And still no arguement. Just more ad hominem.

__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.

So anyone who WANTS our destruction is an enemy, but anyone who is actually CAUSING DAMAGE to us is a national hero?So the Iraq invasion and occupation has caused 0 deaths? And since when does invading nations equal "standing up for oneself?" If I go to my neighbor's house because I think he might have WMDs (which he does not), and then kill him, does that mean I am simply standing up for myself?Actually, I was talking about damage to the US. Specifically, the Patriot Act.So invading Iraq, harming our global image, wasting billions of dollars, losing ~3,000 soldiers, passing acts that take away freedoms, etc... is not damage to the US?

__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.

I'm going to clear things up. Here it is on YouTubeYouTube - Bill Maher thinks we should be able to wish Cheney dead

__________________
"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Yea I do why do I give a damn what some Foreigner thinks to begin with as YOUR Country doesn't overwhelm anyone either!

Here in the statwes boy you best respect our leaders, except Liberal-Stalinist pussies, like Ried, Kerry, Kennedy, CLINTON & clinton(Murder Inc.) or any Liberal or Raghead lover!! Help there Jr? Are you one of those Telemarketers I get hold of when my PC don't work?

Please share with us.

This is USPOL and people of all nationalities are entitled to post their opinions. Further, which is "my country"?

Bush is a joker and not meant to be respected.

Your insults are uncalled for. Clinton was one of the BEST presidents the US ever had.

Again, your insults merely show that you have no grounds on which to debate on.

No, Paw ...

Telemarketers help you to fix your PC, paw?

No wonder it doesn't work worth a damn.

Bush is not causing damage to us, get your head out of the sand and pay attention.

I reject the Liberal premise of your statement here. There is always death in war, and that is very sad, however, Bush hasn't caused any of it.

The Patriot Act has been proven to have not done any damage. I wish you could explain to me how tearing down the wall that William the impeached put between intelligence agencies is doing damage to the US. It's not, theres no possible way it can. You Libs have done nothing but lie about the program, I mean how on earth do you actually believe this stuff that you are saying. Do you ever stop and just listen to the true lunacy that comes out of your mouth when you say that the Patriot Act is doing damage? You can't name one thing the Patriot Act has damaged.

First of all, who cares about our image when our national security is at stake? Second, wars cost money, no doubt, third, you can't even factor the casualties into the equation due to the fact that they are at a minimum for an operation of this size that we are winning, and fourth, you can show no proof that the Patriot Act, or anything else the President has implemented has taken away any of our freedoms. Sorry, junior, you're done.

__________________
Honor role student at the Limbaugh Institute for advanced Conservative studies.

Sure, he isn't solely to blame, but he is the one in charge.


Neither of these are true as much as you may wish so.


Yes, I am a socialist in some ways. How do you think we are more free under conservatism if conservatism means more restrictions on freedoms? I'd like to see you explain that one. Explain the patriot act.


I'm tired of hearing this. What exactly did he do? Jump in his voltron robot or shoot lasers from his eyes? The USSR imploded. We didnt do shit. The whole 'cold war' was just like 'the war on terror'. Just some shit made up to allow the republicans to go play army around the globe.


Respect isn't automatic, it should be earned.


Oh please. He enstated nafta, passed don't ask don't tell, bombed foreign countries to try to get the mind off his scandals, and possibly even committed perjury about them.


ROFL, bush and bush alone started this war..he caused it all. This was a war of choice, not defense.


The constitution.

It is a direct violation by allowing imprisonment indefinitely without trial or charges and allows unconstitutional searches and violations of privacy for our citizens without criminal cause.


How about actually working on our security? Defend the homeland by securing ports and borders. Lashing out defiantly against a country that did nothing to us solves nothing.

No, it was Democrats that demanded the resolution to enter the war on terror, and your hero, Bill Clinton, was saying the same things in 1998 that were being said in 2002-2003.

Yes, they have both been proven by eye witness accounts that Saddam moved his WMD's to Syria shortly before we put him in his place, and he also had intentions of doing harm to the US.

First of all, allow me to explain to you the difference in Liberalism and Conservatism. Liberals are Socialists. They don't believe in in Americans being free to do anything, they believe that we need them to get by, they want to rule and dictate every aspect of our lives. Conservatives believe in Government getting out of our way and allowing us to do the best we can. Liberals want to make everyone poor because they need victims, Conservatives believe that everyone should make as much money as they possibly can.

