Visit the U.S. Politics Online Discussion Forum Archives!

Sponsored by:

U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum  

Bookmark Us! E-Mail DONATE NOW! Photo Gallery Document Archives Quiz! Register to Vote!!!
Go Back   U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum > Current Events > Breaking News in Politics

Breaking News in Politics A forum to discuss what is going on in the political world today.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #496 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Angry American's Avatar
Angry American Angry American is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 1,980

United_States     Pennsylvania

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
But so would food, wouldn't it? Clothing? Wouldn't those be covered under "general welfare"?

Do you think the government should be responsible for giving each and every citizen a house to live in, clothing to wear, and three meals a day? Wouldn't all of those things be covered?

How much would you propose we tax each and every tax paying citizen so that the government can provide all of those things?

Why should we stop at health care? If a case can be made for health care, then a strong case can be made for the others, as well...
We already subsidize housing for a large portion of our population, which includes free food, free clothes, free cable, free utilities, and get this free health care. It's called prison.

Why should prisoners get more than the general population?

Maybe the homeless should just find a way to get their hands on a couple ounces of crack, so they can get busted and sent to prison.

You are the only one advocating free housing, clothing, and food; though I don't see the downside to providing such things (except for maybe a corrupt administration).
__________________
Big Number of 2008
8,217,246
Obama's Margin of Victory

"Shake off all the fears of servile prejudices, under which weak minds are servilely crouched. Fix reason firmly in her seat, and call on her tribunal for every fact, every opinion. Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear."

-Thomas Jefferson

Reply With Quote
  #497 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
dannotoronto dannotoronto is offline
Governor
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 541

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Do you think the government should be responsible for giving each and every citizen a house to live in, clothing to wear, and three meals a day? Wouldn't all of those things be covered?
You mean like in the military?
Reply With Quote
  #498 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
CowboyTed CowboyTed is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member

 
Member Since: Apr 2006
Location: Galway, Ireland
Posts: 1,536

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Can I ask a question here?

If I have discovered that I have a diease which needs a costly treatment which I have no insurance for I can go out break a law get sent to jail and get treated for nothing?
Reply With Quote
  #499 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Miscreantgnomie's Avatar
Miscreantgnomie Miscreantgnomie is offline
Joint Chiefs of Staff Member
The Witty Sarcastic Gnome

 
Member Since: Jul 2006
Location: Castroville Texas
Posts: 1,620

United_States     Texas

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CowboyTed View Post
Can I ask a question here?

If I have discovered that I have a diease which needs a costly treatment which I have no insurance for I can go out break a law get sent to jail and get treated for nothing?

Pretty much.

or you could just show up to the ER and they HAVE to treat you. Only downfall is the wait times
__________________
Hardcore Conservative !

I said Conservative not necessarly Republican or Democrat. Liberals are in both of those parties.

Reply With Quote
  #500 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owl Mirror View Post
I would assume the Health of each Citizen would be covered under the clause: general Welfare of the United States
You can assume that but it does not.

You're hardly the first person to suggest that clause authorizes the government to spend money wherever it wishes, but what you're forgetting (or ignoring) is that clause is modified and restricted by following sections of the Constitution.

Keep reading. You'll get it eventually.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #501 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
You mean like in the military?
You do realize what the military receives is in compensation for duties performed, do you not?
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #502 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Owl Mirror's Avatar
Owl Mirror Owl Mirror is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 482

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricOKC View Post
You can assume that but it does not.

You're hardly the first person to suggest that clause authorizes the government to spend money wherever it wishes, but what you're forgetting (or ignoring) is that clause is modified and restricted by following sections of the Constitution.

Keep reading. You'll get it eventually.
Why not simply show me the text you claim ?
That way it won't be misconstrued.
__________________
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f378/owlmirror/GoodNightandGoodLuck-1.gif
So this is how liberty ends... with thunderous applause
In a Democracy, Silence is Permission
Reply With Quote
  #503 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owl Mirror View Post
Why not simply show me the text you claim ?
That way it won't be misconstrued.
Read it yourself. Its immediately following the sentence you cherry-picked out of context.

"General welfare of the United States" does not equate to "charity" or "pay for the things that someone doesn't want to provide for himself so he pretends its a right".
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #504 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Owl Mirror's Avatar
Owl Mirror Owl Mirror is offline
Lieutenant Governor

 
Member Since: Sep 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 482

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricOKC View Post
Read it yourself. Its immediately following the sentence you cherry-picked out of context.

"General welfare of the United States" does not equate to "charity" or "pay for the things that someone doesn't want to provide for himself so he pretends its a right".
Quote:
Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto

All bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States; If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.
Quote:
Section 8 - Powers of Congress

The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and Post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;

To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;

To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; And

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
Hmm? So unless it is clearly stated in the constitution, it's not covered under law ?
How about the part where it says the President can issue Signing Statements rather than using his constitution power of the VETO ?
__________________
http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f378/owlmirror/GoodNightandGoodLuck-1.gif
So this is how liberty ends... with thunderous applause
In a Democracy, Silence is Permission
Reply With Quote
  #505 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,562

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
You mean like in the military?
While I was on active duty, the military gave me some money each month for housing, but that was it. It would be enough money, each month, to buy a really nice tent.

Food? The Navy paid for my food with what was known as "COMRATS" (commuted rations). It was far closer to a McDonald's budget than a fine dining budget. Also, when I was stationed on a ship, that money went away. Sure they fed me but, hey, they're also taking me out to sea.

