Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,131

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Youre severly misinformed. We have had a constant benchmark system that we will leave when Iraq is able to take care of its own security. Furthermore, Bush is accountable to the people, not congress. And the people relected him, so he can do what he wants till his term is over. Finally, all congress has to do is not pass a funding bill. Then the troops come home. But, the constitution puts the President in charge of military operations. Congress shut up about strategy.
Do you really think Bush will bring the troops home if they don't have funding? This is a president who considers plastic bags armor and cardboard edible substance.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Do you realize that the Bush administration promised that the war would only cost us about one and a half billion dollars and the Iraqi oil would pay for the whole thing? That's what they told us. That was just another lie. The cost could top TWO TRILLION DOLLARS if it goes on till 2010.

Bush even fired the guy who said the war would cost 100 billion dollars. If only he was right!

Quote:
....All this despite Paul Wolfowitz's promise that the war would be over quickly, the troops home soon, and that the reconstruction would be self-funding, thanks to the sale of Iraqi oil supplies. Back in 2003 the President's economic advisor, Larry Lindsay, predicted that the Iraq adventure would cost more than $100 billion. He was fired, in part, for saying it, yet he greatly underestimated the cost.....
"Six Questions for Gordon Adams on the Real Cost of the “War on Terror”" by Ken Silverstein (Harper's Magazine)

Quote:
"Even taking a conservative approach, we have been surprised at how large they are," the study said, referring to total war costs. "We can state, with some degree of confidence, that they exceed a trillion dollars."

The higher $2 trillion amount takes a 'moderate' approach. Both figures are based on the projection that US troops will remain in Iraq until 2010, with steadily decreasing numbers each year. The economists also used government data from past wars, and included such costs as the rise in the price of oil, a larger US deficit and greater global insecurity caused by the war, the loss to the economy from injured veterans who cannot contribute as productively as they would have done if not injured, and the increased costs of recruiting to replenish a military drained by repeated tours of duty in Iraq. These are items which are almost never included by the US government when determining the cost of the war.
Report: Iraq war costs could top $2 trillion | csmonitor.com

Traveler here says we should just hand over the tax dollars, no questions asked. After being lied to, do you hand the liar all your money Traveler? This is another 400 billion dollars we are talking about, for a war Bush said would cost a little over one billion, and fired the guy who said it would cost 100 billion.

Why do you believe these liars?

Everything about this war has been a lie. It's time to end it. Enough is enough. It's breaking the back of our military and putting our country in massive debt.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Fidei Defensor's Avatar
Fidei Defensor Fidei Defensor is offline
Secretary of Defense
Advocatus Diaboli

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: in partibus infidelium
Posts: 2,778

United_States     Vatican

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakkasan View Post
I think both sides need to stop fucking around

and support the damn troops
If they can coerce the Iraqi leaders to take real, effective action that would actually be pretty damn supportive of the troops, I think. Now, I don't know if that's their aim here or just to drop in a "poison pill" as has been suggested elsewhere.
__________________
http://www.ecatholicchurches.com/eccuniversal/eccbanners/st_peters_square_1.jpg
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
wrxsti wrxsti is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,114

   
Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

I wonder if Bush could secretely start selling off US assests to pay for a continuation of the war into the future. I'm sure oil companies would be interested in ANWAR, we could sell the National Parks, etc. Arms sales ala Iran-Contra is also a possibility. This would remove congress from the funding equation.

It is rediculus to attach timelines or performance measurements to war funding. I suspect we will need to remain in Iraq for years to come, we cannot allow funding to be an impediment to our noble cause.
Reply With Quote
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Danny's Avatar
Danny Danny is offline
Back on track

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,156

Canada     United_States

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Thank you very much. There really isn't anything else to add to that. It's all been said already.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
Brilliant!!!
Reply With Quote
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Traveler Traveler is offline
Dejected Republican
THE Ultimate Bush Supporter

 
Member Since: Feb 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 13,653

United_States     Texas

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Yeah but at least ib this instance it has at least got some relevance to the topic; better than it being about say someone stubbing their toe and it being the fault of Bush or say you got a little drunk, got hungover and then blamed that on Bush. Of course you all on the left already know that is indeed his fault how the war in Iraq is to blame for your pet dog being run over but do at least humor us "non-intellects" from time to time eh?
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
manuelmpf manuelmpf is offline
Secretary of Defense

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain, CA
Posts: 3,392

California     Portugal

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Democrats in Congress have proposed another war funding bill with a "poison pill" - a measure sure to provoke a Presidential veto. This one contains language threatening to cut off funding if the Iraqi government fails to meet Congress-specified goals and benchmarks.

