Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
FDR also put the Japanese in internment camps. Does that mean Bush can do it, too?
You don't think that's next?

We got phone taps, now mail intercepts. What's next? internment camps.

All this leads up to more and more.
Reply With Quote
  #77 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
FDR also put the Japanese in internment camps. Does that mean Bush can do it, too?
I don't think a LEGAL precedent exists that allows this and if it did, I am sure it would be struck down, when challenged…..again, the system has to be allowed to work....IF we were to put Muslims into internment camps I am sure the courts would put paid to this….and frankly, imho, ..it was the greatest single rights violation we ever perpetrated....but then again I was not there…the fears run amok in the country at the time, makes this hard to judge 70 years later…..though with 20-20 hindsight its easy to judge now....back then the fear was real....was it right no, but we cannot judge this rightly from here....
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #78 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
You don't think that's next?

We got phone taps, now mail intercepts. What's next? internment camps.

All this leads up to more and more.
I am sure folks said in 1862 that the suspension of habeas corpus was the end of us all....but we survived and it was rescinded ..I happen to have faith in the gov. and the people to right the boat when it goes to far to one side...but as I said, we were not there and did not live the fears and circumstances that they did….
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #79 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
I am sure folks said in 1862 that the suspension of habeas corpus was the end of us all....but we survived and it was rescinded ..I happen to have faith in the gov. and the people to right the boat when it goes to far to one side...but as I said, we were not there and did not live the fears and circumstances that they did….
And history proves the fear was unjustified. I seems that you've read a history book or two - what's wrong with learning from them?

The internment camps never proved to help America survive but it still is a national embaressment. You say repeat history, correct?
Reply With Quote
  #80 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
I don't think a LEGAL precedent exists that allows this and if it did, I am sure it would be struck down, when challenged…..again, the system has to be allowed to work....IF we were to put Muslims into internment camps I am sure the courts would put paid to this….and frankly, imho, ..it was the greatest single rights violation we ever perpetrated....but then again I was not there…the fears run amok in the country at the time, makes this hard to judge 70 years later…..though with 20-20 hindsight its easy to judge now....back then the fear was real....was it right no, but we cannot judge this rightly from here....
So was what FDR did legal back then? I find it hard to believe that no laws changed since WW2. Furthermore, yes, it is alright to judge cowards who were willing to cede power to the government because they started shitting their pants.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
  #81 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
And history proves the fear was unjustified. I seems that you've read a history book or two - what's wrong with learning from them?

The internment camps never proved to help America survive but it still is a national embaressment. You say repeat history, correct?
Learning from it and living it are 2 different things..if everyone governed themselves by what happened in the past they would have to do so GOOD, BAD or Indifferent,....yes the fear may not have been justified this far away, but they weren't standing far away, they were on top it...tragic as it was….I find it hard to gain say them…..
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #82 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,743

United_States     New_York

Re: Bush wants to read your mail

According to Alexander Hamilton and James Madison in Federalist #51:
Quote:
But the great security against a gradual concentration of the several powers in the same department, consists in giving to those who administer each department the necessary constitutional means and personal motives to resist encroachments of the others. The provision for defense must in this, as in all other cases, be made commensurate to the danger of attack. Ambition must be made to counteract ambition. The interest of the man must be connected with the constitutional rights of the place. It may be a reflection on human nature, that such devices should be necessary to control the abuses of government. But what is government itself, but the greatest of all reflections on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. A dependence on the people is, no doubt, the primary control on the government; but experience has taught mankind the necessity of auxiliary precautions.
(bold mine) So yes they supposed exactly what I said they did.
That all rulers will abuse their subjects at any time the potential reward to them is greater than the consequences.

Our constitution gives no sweeping powers to the executive. Instead it enumerates specific and limited powers for government, lays out broad freedoms for the people, and reserves any powers not specifically granted the government to them.
You obviously wish the reverse was true and there are places in the world where it is so. But I hope it will never be here.
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #83 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
timj219's Avatar
timj219 timj219 is online now
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2006
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 4,743

