Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Anyone ask Hillary what kind of underwear she wears, yet? Lt. Gov Diane Denish on Bill Richardson "The governor, she said, "pinches my neck. He touches my hip, my thigh, sort of the side of my leg." |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
![]() Neither was it a head on collision as in the case of the Pentagon. It flew sideways and basically hit the appartment building with a wing.
__________________
"Say not, 'When I have free time I shall study'; for you may perhaps never have any free time" Hillel the Elder |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
I did the maths on the hole/plane thingy a while ago on this very site. It's somewhere in the archives if you're interested. Bottom line was that the hole is consistent with the type of plane and the angle at which it hit the pentagon.
__________________
"Say not, 'When I have free time I shall study'; for you may perhaps never have any free time" Hillel the Elder |
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
Gem Gem
__________________
There is no political solution to our troubled evolution. "Reality, the left-wing liberal conspiracy. " Credited to Angry American. |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
And how the hell could there have only been a sixteen foot hole regardless of whether it was a missile or a plane? A missile if anything would have done much more damage to the first ring and not penetrated as deep because they are designed to explode on impact. If it was the type of missile that was designed to detonate after penetrating the structure, the damage would have been centralized in the inner rings. Of course there is then the trajectory from which the building was hit. A missile flies in a general arc, however what hit the Pentagon flew in at a relatively flat angle, one that is not consistent with the flight of a missile. |
|
|||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Crystal, you showed me an explosion. We all know about the explosion. We'd like to see a plane actually hitting the Pentagon. The Pentagon is fortified with cameras and you can't show me a plane.
None of you can show me a plane and never will. |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
As the wings and the tail did not break the wall, where are they? Even the engines did not go through as there was only one hole in the center where the body of the plane was. Thus, the engines disappeared also.
I don't believe in any stories saying that there were plane parts around - I have not seen any in the numerous pictures from the place. The nice principle is that if there is no evidence to show, there is no evidence. It is the same with the Pennsylvania crash - the plane has clearly been shot down as the fragments are all over and no wreck can be seen. Where is the plane? But if there was some plane, many other questions remain: quote: It is likely, but unprovable, that some form of remote control technology was used to steer Flight 77 into the nearly empty, recently reconstructed part of the Pentagon. Even an expert pilot substituted for flight school dropout and alleged terrorist Hani Hanjour would not have made the amazing flight pattern to minimize casualties on the ground by hitting the nearly empty part of the Pentagon. Whether or not remote control was used, the primary issues are: * why the plane was not intercepted (even after the second tower was hit), * how it hit the nearly empty part of the Pentagon, and * why planes scrambled from Norfolk flew the wrong way (over the ocean) and were too late to protect the headquarters of the Trillion Dollar Air Force. And why the black boxes have not been given to the professionals - they have been found but kept secret.... "Pentagon missile" hoax distracts and discredits the 9/11 skeptics Last edited by Analyst; 12-07-2006 at 05:11 AM. |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Precisely. Because you don't want to see it, and will claim not to have seen it even when it has been clearly shown to you.
Matt
__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
__________________
Client: In six days, do you hear me, six days, God made the world. And you are not bloody well capable of making me a pair of trousers in three months! Tailor: But my dear Sir, my dear Sir, look at the world, and look at my trousers. (Beckett) |
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
Quote:
wow that is awesome
|
|
||||
|
Re: Flight 77 Video Released: No Plane
I was going to post a picture of a plane but I kept getting an upload error.
__________________
Anyone who thinks freedom comes cheap, please put the blindfold on and stand against the wall. Many times I believe Americans will have to take back the country and start a new government. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|