Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack (3) Thread Tools Display Modes
  #256 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,204

United_States     California

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

BTW homelessness has very very little to do with lack of job opportunities and pay and 99% to do with drug and/or alcohol addiction.
Reply With Quote
  #257 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
IronMaiden27's Avatar
IronMaiden27 IronMaiden27 is offline
Secretary of Defense
All Your Base Are Belong to Us

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,472

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

I will repeat myself again: additional jobs will make prices go up because the businesses will have to pay out more money to the employees. The "work or get nothing" policy would not work in this country. We would be in the same situation with lack of jobs and then it would get progressively worse from there on out. For everyone.

I don't know where you are getting I am in denial. I'm being very logical.
__________________
Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

- George Orwell, 1984
Reply With Quote
  #258 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Calvin X Calvin X is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 605

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert View Post
BTW homelessness has very very little to do with lack of job opportunities and pay and 99% to do with drug and/or alcohol addiction.
or mental illness.
Reply With Quote
  #259 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
IronMaiden27's Avatar
IronMaiden27 IronMaiden27 is offline
Secretary of Defense
All Your Base Are Belong to Us

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,472

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by jpsartre12 View Post
No, but you could tie their tubes as a pre-condition to receiving Welfare.

The ghettos are populated with Welfare babies and grandbabies. That's one of the biggest problems. And you want to INCREASE Welfare programs?! That's like throwing kerosene on a burning fire.

Or be prepared to make tyhe tough decisions and stop subsidizing irresponsibility. If you can't afford kids, don't have them!!


What you described above is happening TODAY. Where do you live?
And it will get even worse. You can't tie people's tubes. It's a violation of personal privacy and wellbeing. I never said I wanted to increase welfare programs.
__________________
Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

- George Orwell, 1984
Reply With Quote
  #260 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,204

United_States     California

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
I will repeat myself again: additional jobs will make prices go up because the businesses will have to pay out more money to the employees. The "work or get nothing" policy would not work in this country. We would be in the same situation with lack of jobs and then it would get progressively worse from there on out. For everyone.

I don't know where you are getting I am in denial. I'm being very logical.
Wait, what.....additional jobs are bad for the economy because they make prices go up???? WHAT?!?!?!?!? Are you being serious?

Additional jobs are created by increased economic activity. I will lay this out step by step for you so you can understand.

1.) Cut welfare programs.
2.) Because the government is no longer supporting millions of dead beats they have extra revenue.
3.) Cut taxes.
4.) The individual tax payer now has to pay less in taxes due to the cuts.
5.) The individual consumer with more money on his check can spend more.
6.) Since each consumer has more to spend each buisness now has more customers.
7.) Since the buisness has more customers they have to hire more employees to assist. (Note they don't have to raise prices, increased sales pays for the new employees).
8.) With buisnesses adding new jobs, there are plenty of opportunity for former welfare recipients to work if they choose.

Those who choose not to educate themselves or employ themselves can do whatever they want since they are no longer living on my dime.
Reply With Quote
  #261 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,470

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
And it will get even worse. You can't tie people's tubes. It's a violation of personal privacy and wellbeing. I never said I wanted to increase welfare programs.
I remember a case in California that involved rape. The judge gave the perps the option of massive jail time, or less jail time plus getting neutered.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #262 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
IronMaiden27's Avatar
IronMaiden27 IronMaiden27 is offline
Secretary of Defense
All Your Base Are Belong to Us

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,472

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Running a business means regulating profit. When more profit comes in, they have reached a new profit goal and they continue to increase that goal. If they need to hire more employees the prices will rise because their profits have hit an all-time high, due to an increase in business. They have to maintain the current profit or layoffs will become imminent. What are you going to do about the people who cannot find a job fast enough because it has become an employer's market and jobs become harder to find and a recession hits? What about real estate? How will they live on a minimum wage salary without extra income to assist them?
__________________
Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

- George Orwell, 1984
Reply With Quote
  #263 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
IronMaiden27's Avatar
IronMaiden27 IronMaiden27 is offline
Secretary of Defense
All Your Base Are Belong to Us

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,472

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by reino View Post
I remember a case in California that involved rape. The judge gave the perps the option of massive jail time, or less jail time plus getting neutered.
heh heh well, in that case, castration is deserved
__________________
Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

- George Orwell, 1984
Reply With Quote
  #264 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Mrs. M's Avatar
Mrs. M Mrs. M is offline
Parrothead
What if the hokey-pokey is all it really is about?

 
Member Since: Aug 2004
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 20,991

United_States     Louisiana

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
I agree that welfare does need to be revamped. I have the guts to revamp the system, but unfortunately, I don't have the money or degrees for it. Maybe the government needs to reform their campaigning and make it easier for middle-class citizens run. That way, you wouldn't have such rich, ignorant leaders making the wrong decisions. Don't forget that these people live in the ghettos and poor sections - they have grown into their way of life and find it is acceptable and it is the only way they know HOW to live. You wouldn't see these people in rich neighborhoods because the rich want nothing to do with them. They are considered a "nuissance". Maybe if we tried a little more positive influence and started trying to clean up some of these ghettos, people would have more incentive and confidence to educate themselves. If we look at them negatively, then they will continue to stay negative. Their needs to be neighborhood reform and education before we can even try to manipulte welfare and make it less a burden for us who pay for it.

I'm sure not all of those evacuees were poor. That is a generalized assumption on your part. Who knows what they are? Who do you personally know that did all these things with the FEMA funds?
You can go into the ghettos and make them nice and pretty and nothing will change. It's been tried before in New Orleans and it failed. We have to put limits on the duration of welfare and how much a person can receive before anything will force most recipients off of it.

