Re: Patrick Leahy (D) VT on the detainee bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samantha View Post
They never did catch that anthrax terrorist did they?
No, Karl still works in the White House
__________________
“ The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state.”

Adam Smith , The Wealth of Nations 1776

"We have always known that heedless self-interest was bad morals; we know now that it is bad economics"
FDR's second Inaugural Address
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
Thematic-Device Thematic-Device is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 5,382

United_States     Connecticut

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Samantha View Post
What did your Senators do?
Lieberman is too busy cowering in a corner to grow a spine and to stand up for American values. But what can we expect, the "moral" candidate who is too worried about violent video games to oppose torture, supports the removal of habaes corpus. Treason is a good word for it.

At least Dodd is a true american.

Quote:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
It seems that a large number of the senate forgot their oaths.
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 09-29-2006
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Patrick Leahy (D) VT on the detainee bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by goober View Post
No, Karl still works in the White House
It does fit his MO.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2006
doniston's Avatar
doniston doniston is offline
Permanently Banned
Just getting better HEH HEH

 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: southern Cal
Posts: 10,548

United_States     United

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thematic-Device View Post
Lieberman is too busy cowering in a corner to grow a spine and to stand up for American values. But what can we expect, the "moral" candidate who is too worried about violent video games to oppose torture, supports the removal of habaes corpus. Treason is a good word for it.

At least Dodd is a true american.



It seems that a large number of the senate forgot their oaths.
I agree and while I can understand the political reasons for the republicans to side with the Administration (tho I strongly disagree) n There is absolutely NO excuse for democrats to have voted yes fo this horrendous miscarraige. I hope that the citizens rise up and throw out everyone possible in the Senate, and everyone in the house that supported either it. or the previous monstrosity regarding wire-taping..
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2006
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 14,406

United_States     Texas

Re: Detainee bill passed

Wow what a feast all of you must be having! every single post bashes this bill as best i can tell!

Well far be it from to stop the party here! I agree with you all, this bill does suck, it doesn't give the President nearly enough power to fight this war and it is indeed disgraceful!

Incredible, never in my life have i seen a thread like this!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 09-30-2006
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Detainee bill passed

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
Wow what a feast all of you must be having! every single post bashes this bill as best i can tell!

Well far be it from to stop the party here! I agree with you all, this bill does suck, it doesn't give the President nearly enough power to fight this war and it is indeed disgraceful!

Incredible, never in my life have i seen a thread like this!
Yes, the President deserves to have unmonitored power to torture people based solely on suspicion. That is the whole point of the three branch system as opposed to a monarchy.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online