Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!
![]() |
|
|||||||
| Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
You mean like in the military?
|
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Can I ask a question here?
If I have discovered that I have a diease which needs a costly treatment which I have no insurance for I can go out break a law get sent to jail and get treated for nothing? |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
Pretty much. or you could just show up to the ER and they HAVE to treat you. Only downfall is the wait times
__________________
I said Conservative not necessarly Republican or Democrat. Liberals are in both of those parties.
|
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
You're hardly the first person to suggest that clause authorizes the government to spend money wherever it wishes, but what you're forgetting (or ignoring) is that clause is modified and restricted by following sections of the Constitution. Keep reading. You'll get it eventually.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
You do realize what the military receives is in compensation for duties performed, do you not?
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
That way it won't be misconstrued.
__________________
![]() So this is how liberty ends... with thunderous applause In a Democracy, Silence is Permission |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
"General welfare of the United States" does not equate to "charity" or "pay for the things that someone doesn't want to provide for himself so he pretends its a right".
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
How about the part where it says the President can issue Signing Statements rather than using his constitution power of the VETO ?
__________________
![]() So this is how liberty ends... with thunderous applause In a Democracy, Silence is Permission |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
While I was on active duty, the military gave me some money each month for housing, but that was it. It would be enough money, each month, to buy a really nice tent.
Food? The Navy paid for my food with what was known as "COMRATS" (commuted rations). It was far closer to a McDonald's budget than a fine dining budget. Also, when I was stationed on a ship, that money went away. Sure they fed me but, hey, they're also taking me out to sea. Clothing? The military doesn't pay for a stitch of clothing. I don't know where people get that idea. When a new recruit gets his uniforms in basic training, they moeny for those uniforms is pulled out of the recruit's pay...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin": ![]() ![]() Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING" |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
Thats a blatant and intentional misrepresentation of signing statements, pushed by people who should know better to distort the perceptions of those who do not. Signing statements have been used since the beginning of this country and they carry precisely zero force of law. They are nothing but the comments of the signer.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
The fact that some of the lower ranking NCO's make barely enough to feed their families, and in some cases, qualify for food stamps, for example, is beyond offensive to me. Even moreso when you consider the demands placed upon those men and women. Were the people on active duty to have jobs in the private sector with similar responsibilities, they would be compensated extremely well. When looking at the responsibilities of either E-6 or O-4 and above, private sector compensation would easily be in the 6 figures - yet the military pays them peanuts. Thank you for your service Steve - I mean that sincerely. Those who have never had contact with the armed forces outside of a protest march, will never truly understand what you do.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
I laugh at people like you describe. They know nothing of the topic, yet they speak as though they're absolute authorities on the issue. In all cases, they're complete fools. They believe that "being in the military" means to "serve George Bush". Of course, we know, it doesn't. It's a service to country. People who do it don't decide to do it, or continue to do it, because of who's in the White House. I signed up while Jimmy Carter was President, and served while Reagan, Bush, and Clinton were in the White House. Who the CINC was didn't matter to me when it came time to decide whether or not I should stay in or get out. The myopic hammerheads who are critical of the military, though, will never understand what military service means. They'll blurt out about how people can't get a job, are lazy, can't get into college, etc. Those instances are very few and far bewteen, yet the hammerheads present them as if they're the majority of cases. The hammerheads are ignorant and stupid, you see. They're just too ignorant and stupid to realize it...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin": ![]() ![]() Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING" |
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
I just watched a show not too long ago on Discovery Channel about life aboard an aircraft carrier. They were chatting with the executive chef and with those serving aboard the ship about how nutritional and good the food is. They discussed the importance of quality nutrition, which makes sense to me. What makes them so special that they get free food? There are plenty other people who do honourable work for poor wages. Why can't they get free food? |
|
||||
|
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?
Quote:
Quote:
Again, its not free. Do PLEASE try to understand this concept. Are you retarded? Seriously - I'm not trying to insult you, I genuinely wish to know if you have a learning and/or comprehension disability.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete. |