Of course not all evacuees were poor! My daughter was one of them but she used her money to start rebuilding her home instead of buying a luxury vehicle. Yet, I personally know quite a few that abused the money. One neighbor spent a month traveling in Florida while another bought a 2005 Navigator! Others I know were a little less frivolous, buying big screen t.v.s and such. There were many accounts of abuse on the local news and many accounts of people bitching that the government isn't rebuilding their homes. The pisser of that is that due to a clerical error, I had no insurance and yet received just enough from FEMA to cover the cost of my new roof. The rest of the money I need is in the form of an SBA loan which I will have to pay back. But those that lived in the projects in New Orleans are still living in other cities on FEMA money while waiting for their homes to be rebuilt for them. Is that fair? Hell no! I've worked hard for what I have and I'm thankful that I could get an SBA loan, but why should I have to pay back something that so many others are getting for free? I'll tell you why. It's because I'm not a welfare recipient and therefore am expected to pay my own way and theirs!
Fine, you folks that want to keep the welfare system, go ahead, but realize that you're just putting a bandaid over a festering sore without treating it first. I wonder how many of you that support the system would do so if your payments were voluntary. I doubt too many would.
Reply With Quote
  #265 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,204

United_States     California

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
Running a business means regulating profit. When more profit comes in, they have reached a new profit goal and they continue to increase that goal. If they need to hire more employees the prices will rise because their profits have hit an all-time high, due to an increase in business? What are you going to do about the people who cannot find a job fast enough because it has become an employer's market and jobs become harder to find and a recession hits? What about real estate? How will they live on a minimum wage salary without extra income to assist them?
Hahaha, I do have to admitt, your posts always give me a good chuckle.

Quote:
If they need to hire more employees the prices will rise because their profits have hit an all-time high, due to an increase in business?
I don't even know what that sentence is supposed to mean. Reading your posts I get the sense that you don't really understand the topic but like to throw out ideas like you do understand. There is not logical connection between any of your points in your post.

First off
I don't see how having all time profits causes a rise in prices. Typically if a company can afford to cut prices they will out of fear of losing market share to its compitition.

Second
An increase in hiring activity on the part of buisness does not make for an employers market, it makes for a workers market since workers are more in demand.

Third
Quote:
What about real estate? How will they live on a minimum wage salary without extra income to assist them
I thought you just said that employers are raising prices to pay employees more, so why are all these random employees working for minimum wage? The answer is that your incorrect in your assessment. But thats ok, hopefully you'll be able to learn a little economics from our discussions. I'm happy to help.
Reply With Quote
  #266 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
IronMaiden27's Avatar
IronMaiden27 IronMaiden27 is offline
Secretary of Defense
All Your Base Are Belong to Us

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Mass
Posts: 2,472

United_States    
Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

I said that employers would have to raise prices, to regulate profit, when hiring MORE employees. Not paying employees more.
__________________
Power is not a means, it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power.

- George Orwell, 1984
Reply With Quote
  #267 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,204

United_States     California

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
I said that employers would have to raise prices, to regulate profit, when hiring MORE employees. Not paying employees more.
Why would they raise prices if they are enjoying increased sales? They don't need to raise prices to pay for those employees.

What the hell is regulating profit? Did you just make that up on your own?
Reply With Quote
  #268 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
SamInTheSouth's Avatar
SamInTheSouth SamInTheSouth is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Sep 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 2,705

South_Carolina     United_States

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
Running a business means regulating profit. When more profit comes in, they have reached a new profit goal and they continue to increase that goal. If they need to hire more employees the prices will rise because their profits have hit an all-time high, due to an increase in business. They have to maintain the current profit or layoffs will become imminent.
No. This is not how it works. I don't know from who or what sources you are getting your "knowledge" from, but you need to abandon it. I can assure you, the real world does not work this way. What you wrote doesn't even make logical sense.
__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

President George W. Bush, 8-5-2004

Carolina Politics Online

THIS IS REAL HOPE AND CHANGE!
Reply With Quote
  #269 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
Robert's Avatar
Robert Robert is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,204

United_States     California

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

I don't think you are going to get through to her, she seems to have the kind of economic knowledge you can only gain after a few hits on the bong.
Reply With Quote
  #270 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2007
jpsartre12's Avatar
jpsartre12 jpsartre12 is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jul 2004
Location: On the Right of most issues
Posts: 5,633

United_States     Michigan

Re: Democrats cut Billions in Pork

Quote:
Originally Posted by IronMaiden27 View Post
And it will get even worse. You can't tie people's tubes. It's a violation of personal privacy and wellbeing. I never said I wanted to increase welfare programs.
I'm not suggesting that they should be forced to have their tubes tied. They would only have to do so if they want OUR money. As for violations, how does theft fit into your scenario. If I'm forced to pay for a deadbeat that decides to have a half dozen kids, isn't that theft? Where's my right to keep my personal property fit into your right to personal privacy and well-being?
__________________
843rd Bomb Wing - Strategic Air Command
"Peace is our Profession"

"Human law must rest its authority ultimately upon the authority of that law which is Divine. . . . Far from being rivals or enemies, religion and law are twin sisters, friends, and mutual assistants.
" - James Wilson, U. S. Supreme Court Justice and Signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.uspoliticsonline.com/breaking-news-politics/34373-democrats-cut-billions-pork.html
Posted By