Unlike a previous funding-and-surrender bill that was quickly vetoed, this bill does not violate the Constitution. Though Congress has no power to dictate the disposition or withdrawl of the armed forces, they do have Constitutional authority to allocate (or refuse to allocate) funds in the way this new bill describes. And, of course, the President has Constitutional authority to veto bills that would disrupt or destroy progress of programs the United States is engaged in. Clearly, this is one such.

President Bush has stated he would veto the new bill if it reached his desk in its present form.

White House issues veto threat on new Iraq funding bill - CNN.com
Wow, what bastards the Congress. How dare they demand tangible benchmarks of success. What an awful thing to do to poor George.
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Danny's Avatar
Danny Danny is offline
Back on track

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,156

Canada     United_States

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsti View Post
I wonder if Bush could secretely start selling off US assests to pay for a continuation of the war into the future. I'm sure oil companies would be interested in ANWAR, we could sell the National Parks, etc. Arms sales ala Iran-Contra is also a possibility. This would remove congress from the funding equation.

It is rediculus to attach timelines or performance measurements to war funding. I suspect we will need to remain in Iraq for years to come, we cannot allow funding to be an impediment to our noble cause.
The premise is noble but so would attacking China. Would you support such an endeavor to free the non-free Chinese population from their oppressive government? Of course not. The amount of violence that would ensue would not be worth it for the Chinese.

There are noble causes in this world that have to come to be realized on their own. Iraq was one of them.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,131

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

I always took Cheney's word for it when he said that we had "turned the corner". I mean he has access to top secret information. Would he mislead America?
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
wrxsti wrxsti is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Blue State
Posts: 1,114

   
Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny View Post
The premise is noble but so would attacking China. Would you support such an endeavor to free the non-free Chinese population from their oppressive government? Of course not. The amount of violence that would ensue would not be worth it for the Chinese.

There are noble causes in this world that have to come to be realized on their own. Iraq was one of them.
At this time, I would agree we cannot take on China. When the war on terror has been won, however, we will most likely need to address the potential Chines threat as well.

I believe you misunderstand the reference to the noble cause - it has nothing to do with the Iraqi (or Chinese) people and thier happiness, and everything to do with protecting the interests of the US and keeping our status as the lone superpower.
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Speakeasy's Avatar
Speakeasy Speakeasy is offline
Moderator
Suddenly. Amazons. Everywhere.

 
Member Since: Apr 2004
Location: Herndon, Virginia
Posts: 17,505

United_States     Virginia

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Threads merged.
__________________
"Anyone that needs what they want, and doesn’t want what they need
I want nothing to do with
And to do what I want
And to do what I please
Is first on my to-do list
"
-Gnarls Barkley, "Going On" lyrics
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,131

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsti View Post
At this time, I would agree we cannot take on China. When the war on terror has been won, however, we will most likely need to address the potential Chines threat as well.

I believe you misunderstand the reference to the noble cause - it has nothing to do with the Iraqi (or Chinese) people and thier happiness, and everything to do with protecting the interests of the US and keeping our status as the lone superpower.
"Chines"? The proper term is celestials.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,975

United_States    
Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
Do you really think Bush will bring the troops home if they don't have funding? This is a president who considers plastic bags armor and cardboard edible substance.
Sarcasm has no use here, and yes, I think that without funding, the troops have to come home.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,975

United_States    
Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
I always took Cheney's word for it when he said that we had "turned the corner". I mean he has access to top secret information. Would he mislead America?
Perhaps we had turned the corner, and then right back when Reid declared the war lost.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 4,131

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Sarcasm has no use here, and yes, I think that without funding, the troops have to come home.
I'm not being sarcastic. Dubya hasn't got a clue about what the needs of the military are.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online