The Patriot Act? You can't explain the patriot act because your vision is clouded by the Liberal lies that it robs our civil Liberties. Since September 11th, federal terrorism investigations have resulted in charges against more than 400 suspects, and more than half those charged have been convicted. Federal, state, and local law enforcement have used the Patriot Act to break up terror cells in New York and Oregon and Virginia and in Florida. We've prosecuted terrorist operatives and supporters in California, in Texas, and New Jersey, and Illinois, and North Carolina, and Ohio. These efforts have not always made the headlines but they've made communities safer. The Patriot Act has accomplished exactly what it was designed to do. It tears down the wall between intelligence agencies and allows them to share vital security information. I know, you Liberals want us to just sit here and die, I refuse to do that.

Typical Liberal, tired of hearing the truth, you wanna know what Ronaldous Magnus did to end the cold war? He didn't back down from your buddies in the USSR. He forced them to put their nation into poverty trying to build up their armies which could never have even competed with the US no matter what they did causing economical implosion of their Government. If you're tired of hearing the truth, then maybe you should just stay with the move on dot org crowd and listen to the lies that they tell everyone.


No, this war was started by those who want to see us dead, you might want the people of the world that hate us to succeed, but I don't.

Since when do our enemies have Constitutional rights, the only rights they have is to either surrender, or die.

Because enemies, not citizens, have been jailed for checking out many bomb making books, and stuff like that it takes away our rights? I sort of agree, those people should have been drug out into the street and shot, instead of mooching off of us. Let me guess, that's offensive, right? What do you think our founders would've done?

I agree, our borders need to be secured, and we have not lashed out against any countries that have "done nothing to us" Have we attacked France or Britain? (I know if we were to attack France, it would be even shorter than Saddam's defeat) Do you realize that the terrorists see the weaknesses of places like France and Germany, and when they get opportunities, they will destroy many people there because of it. If Bill Clinton would've done his job, 9/11 probably wouldn't have even happened, that is an irrefutable fact.

__________________
Honor role student at the Limbaugh Institute for advanced Conservative studies.

This post made about as much sense as absolutely nothing. The first sentence wasn't even understandable.

Your post is so full of garbage and plain unadulterated Crap that it isn't worth attempting to correct.

HAHA, shows how much you know about me. I hated Bill Clinton. He was one of the worst conservative presidents of the last century.


Funny as I haven't heard reports of these, even from the raving conservative talk show hosts.


Both liberals and conservatives advocate more or less government, just different areas.

Liberals want LESS social regulations and MORE economic regulations.
Conservatives want MORE social regulations and LESS economic regulations.


Iraq never so much as shot a spitwad at America.


The act doesn't hurt our enemies you buffoon, it hurts every American citizen.


So reading a book is now a criminal offense? Do you also advocate burning all of the books and shooting the authors?

So ~3000 dead soldiers, billions of dollars lost and freedoms taken away is not damage? Than I guess bin Laden is a friend/helper?So you admit that there were deaths? But since there were deaths in other wars, that means they aren't caused by anyone? That makes no sense. So Bush started the war, 3000 US soldiers died in it, but it wasn't his fault, right? He didn't know there would be any casualties?Really? Where was this proof? I don't see any here.Here is one example:

USA PATRIOT Act, Title II - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I just did. Maybe you should try less ad hominem and more common sense.This implies that "national security" is at stake because of Iraq and that invading Iraq somehow helped our national security, despite the fact that terrorism has increased due to the Iraq war.So can you send me a few billion dollars and ~3000 slaves? I'll promise I won't increase terrorism with them, which is already better than what Bush has done.I already did show proof.

__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.

Did not say you didn't have a right boy, its the fact I don't give a damn what Foreigners think is what I feel is important!

No they don't help because they talk like they have mouth full of......get my drift!

I assume your from India the way you BOW TO ME!!

Clinton was our worst Jr, he was a bottom feeding Traitor, a Sexual Deviate and Criminal! He MURDERED about 150 people at Waco and was responsible for 9/11, despite what Liberals tell you!! Thanks for playing and do try again after more practice!!

It's called freedom of opinion maybe your suggesting nationalized lobotomy?

__________________
"When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the American flag." -- Huey Long, Senator (D-LA)