Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Curly Curly is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,827

United_States     Virginia

Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Thought this was interesting.

Gore earns Nobel nomination for global warming work

Quote:
OSLO, Norway (AP) -- Former Vice President Al Gore has been nominated for the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for his wide-reaching efforts to draw the world's attention to the dangers of global warming, a Norwegian lawmaker said Thursday.

"A prerequisite for winning the Nobel Peace Prize is making a difference, and Al Gore has made a difference," Conservative Member of Parliament Boerge Brende, a former minister of environment and then of trade, told The Associated Press.
Nice to see that someone thinks Gore's work has been worthwhile.
__________________
Curly

The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

- Hermann Goering
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Hank's Avatar
Hank Hank is offline
Secretary of State
Bob (No, not like in the water. It's my name.)

 
Member Since: Dec 2004
Location: springhill,Florida.
Posts: 5,905

United_States     Florida

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Yea, really says a lot for the integrity of infra-working systems…
Everything is breaking down. The park census system changed there figures and apologized to the black community on there 183,000 -240,000 -350,000 million man count, exit polls after the al-gore/president Bush ballots for the first time in history began picking democrats at a 35% inaccuracy rate, a voting system used for generations suddenly doesn’t work because democrats keep loosing, marriage licensing for anybody wanting to marry anything, on and on with every freaking thing they touch.
__________________
Only a liberal would know how hard it is to get a nicotine patch to stick to a monkey.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Blaupunkt69's Avatar
Blaupunkt69 Blaupunkt69 is offline
City Mayor

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Kamloops, Canada
Posts: 241

Canada     Switzerland

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank View Post
Yea, really says a lot for the integrity of infra-working systems…
Everything is breaking down. The park census system changed there figures and apologized to the black community on there 183,000 -240,000 -350,000 million man count, exit polls after the al-gore/president Bush ballots for the first time in history began picking democrats at a 35% inaccuracy rate, a voting system used for generations suddenly doesn’t work because democrats keep loosing, marriage licensing for anybody wanting to marry anything, on and on with every freaking thing they touch.
ummmm what?

anyways, good for Gore whether he wins or not
__________________
Canada = Mad Cow Disease
USA = Mad Cowboy Disease
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 3,688

United_States    
Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Gore Totally deserves it.

He's been trying to spread awareness of Global Warming for something like 20 years.... much longer than the public has even known the term.

It's not like he's saving the world, but indeed, he could be one of the most influential figures in an eventual movement that can effectively solve the problem.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
doniston's Avatar
doniston doniston is offline
Permanently Banned
Just getting better HEH HEH

 
Member Since: Oct 2005
Location: southern Cal
Posts: 10,548

United_States     United

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

I guess I am the lone desentor. but I am strongly opposed. He is and has been and will always be an absolute nothing (at least to me)
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Good for Gore, he's done a lot of good work.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by doniston View Post
I guess I am the lone desentor. but I am strongly opposed. He is and has been and will always be an absolute nothing (at least to me)
No, I think Hank agrees with you
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
JohnT JohnT is offline
City Council Member

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 179

   
Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

What does Global Warming have to do with Peace?

The Nobel Peace Prize 1901-2000

Quote:
The prize for peace was to be awarded to the person who "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding of peace congresses." The prize was to be awarded "by a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Storting."
Quote:
Thus, some lines of development can be distinguished in the almost 100 year history of the Nobel Peace Prize. First, although the Norwegian Nobel Committee never formally defined "peace," in practice it came to interpret the term ever more broadly. This approach could have its pitfalls, but avoided the danger of locking the committee into fixed categories and gave the committee flexibility to adapt to new concerns. In the early years, the emphasis was definitely on the organized peace movement and the codification of international law, but even in the very first year of the Peace Prize the first humanitarian, and five years later, the first statesman were selected. Later the balance shifted away from the organized peace movement and international jurists, although some of them continued to be selected and the category came to include church leaders and even a Holocaust interpreter. Humanitarians became more numerous, and this category came to include scientists who worked to alleviate hunger. Disarmers became more numerous too, and this category came to include those who supported limited arms control and not necessarily full disarmament. Different kinds of statesmen were awarded the Peace Prize, some for addressing global concerns, others for helping to solve regional crises, still others for the general principles they espoused. The human rights category was added to the list and gradually became perhaps the most numerous one.
The prize has historically been about ending conflict. Now we're going to lump in "global warming activism" as a peaceful endeavor? Does this mean that we can create some new cliches: "Global warming advocates don't declare war on each other, YYYYEEEEEAAAARRRRRGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!"

This is about as lame as the redefining of the "doomsday clock" to include global warming.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Curly Curly is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,827

United_States     Virginia

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
What does Global Warming have to do with Peace?

The Nobel Peace Prize 1901-2000
The quote you included in your post had this:

Quote:
Different kinds of statesmen were awarded the Peace Prize, some for addressing global concerns, others for helping to solve regional crises, still others for the general principles they espoused.
Global concerns? Global warming? I'm guessing here that perhaps the people who nominated Gore believe that global warming is a global concern.

The quote also included this:

Quote:
... although the Norwegian Nobel Committee never formally defined "peace," in practice it came to interpret the term ever more broadly. This approach could have its pitfalls, but avoided the danger of locking the committee into fixed categories and gave the committee flexibility to adapt to new concerns.
__________________
Curly

The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

- Hermann Goering
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
JohnT JohnT is offline
City Council Member

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 179

   
Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

OK, you've matched the word "Global". Now let's try working on the argument about how "warming" correlates with "peace".

I mean, one would think he'd be nominated for one of the... you know... science prizes.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Curly Curly is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: May 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,827

United_States     Virginia

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
OK, you've matched the word "Global". Now let's try working on the argument about how "warming" correlates with "peace".
Well, no, actually what I did was read the information about the Nobel Peace Prize that you posted - you know, the parts about "global concerns" and "new concerns"?

The quote also included (and I also included in my earlier response):

Quote:
... although the Norwegian Nobel Committee never formally defined "peace," in practice it came to interpret the term ever more broadly.
Since they never defined "peace", and since they have interpreted "peace" ever more broadly, it doesn't seem to me that I or anyone else needs to be working on the argument about how "warming" correlates with "peace".

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnT View Post
I mean, one would think he'd be nominated for one of the... you know... science prizes.
Good point. I have nothing to do with how people are nominated for what awards, but perhaps the thinking was that, since Gore didn't work in or develop anything in the sciences, but rather, has been instrumental in spreading the word about global warming, that a strictly science type of award would not be appropriate. But that's just a guess.
__________________
Curly

The people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.

- Hermann Goering
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
JohnT JohnT is offline
City Council Member

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 179

   
Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

But their definition of "peace" has never strayed away from the issue of "non-violence". All the categorical subdivisions within the article deal with non-violence, none deal with "public relations":

Organized Peace Movements
Statesmen
Humanitarians
Disarmerers
Human Rights

Not that it matters, we're just yapping 'cause we like to yap, and this is merely a nomination, not an award. However, if they're going to include non-peace oriented issues in the "Peace Prize" from now on, perhaps the thing ought to be renamed.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 3,688

United_States    
Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Well, if Bono can be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, why is it a stretch for Al Gore?

Bono could arguably be brining the world together with his music, political activism, discussion with world leaders and humanitarian activities.

Al Gore could arguably be uniting nations to work together on a common global initiative... nations that would not otherwise cooperate. Gore has given presentations all over the world. Although he is not a scientist, he is essentially the world embassador of the Global Warming cause.

Perhaps that's why he's being given consideration for the Peace Prize. I think he deserves it.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Ironman Jack Ironman Jack is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 550

United_States     Missouri

Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
Gore Totally deserves it.

He's been trying to spread awareness of Global Warming for something like 20 years.... much longer than the public has even known the term.

It's not like he's saving the world, but indeed, he could be one of the most influential figures in an eventual movement that can effectively solve the problem.
Actually he is trying to spread STREISANDS LEGS, as they wail out Kum By Ya at El Nino!

He sucks big time, he is a Traitor like Clinton, and he is a total fucking idiot! His Home State HATES HIM, EXPLAIN THAT??


How does Global Warming Warnings effect World Peace??

If Gore belongs to this Forum, I am probably banned!!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 02-01-2007
Ironman Jack Ironman Jack is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Missouri
Posts: 550

United_States     Missouri

Question Re: Gore nominated for Nobel Peace Prize

Quote:
Originally Posted by doniston View Post
I guess I am the lone desentor. but I am strongly opposed. He is and has been and will always be an absolute nothing (at least to me)

WE AGREE!! How did this happen??
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online