Texas man gets death penalty for killing fetus - Page 3 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum

Traveler · #31 (**permalink**) 02-11-2007

See because you don't know how to quote Doniston it now looks like you have advocated beating this woman to death rather Steveox from other people quoting you and him.

steveox · #32 (**permalink**) 02-11-2007

The only way to make people to obey the laws is to beat them over the heads with a billyclub!!! Just repeated violent offenders. Just like back in Colonial America when you break the laws you get serve punishments

This how you make kids behave themselves back in Colonial America

Now thats real Justice!!!Betcha they wont commit anymore crimes!

ReddAlert · #33 (**permalink**) 02-11-2007

^I wish they would bring back the pillory for some offenses. It would be a much better way to stop crime than light prison time. Imagine--a set of these right in the middle of the hood.

hairballxavier · #34 (**permalink**) 02-11-2007

Quote:

Quick definitions (person)

noun: a human being

http://www.onelook.com/?w=person&ls=a

.

.

.

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

Your link refers to a human being I repeat the following::

Originally Posted by doniston
I beleive The supreme court has denied that an unborn is a person.

"unborn" is an adjective that describes what noun?

A human being (person)?

Or an aardvark?

Or what?

Or are you trying to argue that an unborn human being is not a human being?...

By your logic...

Is a black human being also not a human being...?

Hank · #35 (**permalink**) 02-12-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

This is bad presidence and will likely be overturned. It will certainly end up with the supreme court.

These type of positions aren’t real positions, they don’t work in the real world.
A loving mother with child being assaulted and resulting in the death of her baby but just bruises to her is most certainly a capital offense. If the man who killed her baby was charged with simple misdemeanor assault “as to accommodate a class action lawsuit by a small group of socialist 60’s activists,” you disembody a justice system result of thousands of years of trial and error.

Those who are lost and don’t see for whatever reason, need to slow down and not view what we tell you as an assault on what you believe to be an ideology or political position. We are right here. No arrogance in the declaration and no aggressions in our intend to save you and civilized man.

WWWW#HHHHAAAAAAATTTTT??? what does ANY of that mean????

I don’t know, I was dialoging.

hairballxavier · #36 (**permalink**) 02-12-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hank

I don’t know, I was dialoging.

That is the funniest shit I've ever heard in this forum.

It was a darn good dialoge too Hank. I salute you.

doniston · #37 (**permalink**) 02-12-2007

[quote=Maddox;917926]

Quote:

Originally Posted by steveox

I thought you hated cops? Now you wanna give them the power to beat the crap out of people and deal with people out of court? Doesn't that mean you should have gotten the mother of all bitchslapping ever, when you got that ticket?

Youare right, I do, but if you will check the previous post (28)you will find that it wasn't I who said that but stated by Steveox in response to me. Further, It would appear that the quote I posted of you came out as a quote of Steveox, Strange.---- But this malfunction has appeared several times before, whether or not I was involved. and has previously been reported.

doniston · #38 (**permalink**) 02-12-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Traveler

See because you don't know how to quote Doniston it now looks like you have advocated beating this woman to death rather Steveox from other people quoting you and him.

I know you don't pay critical attention, but check out post 37. Further, While I recognized this as just one more unfounded complain by you. But this part of the statement makes absolutely NO sense regardless of your intent

(quote)
rather Steveox from other people quoting you and him.(unquote)

HUH?????

doniston · #39 (**permalink**) 02-12-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by hairballxavier

person - OneLook Dictionary Search

.

.

.

"unborn" is an adjective that describes what noun?

A human being (person)?

Or an aardvark?

Or what?

these are not even logical questions as unborn meerly describes a state of being.

Quote:

Or are you trying to argue that an unborn human being is not a human being?...

I am arguing nothing, that was a determination of the Supreme court.

Quote:

Is a black human being also not a human being...?

If it is unborn, then according to the court, YES. However, If you had a brain that works, you might realize that the word black is an adjective which could, if applicable take the place of "unborn", as that is also a state of being. as would be short, fat, blind, crippled,etc. If they are also unborn, then the Supreme court has stated that they are not recognized as a human being UNTIL they are born.

Now I'm sure this is not news to you but you are just being argumentive. because this have been cover before several times.

Traveler · #40 (**permalink**) 02-14-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by doniston

I know you don't pay critical attention, but check out post 37. Further, While I recognized this as just one more unfounded complain by you. But this part of the statement makes absolutely NO sense regardless of your intent

Doniston, look at your post, 37 and then look at Hank's post, 35.

Now for homework today do you think you could make your post look like his?

Really, its not a failure of the system, its you!!!!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode