Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,856

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Perhaps we had turned the corner, and then right back when Reid declared the war lost.
So you're saying a few words have a bigger impact on our troops than an entire strategy? That does go in-line with neocon thinking. After all, Dubya has discarded miltary tactics for rhetoric.
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Hail to the king, baby!

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,570

Colorado     United_States

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Perhaps we had turned the corner, and then right back when Reid declared the war lost.
Laughable at best.
__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam
Reply With Quote
  #33 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
varrussword varrussword is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: south
Posts: 3,640

   
Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Perhaps we had turned the corner, and then right back when Reid declared the war lost.
Democrats have been out to sabotauge this war from the beginning. Once you understand this you understand the motives behind Reid publicly saying the war is lost. The Democrats have gone all in on defeat, they can't turn back now.

Varus
Reply With Quote
  #34 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
ViolaLee ViolaLee is offline
County Executive
We are the ones we've been waiting for.

 
Member Since: Feb 2005
Location: California
Posts: 382

United_States     California

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsti View Post
I wonder if Bush could secretely start selling off US assests to pay for a continuation of the war into the future. I'm sure oil companies would be interested in ANWAR, we could sell the National Parks, etc. Arms sales ala Iran-Contra is also a possibility. This would remove congress from the funding equation.

It is rediculus to attach timelines or performance measurements to war funding. I suspect we will need to remain in Iraq for years to come, we cannot allow funding to be an impediment to our noble cause.
You're very funny, in a scary sort of way.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
Yeah but at least ib this instance it has at least got some relevance to the topic; better than it being about say someone stubbing their toe and it being the fault of Bush or say you got a little drunk, got hungover and then blamed that on Bush. Of course you all on the left already know that is indeed his fault how the war in Iraq is to blame for your pet dog being run over but do at least humor us "non-intellects" from time to time eh?
Yeah, like that's been said so many times... Is this a strawman, hyperbole or ad hominem or just plain old bullshit? I get confused with all the different wacky tactics people use to prevent them from having to discuss the actual issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
I always took Cheney's word for it when he said that we had "turned the corner". I mean he has access to top secret information. Would he mislead America?
He misleads liar lovers, he doesn't mislead me!

Quote:
Originally Posted by varrussword View Post
Democrats have been out to sabotauge this war from the beginning. Once you understand this you understand the motives behind Reid publicly saying the war is lost. The Democrats have gone all in on defeat, they can't turn back now.

Varus
That's crap.

Funny though, because you've used the argument that the Democrats voted for the war at the beginning. Did their votes sabotage the war?

I Can't Stand It I Know You Planned It
But I'm Gonna Set It Straight, This Watergate
I Can't Stand Rocking When I'm In Here
Because Your Crystal Ball Ain't So Crystal Clear
So While You Sit Back And Wonder Why
I Got This Fucking Thorn In My Side
Oh My God, It's A Mirage
I'm Tellin' Y'all It's Sabotage

Su,Su,Su, So Listen Up 'Cause You Can't Say Nothin'
You'll Shut Me Down With A Push Of Your Button
But I'm Out And I'm Gone
I'll Tell You Now I Keep It On And On

"Cause What You See You Might Not Get
And We Can Bet So Don't You Get Souped Yet
You're Scheming On A Thing That's A Mirage
I'm Trying To Tell You Now It's Sabotage
Why; Our Backs Are Now Against The Wall
Listen All Of Y'all It's A Sabotage
Listen All Of Y'all It's A Sabotage
Listen All Of Y'all It's A Sabotage

Beastie Boyzzzz
Reply With Quote
  #35 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Birdzeye's Avatar
Birdzeye Birdzeye is offline
U.S. House Representative

 
Member Since: Feb 2007
Location: East Coast
Posts: 591

United_States     Argentina

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rakkasan View Post
I think both sides need to stop fucking around

and support the damn troops
I'll support them by buying them phone cards, donating goods and money to prepare care packages for them, but I'll be damned if I'm going to support this asinine war that Bush has gotten us into!
Reply With Quote
  #36 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by AjaxPress View Post
So you're saying a few words have a bigger impact on our troops than an entire strategy? That does go in-line with neocon thinking. After all, Dubya has discarded miltary tactics for rhetoric.
What do you call the Surge strategy, which has so far been succesful? Wars are fought on many fronts, both psychological and physical. We are not winning the psychological war due to the liberals quest for power.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Hail to the king, baby!

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,570

Colorado     United_States

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
What do you call the Surge strategy, which has so far been succesful? Wars are fought on many fronts, both psychological and physical. We are not winning the psychological war due to the liberals quest for power.
__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam
Reply With Quote
  #38 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Ash's Avatar
Ash Ash is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
Hail to the king, baby!

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Denver Colorado
Posts: 1,570

Colorado     United_States

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

jviehe you drink WAY too much kool aid!
__________________
"Bring the boys back home!"--Pink Floyd

NFA JJG 42-95

Free People/Free Markets

Following the Path of the Beam
Reply With Quote
  #39 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
varrussword varrussword is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Sep 2004
Location: south
Posts: 3,640

   
Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
What do you call the Surge strategy, which has so far been succesful? Wars are fought on many fronts, both psychological and physical. We are not winning the psychological war due to the liberals quest for power.
We both know the liberals are doing everything in their power to see the war effort fail; and they're getting plenty of support from the liberal media. They want us out of this war before the next election because they know if the war continues they stand no chance. They're willing to put this country at risk if there's even the remote possibility they might have a president elected.

Varus
Reply With Quote
  #40 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
AjaxPress's Avatar
AjaxPress AjaxPress is offline
Secretary of State

 
Member Since: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,856

United_States     Ethiopia

Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
What do you call the Surge strategy, which has so far been succesful? Wars are fought on many fronts, both psychological and physical. We are not winning the psychological war due to the liberals quest for power.
You're a covert operative from the Daily Show aren't you? Dan Bakkedahl is that you?
__________________
Is our children learning? -George W. Bush

"I think—tide turning—see, as I remember—I was raised in the desert, but tides kind of—it's easy to see a tide turn—did I say those words?"—Washington, D.C., June 14, 2006

"[T]he illiteracy level of our children are appalling."—Washington, D.C., Jan. 23, 2004
Reply With Quote
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is online now
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 12,728

   
Re: Congres proposes to insert another "poison pill" in war funding bill

Quote:
Originally Posted by varrussword View Post
They want us out of this war before the next election because they know if the war continues they stand no chance.
Oh, I wouldn't bet on that.

If the war continues through the next election, the battle-cry of the Democrats will be "Bush couldn't get us out", and they'll be right. In fact, Republicans would probably fare better at the polls if the war is over before the election.

If the war is still going on in November 2008, there's going to be an absolute blood-letting of the Republican party...

Quote:
They're willing to put this country at risk if there's even the remote possibility they might have a president elected.
Another short-sighted view.

Anyone who thinks that the Democrats have only a remote chance of having a President elected needs to step away from the Kool Aid pitcher and take a look around. Republicans are starting to distance themselves from the idea that we need to maintain the status quo in Iraq.

If things remain the same, I'd predict a Democratic landslide victory...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
Danny's Avatar
Danny Danny is offline
Large delivers

 
Member Since: Mar 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,051

Canada     United_States

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wrxsti View Post
At this time, I would agree we cannot take on China. When the war on terror has been won, however, we will most likely need to address the potential Chines threat as well.

I believe you misunderstand the reference to the noble cause - it has nothing to do with the Iraqi (or Chinese) people and thier happiness, and everything to do with protecting the interests of the US and keeping our status as the lone superpower.
Interesting argument. I'd like to address it as I don't think I've seen this before as a rationale for the war.

I agree that protecting one's interests could be a valid reason for war under exceptional circumstances. I don't believe the Iraqi oil was in danger of being cut off in 2003 however. Even if it was, a diplomatic solution could have gotten the job done and I don't mean some flimsy UN resolution.

Keeping the US status as a superpower is extremely important for the sustainable development of human kind in my opinion. I don't think that power was being threatened however. Iran and NK are far more threatening to the US than Iraq ever was. I'd also argue that the occupation has weakened the US substantially.

If I may ask you to clarify your rationale further it would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2007
scarywoody scarywoody is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 549

United_States     Germany

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
Youre severly misinformed. We have had a constant benchmark system that we will leave when Iraq is able to take care of its own security.
Ok so how does one measure this? What you have stated is not a measurable goal. It has got to be a lot more in depth with constant smaller goals leading up to the big goal. Not a huge clusterfuck and then hoping to eventually make it to the big goal.

Quote:
Furthermore, Bush is accountable to the people, not congress.
Right, but congress "represents" the people...theoretically.


Quote:
And the people relected him, so he can do what he wants till his term is over.
No matter how bad it is for the country?

Quote:
Finally, all congress has to do is not pass a funding bill. Then the troops come home. But, the constitution puts the President in charge of military operations. Congress shut up about strategy.
Well I think the president has already failed in the strategy department. The american people want change and that is what congress is reflecting.
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 05-11-2007
jviehe's Avatar
jviehe jviehe is offline
President

 
Member Since: Jan 2004
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Posts: 10,571

United_States    
Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scarywoody View Post
Ok so how does one measure this? What you have stated is not a measurable goal. It has got to be a lot more in depth with constant smaller goals leading up to the big goal. Not a huge clusterfuck and then hoping to eventually make it to the big goal.


Right, but congress "represents" the people...theoretically.



No matter how bad it is for the country?



Well I think the president has already failed in the strategy department. The american people want change and that is what congress is reflecting.
And congress confirmed Rumsfelds replacement, fully knowing what he intended to do, which is continue the fight. Doesnt that indicate they support it? And yes, congress represents the people, so they are equally accountable to the people, not to Bush, and vice versa. As for specific military goals, they are well laid out and measured in the constant military brefings and stability reports to congress. Here is the latest.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...mar2007-01.htm

The problem, as always, is that you liberals get your information soley from the press and preferred pundits, and therefore miss out on the primary source material out there. Just because CNN doesnt report it, doesnt mean it didnt happen.
__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 05-12-2007
scarywoody scarywoody is offline
Governor

 
Member Since: Jun 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 549

United_States     Germany

Re: Bush threatens to Veto the next war funding bill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jviehe View Post
And congress confirmed Rumsfelds replacement, fully knowing what he intended to do, which is continue the fight. Doesnt that indicate they support it? And yes, congress represents the people, so they are equally accountable to the people, not to Bush, and vice versa. As for specific military goals, they are well laid out and measured in the constant military brefings and stability reports to congress. Here is the latest.

Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq - March 2007

The problem, as always, is that you liberals

I read until here and then I knew you weren't capable of any serious thought.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6
Copyright © 2000 - 2008 U.S. Politics Online