United_States     New_York

Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
good deal.........and lets see the source and lets see how this plays out, the verdict is not in.....IF they were in fact tapped with out cause they should get damages, absolutely, ....IF not, then there ya go....that’s how the system works....
The verdict IS in. The white house is appealing the verdict. The blanket surveillance with no oversight is, in and of itself, "without cause".
__________________
A nation of slaves is always prepared to applaud the clemency of their master who, in the abuse of absolute power, does not proceed to the utmost extremes of injustice and oppression.
Edward Gibbon
Reply With Quote
  #84 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
Learning from it and living it are 2 different things..if everyone governed themselves by what happened in the past they would have to do so GOOD, BAD or Indifferent,....yes the fear may not have been justified this far away, but they weren't standing far away, they were on top it...tragic as it was….I find it hard to gain say them…..
Read what Timj posted, it was really good. I have no idea what you said there or where you're going with it. It makes no sense and it is a circular argument with you as usual.
Reply With Quote
  #85 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
So was what FDR did legal back then? I find it hard to believe that no laws changed since WW2. Furthermore, yes, it is alright to judge cowards who were willing to cede power to the government because they started shitting their pants.
no it wasn’t in our eyes today..BUT remember we had Japanese subs bombing the west coast, German subs putting ashore sabotage teams.....it was different era and they had to live it....


look guys judging things like this, this far removed makes us all Monday morning QB's...we have learned this much, locking up for instance every Muslim in this country would be counter productive and a violation of civil rights, which to be fair may or may not be a violation of civil rights depending on how fair the US courts would be to them........

lets say in a wild burst of conjecture….Muslims in this country and by that I mean a plethora or majority of mosques were to be found giving support to extremist elements in which bombs stated going off in pizzerias in Buffalo, or Fort Lauderdale, or San Francisco…..and it was prevalent and constant…….20 – 30 instances traced back to Muslims…how much do you think the American people would take before reaching a point of civil exhaustion and IF the gov. proposed putting Muslims in camps what kind of support do you think they would get …if a corollary could be traced to mosques etc. how far do you think we would be from outlawing mosques or gatherings of Muslims? People are herd animals to an extent and guess what?…they would by a huge majority supporting it, good or bad, IF the attacks stopped.

Don’t rail on me, I am just throwing it out there….


Think on that.. Because its scary…..the scare maybe to our eyes right now superficial, but think on it….people all people, are in the end, self interested ..we ALL are…and ..take it from there….
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #86 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
Read what Timj posted, it was really good. I have no idea what you said there or where you're going with it. It makes no sense and it is a circular argument with you as usual.
I think I was clear..what can I say? my nuances slide by you others seem to get them…no offense meant…
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #87 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
Read what Timj posted, it was really good. I have no idea what you said there or where you're going with it. It makes no sense and it is a circular argument with you as usual.
unlike some and I don't mean you or slon, I read EVERY post in which respond.... I am sure we both suffer this.....
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #88 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
nulike some and I don't mean you or slon, I read EVERY post in which respond.... I am sure we both suffer this.....
yeah, I'm all giggles like you. har dee har har har. Whatever.
Reply With Quote
  #89 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Imperator's Avatar
Imperator Imperator is offline
Moderator
Audiatur et altera pars!

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 13,618

United_States    
Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
yeah, I'm all giggles like you. har dee har har har. Whatever.

Well, so much for my trying to build a bridge and be jocular...
__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor
Reply With Quote
  #90 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 14,728

United_States     Russian

Re: Bush wants to read your mail

Quote:
Originally Posted by Imperator View Post
no it wasn’t in our eyes today..BUT remember we had Japanese subs bombing the west coast, German subs putting ashore sabotage teams.....it was different era and they had to live it....


look guys judging things like this, this far removed makes us all Monday morning QB's...we have learned this much, locking up for instance every Muslim in this country would be counter productive and a violation of civil rights, which to be fair may or may not be a violation of civil rights depending on how fair the US courts would be to them........

lets say in a wild burst of conjecture….Muslims in this country and by that I mean a plethora or majority of mosques were to be found giving support to extremist elements in which bombs stated going off in pizzerias in Buffalo, or Fort Lauderdale, or San Francisco…..and it was prevalent and constant…….20 – 30 instances traced back to Muslims…how much do you think the American people would take before reaching a point of civil exhaustion and IF the gov. proposed putting Muslims in camps what kind of support do you think they would get …if a corollary could be traced to mosques etc. how far do you think we would be from outlawing mosques or gatherings of Muslims? People are herd animals to an extent and guess what?…they would by a huge majority supporting it, good or bad, IF the attacks stopped.

Don’t rail on me, I am just throwing it out there….


Think on that.. Because its scary…..the scare maybe to our eyes right now superficial, but think on it….people all people, are in the end, self interested ..we ALL are…and ..take it from there….
Same thing happened when the US sheep fell for the Patriot Act after 9/11. And yes, many are sheep. I condemned the Patriot Act and still do, nonetheless.
__________________
If a neocon whines about big government wealth redistribution, just ask him what he thinks about the portion of that big government that sends aid to Israel.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes