Like they did under Clinton?

There's a difference between planning for the future and saying if the commander in chief, or any of his cabinet, were dead more people would be alive. It's a shame you can't tell the difference.

Varus

Whats the big deal here? Maher has clarifed that he did not mean to say that Cheney should be killed, only that Cheney is causing the deaths of others. Im assuming he thinks it would be a silver lining if Cheney had been killed. Thats not the sam as advocating his death. Im sure hed be just as happy if he wasnt VP. Maher is a shock comedian, whats the surprise. This is the guy who said that the 911 terrorists were brave. What do you expect from someone like that?

__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.

The war ending does not mean people will stop being killed.

__________________
"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

President George W. Bush, 8-5-2004

Carolina Politics Online

THIS IS REAL HOPE AND CHANGE!

Ok, I guess you are not a pre-teen after all. I don't think you are old enough to qualify. (at least judging from the way, and what you post.)

If the administration here wasn't so damned permissive, you would be long gone. I didn't read the Op before it was removed, but if it is true that you advocated shooting Chenny, then it is you who should have been removed rather than just your post.

OK. let's answer this once and for all.

It doesn't make one damned bit of difference whether it is against the law or not. This Forum is the property of MARC. If it is his desire that these types of things are not allowed, THEN THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED. Unfortunately I guess it is also permissible for him to delegate the authority for such decisions to others,

And further, IMHO ( and in spite of my own objections in other matters,) a couple of the Strawbosses in ths forum Seem to take their authority to extremes.

If it is said that the enemy of my friend is my enemy. Them I assume you are one of those ememies, and of course, Since he has done harm to my friends (The citizens of these united States.) Then he is my enemy.

Ref the embolden portion above. the "us" you refer to, certainly does not include the majority of the American Citizens. He has definitely done harm to me, by harming my fellow citizens.

If you want to blame clinton for pre 9/11 safety you have to blame bush for the same. But yes, our border and ports have been porous for years.


What if its the truth?


In a sense I guess you could say that, but in their messed up religious mind there probably is no fear they are so dogmatic.


It will for Americans....not the others.


Is advocating also illegal, or just a threat to do so yourself. There is a difference.

I hope you will be this vigilant when Hillary is President and Ironman, todd93, varus, sumyd and other angry righties start saying that kinda shit about her

I have refrained from saying anything about his referring to you as Nancy, as to my knowlege, your first name "might" have been Nancy, " since you have just made it clear that such is not the case, it should be treated as an intended insult, which is against the rules, (as is using a undesireable reference to a poster)and should be reported.

If it happens again, I will do so.

Relax.

I am not doubting the forum is the property of Marc. I simply said I felt the rule was unfair, that is all. I would have discussed further in this thread, but I felt it was better to create a different one under "suggestions" as Matt suggested. ...

It is also different in that I did not say it was illegal, but that in my opinion it "SHOULD" be a cause for discipline. And I had not read the OP so I used the "IF" word.

You can't post that hey O'bere does SamInTheBurgh get two points for insulting Slon? After all I referred to him as chum! Aw shucks now I've actually broken a rule.

__________________
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the American flag." -- Huey Long, Senator (D-LA)

None of which was caused by President Bush.

Yes, Iraq was a threat, the fact is they not only had WMD's, that's been well proven, but they also had intentions of using them. The facts have also shown thet they have harbored terrorists that threaten our national security. Sorry, but you're points have no truth in them.

No freedoms have been lost here, in fact we're more free now than we would be under Liberals because Liberalism is actually Socialism, you're all a bunch of Marxists, and you know it. You thought Gorbechev was going to save us from Reagan, when in fact, Reagan single handedly won the cold war for us. Get with the program.

__________________
Honor role student at the Limbaugh Institute for advanced Conservative studies.

So, the enemies of the US are your friends? Like Bin Laden and Saddam Hussein? That comes as no surprise to me.

President Bush has in no way shape or form done any harm what so ever to our fellow citizens. Maybe in that mushroom trip you call your pacifist mind, but in reality, without the actions that the President has taken to protect us we would've all been kneeling before the terrorists by now.

__________________
Honor role student at the Limbaugh Institute for advanced Conservative studies.