If you think information contrary to your beliefs is abhorent garbage, then you have serious credibility problems. You are the one who is partisan. The statements you come up with make me think you would have fitted well into the mold of a stormtrooper in nazi germany.

blind devotion and obedience to the state, and a willingness to disregard the humanity of others rather than question the propagada you are taught.

As to your brave troops, while wishing no disrespect to your servicemen, it doesn't take courage to fire on fleeing vehicles.

I am not standing up for NK or Iran, simply saying that if I were in the position where YOUR GOVERNMENT had labelled me as a potential threat, I would arm myself to protect myself against them.

I definitely would not trust your government.

There have been plenty of cases globally where US troops get off with nothing more than a slap on the wrist because they are protected from international law. this makes them extremely dangerous to civilians, and also to soldiers retreating, as happened along miles and miles of highway in GWI.

As long as your guys are posturing, the best defence is to ensure strength enough to discourage US troops coming into your country. The best defences are probably nuclear, and a well armed military.

This means heavy investment in military resources rather than spending money on infrastructure and services for the people.

After looking at the madness of King George over the last 5 years, I'm not so sure KJI is half as mad as he's made out to be.

No, I am saying that even the suggestion of a legitimate reason for "the bad haired guy" to be developing nuclear weapons because the United States doesn't trust well established american-hating international bodies to hand down their view of justice on our troops is.

You mean like blindly taking the word of a coroner that something you have no substantial information about yourself as authoritative...rather than giving the benefit of the doubt to people putting their lives on the line?

No, but it takes a hell of alot just to BE THERE in the first place!

Propter Hoc ergo Post Hoc. This ignores the reality that the REASON they were identified as a potential threat was BECAUSE they were trying to get nuclear weapons. That's like saying it is perfectly understandable why the bank robber doesn't want to put his gun down once the SWAT team arrives and has guns pointed at him. The fact of the matter is that the holding of the gun RESULTED IN and not FROM the arrival of the SWAT team.

I don't "trust" any government, but I certainly DISTRUST governments other than my own far more.


Few and far between. The overwhelming majority of U.S. servicemen and women who commit crimes are released to the authorities of that jurisdiction...save for those whose guarantees of due process are so utterly non-existent as to be unnacceptable for those who would volunteer for our armed forces.

Utterly oblivious. I suspose you felt the Soviets where merely reacting to U.S. postering during the cold war, didn't you? That if only we had disarmed first, the Soviet's would have seen that we didn't mean them any harm and would have disarmed as well. It was childishly naive way of viewing evil regimes then, and it is even more so now.

__________________
"It's a good feeling to shoot a bad guy. Something you democrats would never understand. Americans are homesteaders, we want a safe home, keep the money we make, and shoot bad guys!"

----Denny Crane

Hm. What a curious statement to make, since you've already been informed there won't be a trial under international law. Which, of course, you already knew on beforehand. And I would bet good money there won't be a trial under US law either. And yet, you are arguing for justice? Would you then join me in calling for a trial?
No, it's just under US law it's legally permissable to stall a proceeding indefinitely for no reason. It's also only under US law it's almost encouraged to change the alleged crime during the trial, as well as bring alternate defenses to alternate prosecutions in order to have your sentence reduced. However, none of this is allowed under US military law, which is a very stringent process that does not take into account more than a specific kind of crime, etc.

And this, as if you did not know, is the reason why US soliders will not be prosecuted for murder under the courts martial system in cases such as these. That is, in favour of an inquest that simply seeks to determine whether the ROE was followed. Such a curious system of "justice", isn't it. Reliable, of course, but curious nonetheless.

If American troops are shooting up minivans full of civilians, they should be investigated and tried by the US legal system, if the US legal system ignores this , the UK should pull out of Iraq, they are going to anyway, the last helicopter out of the Green Zone will be American just like Vietnam.

__________________
“The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine.”

Senator Thad Cochran, Mississippi (R)
on McCain

“I decided I didn’t want this guy anywhere near a trigger.”
Senator Pete Domenici, New Mexico (R)
on McCain

“My anger did not help my campaign ... People don’t like angry candidates very much.”

McCain on McCain

Was the van marked as that of the news group?

And Michel Moore television.
Liberal groups in America had 13,000 tapes of Mooron 911 translated to Arabic and sent to there television channels where it was played up to 7 times a day…

I don’t care if it was the freaking Oscar Myer wiener mobile. It was during a gun battle where the enemy was in a fire fight with our troops. They all jumped in the van and tried to get away. The inquest wasn’t real. The dumbass was hit by both Iraqi and American fire while covering the battle from the enemies side.
There are no sites stating other then it being a British inquest. An inquest into a war occurrence without mentioning which group did it suggests some anti-war organization of moonbat credibility. The story is spam from some anti-American group.

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

Truth died along with God in 1969 on the front page of the New York Times.

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

What is it trying to be planted here?
We saw a British journalist and started firing at him??? The troops were cowards and just shot at everything moving???
Has this appalling hate and lying toward America become so normalized to people that we miss the magnitude of what it is you are doing.
I’m sorry, but there are people in the world of intellectual level that could believe these propagations. You people are causing deaths, extending the war and creating chaos throughout the world with these lies.

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

Touché…
(Watch them come back and say it’s a magical coroner…)

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

Your close to the real agenda behind theses movements.
It’s over, president Bush had stopped Al Quada and Iraq’s efforts making the world safer again. It was time to leave.
Liberals can’t allow that type of information getting to the people of the world. There keeping enemy recruitment lines open and U.S. image down with propaganda campaigns for the soul propose of political empowerment of there ideology. There gonna be in for surprise number three in November. (But but, the news said- )

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

Seems rather dismal, care to expound. You have certianly piqued my interest...

__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam

Indeed: http://www.macgregorministries.org/j...reatdisap.html

(For something of historical value it sure was hard to find…)

__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.

Coroners do not have the ability to declare anyone guilty of a crime...much less declare what the motive was.

__________________

Would you look at that. Another conservative funnymentalist who will join me in calling for a trial.

Any action involving military fire and civilians that cannot possibly be the results of collateral damage should be investigated fully and a trial conducted if necessary. This incident is not as if a drone dropped a weapon on a target and civilian casualties resulted as collateral damage.

Burying firefights or the evnts leading to firing upon civilians in close-contact is detrimental to the reputation of our soldiers. Nothing good can come of it.

The reputation of the soldiers on the ground AS A WHOLE are at stake constantly.

It should be out in the open unless its disclosure is a matter of national security...as in the information puts our country at a tangible risk.

__________________