Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007
Angry American's Avatar
Angry American Angry American is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 1,586

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Isn't this up to the Afghan government, and not Blair?
True, but as England moves to decriminalize drugs, an open poppy market would give Afghanistan an opening to legitimize its cash crop.
__________________
"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

"An honest man can feel no pleasure in the exercise of power over his fellow citizens."


-Thomas Jefferson

Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Does anyone know the market value of morphine as a legitimate commodity versus morphine refined into illegal heroin?
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007
Slon Slon is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 13,877

United_States     Russian

Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Anyone remember what happened during Prohibition? Do retards in America ever learn? Yes, I'm talking to you, majority of America.
__________________
A federal judge ruled today that graphic pictures of detainee abuse at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison must be released over government claims that they could damage America's image.

Someone should tell them that bad press can be prevented by not abusing prisoners in the first place. Censorship is only needed to preserve the good reputation of those who have tortured and/or murdered already.
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slon View Post
Anyone remember what happened during Prohibition? Do retards in America ever learn? Yes, I'm talking to you, majority of America.
Maybe the US needs to get some prominent citizens involved in drug cartels as were involved in prohibition so they can see the wisdom of legalization with vastly reduced LE costs, windfall tax revenue and ROI from government approved entertainment drug firms they implement with total US production/distribution rights.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 04-04-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 3,688

United_States    
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Isn't this up to the Afghan government, and not Blair?
The Afghan government is already on board with it as long as someone else takes the responsibility for the licensing. (translation: "I have no problem with it, but I'm not going to paint a bullseye on my ass")

From Article:
Quote:
The Afghan President, Hamid Karzai, who has opposed the idea in the past, is said privately to have changed his mind - as long as the international community takes on any licensing scheme.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
Fozmonster Fozmonster is offline
Speaker of the House

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 994

Scotland     Scotland

Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

I've got to say I'm amazed by the support this idea has had on this forum (for a liberal suggestion) - could we really all be agreed on this as a way forward?

If a broad spectrum of society supports it, then why are the politicians scared to do it?
__________________
'They'd rather be alive than free, I guess. Poor dumb bastards.' Private Eightball - Full Metal Jacket

The art of war is of vital importance to the State. It is a matter of life and death, a road either to safety or to ruin. Hence it is a subject of inquiry which can on no account be neglected
- Sun Tzu, the Art of War
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
conformfailure conformfailure is offline
Temporarily Banned

 
Member Since: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,291

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

This drug is no friend to humanity.

It's amazing how the Taliban attempted to eradicate the drug and now that the U.S/U.K. is in there, the opium business has blossomed.

Anyone that can't connect the dots is probably an idiot. Nothing like the U.S. of A involved in producing and trafficking drugs.

Expect a drug epidemic in America in less than 5 years. Expect it to be worse than it already is in China.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
gem gem is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: Closer to the mountaintop.
Posts: 3,073

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
This drug is no friend to humanity.

It's amazing how the Taliban attempted to eradicate the drug and now that the U.S/U.K. is in there, the opium business has blossomed.

Anyone that can't connect the dots is probably an idiot. Nothing like the U.S. of A involved in producing and trafficking drugs.

Expect a drug epidemic in America in less than 5 years. Expect it to be worse than it already is in China.
In the sense that you're looking at it I would agree, CF. But ironically it also is, especially in the realm of medicine, very much a friend of humanity- more so than alcohol, and even that has benefits for humanity. I don't believe we're going to have any more of a drug epidemic if it is legalized than we do now. That was one of the fears of the prohibitionists concerning the repeal of the 18th Amendment, a fear that never materialized when Prohibition was repealed. Since we're going to have addicts whether the drug is legally available or not I would propose legalizing it and making it reasonably and affordably available through a pharmacist. That would at least alleviate the problems of the associated crimes commited by addicts and those looking for quick sources of astronomical sums of cash, and probably result in a reduction of overdose deaths as well.
And it would rip the financial underpinnings of organizations like Al Qeada, the Taliban and the world-wide drug cartels right out from underneath them.

Seems to me legalizing the stuff would kill a multitude of birds with one stone, if you'll excuse the pun.

Gem
__________________
There is no political solution to our troubled evolution.

"Reality, the left-wing liberal conspiracy. "
Credited to Angry American.

Last edited by gem; 04-05-2007 at 05:29 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
enigma2's Avatar
enigma2 enigma2 is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,108

Australia    
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirMoby View Post
It will never be allowed. Way too much money is coming from the illegal poppy industry and only a fraction is going to fund terrorism. The rest is going to fund those fighting terrorism and they won't allow the drop in income.
Very true, Sir. The poppy industry is run mainly for the benefit of the CIA secret budget. This is why they hated the elected government of Afghanistan back in the 80's. That government was paying the farmers not to grow poppies and was trying to move the crop into other profitable areas.

The true story of the invasion of Afghanistan is not as simple as the 'Bushies' would have us believe.
__________________
Lucky is he (sic) who has been able to understand the causes of things
Virgil
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
enigma2's Avatar
enigma2 enigma2 is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,108

Australia    
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThorHammer View Post
Isn't this up to the Afghan government, and not Blair?
Thorhammer, I think you are on to something here. Of course it would be up to an elected Afghan government, however, as there is no such animal, the 'imperialists' are promulgating laws which suit themselves.

It was ever thus.
__________________
Lucky is he (sic) who has been able to understand the causes of things
Virgil
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 3,688

United_States    
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
This drug is no friend to humanity.

It's amazing how the Taliban attempted to eradicate the drug and now that the U.S/U.K. is in there, the opium business has blossomed.

Anyone that can't connect the dots is probably an idiot. Nothing like the U.S. of A involved in producing and trafficking drugs.

Expect a drug epidemic in America in less than 5 years. Expect it to be worse than it already is in China.
It's a myth that the Taliban tried to eradicate Opium production while they were in power. What happened is that they curbed production for a couple of years to drive the price up. They had huge surplusses in storage and so they created a false shortage so that it would be more profitable.

The Taliban still makes money off the drug trade.

If poppy production were legalized and regulated, the Taliban would lose a vital part of their funding.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by conformfailure View Post
Expect a drug epidemic in America in less than 5 years. Expect it to be worse than it already is in China.
You must be somewhat sheltered as meth, not heroin, is now the street drug of choice and any cop will tell you it has already reached epidemic proportions. Far less expensive than heroin will ever be, longer lasting high and physically far more destructive than heroin.
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
It's a myth that the Taliban tried to eradicate Opium production while they were in power. What happened is that they curbed production for a couple of years to drive the price up. They had huge surplusses in storage and so they created a false shortage so that it would be more profitable.

The Taliban still makes money off the drug trade.

If poppy production were legalized and regulated, the Taliban would lose a vital part of their funding.
You're missing an important piece of the management chain. Afghanistan tribal and clan leadership derive the majority of profits from poppy production. Taliban received a 'tax' on those proceeds until a couple of years before the US invasion and were convinced to formally outlaw poppy production by the US DEA by more money than the taxes were earning right up to the invasion while poppy production continued. In spite of US propaganda, Afghanistan is absolutely controlled by tribal leaders, many of whom also serve in the puppet government.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
TheLastBoyScout's Avatar
TheLastBoyScout TheLastBoyScout is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Jan 2007
Location: U.S.A
Posts: 3,688

United_States    
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by Americano View Post
You're missing an important piece of the management chain. Afghanistan tribal and clan leadership derive the majority of profits from poppy production. Taliban received a 'tax' on those proceeds until a couple of years before the US invasion and were convinced to formally outlaw poppy production by the US DEA by more money than the taxes were earning right up to the invasion while poppy production continued. In spite of US propaganda, Afghanistan is absolutely controlled by tribal leaders, many of whom also serve in the puppet government.
The tribal leaders still profit off the poppies today, but the drugs (as they always have) make their way into the world largely via Pakistan where the Taliban are now operating.

The Taliban still make money by enforcing "laws" in the lawless region of Pakistan. The drugs get trafficked right through the area that the Taliban control. The Traffickers work in concert with and fund the Taliban to a large extent.

Legalization would dramatically cut the amount of poppy that gets smuggled out through Pakistan. That can only be a good thing.
__________________


Screw Change!! Let's have a Seamless Transition of Power and Policy.. John McSame in 2008!
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2007
Americano Americano is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 5,661

   
Re: Blair considers Legalizing Poppy in Afghanistan

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheLastBoyScout View Post
The tribal leaders still profit off the poppies today, but the drugs (as they always have) make their way into the world largely via Pakistan where the Taliban are now operating.

The Taliban still make money by enforcing "laws" in the lawless region of Pakistan. The drugs get trafficked right through the area that the Taliban control. The Traffickers work in concert with and fund the Taliban to a large extent.

Legalization would dramatically cut the amount of poppy that gets smuggled out through Pakistan. That can only be a good thing.
Viability depends on market value of legal exports (I have no idea), will they generate as much revenue as illegal production. Resistance to US occupation will tax those proceeds in one form or another and, if illegal exports are more profitable, tribal chieftains will play both the legal and illegal sides of the street.

Here's a US state department paper opposing legalization:

U.S. Opposes Efforts to Legalize Opium in Afghanistan: The Rationale Against Legalization

One of their talking points is legal poppy exportation having far less value than illegal exports. The paper claims legal morphine is in adequate supply and stockpiled, but contradicts itself by blaming unavailability in undeveloped countries on this and that. Typical anti-drug message tied in with expressed democratic principles from an administration in bed with the pharmaceutical industry.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online