Clothing? The military doesn't pay for a stitch of clothing. I don't know where people get that idea. When a new recruit gets his uniforms in basic training, they moeny for those uniforms is pulled out of the recruit's pay...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #506 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Owl Mirror View Post
Hmm? So unless it is clearly stated in the constitution, it's not covered under law ?
Correct. The government may only do what is explicitly permitted, and everything else is prohibited. That concept is codified and clarified in the 9th and 10th amendments. (BTW - Constitution is capitalized - it is a proper noun. Not discounting your position through the grammar police, just making you aware of proper usage)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Owl Mirror View Post
How about the part where it says the President can issue Signing Statements rather than using his constitution power of the VETO ?
Thats a blatant and intentional misrepresentation of signing statements, pushed by people who should know better to distort the perceptions of those who do not. Signing statements have been used since the beginning of this country and they carry precisely zero force of law. They are nothing but the comments of the signer.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #507 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
While I was on active duty, the military gave me some money each month for housing, but that was it. It would be enough money, each month, to buy a really nice tent.

Food? The Navy paid for my food with what was known as "COMRATS" (commuted rations). It was far closer to a McDonald's budget than a fine dining budget. Also, when I was stationed on a ship, that money went away. Sure they fed me but, hey, they're also taking me out to sea.

Clothing? The military doesn't pay for a stitch of clothing. I don't know where people get that idea. When a new recruit gets his uniforms in basic training, they moeny for those uniforms is pulled out of the recruit's pay...
Unfortunately Steve, a lot of people are under some serious misconceptions about the military and what/how it pays/compensates the troops. If they knew the facts, it might truly horrify some of them.

The fact that some of the lower ranking NCO's make barely enough to feed their families, and in some cases, qualify for food stamps, for example, is beyond offensive to me. Even moreso when you consider the demands placed upon those men and women.

Were the people on active duty to have jobs in the private sector with similar responsibilities, they would be compensated extremely well. When looking at the responsibilities of either E-6 or O-4 and above, private sector compensation would easily be in the 6 figures - yet the military pays them peanuts.

Thank you for your service Steve - I mean that sincerely. Those who have never had contact with the armed forces outside of a protest march, will never truly understand what you do.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.
Reply With Quote
  #508 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
Steve's Avatar
Steve Steve is offline
President

 
Member Since: Nov 2006
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,562

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricOKC View Post
Thank you for your service Steve - I mean that sincerely. Those who have never had contact with the armed forces outside of a protest march, will never truly understand what you do.
Well, what I did. I retired from the Navy almost seven years ago.

I laugh at people like you describe. They know nothing of the topic, yet they speak as though they're absolute authorities on the issue. In all cases, they're complete fools.

They believe that "being in the military" means to "serve George Bush". Of course, we know, it doesn't. It's a service to country. People who do it don't decide to do it, or continue to do it, because of who's in the White House.

I signed up while Jimmy Carter was President, and served while Reagan, Bush, and Clinton were in the White House. Who the CINC was didn't matter to me when it came time to decide whether or not I should stay in or get out.

The myopic hammerheads who are critical of the military, though, will never understand what military service means. They'll blurt out about how people can't get a job, are lazy, can't get into college, etc. Those instances are very few and far bewteen, yet the hammerheads present them as if they're the majority of cases.

The hammerheads are ignorant and stupid, you see. They're just too ignorant and stupid to realize it...
__________________
Obama's New "57 State Patriotic Pin":




Sayeth John Drake - 10/13/08: "OK, you're right, I admit to LYING"
Reply With Quote
  #509 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
dannotoronto dannotoronto is offline
Governor
Permanently Banned

 
Member Since: Jun 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 541

   
Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve View Post
While I was on active duty, the military gave me some money each month for housing, but that was it. It would be enough money, each month, to buy a really nice tent.

Food? The Navy paid for my food with what was known as "COMRATS" (commuted rations). It was far closer to a McDonald's budget than a fine dining budget. Also, when I was stationed on a ship, that money went away. Sure they fed me but, hey, they're also taking me out to sea.

Clothing? The military doesn't pay for a stitch of clothing. I don't know where people get that idea. When a new recruit gets his uniforms in basic training, they moeny for those uniforms is pulled out of the recruit's pay...
So then you should not have any problem with the rest of society receiving a "little money" each month to purchase a nice tent.

I just watched a show not too long ago on Discovery Channel about life aboard an aircraft carrier. They were chatting with the executive chef and with those serving aboard the ship about how nutritional and good the food is. They discussed the importance of quality nutrition, which makes sense to me.

What makes them so special that they get free food?

There are plenty other people who do honourable work for poor wages. Why can't they get free food?
Reply With Quote
  #510 (permalink)  
Old 10-09-2007
EricOKC's Avatar
EricOKC EricOKC is offline
Vice President
The one your parents warned you about

 
Member Since: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 8,594

Texas     United_States

Re: Bush vows to veto children's health care bill ... because it's too costly?

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
So then you should not have any problem with the rest of society receiving a "little money" each month to purchase a nice tent.
Danno - its called "compensation", not "charity". Active duty military are paid for a job they perform.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
I just watched a show not too long ago on Discovery Channel about life aboard an aircraft carrier. They were chatting with the executive chef and with those serving aboard the ship about how nutritional and good the food is. They discussed the importance of quality nutrition, which makes sense to me.
Great. You watched TV. I'm happy for you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
What makes them so special that they get free food?
Again, its not free. Do PLEASE try to understand this concept.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dannotoronto View Post
There are plenty other people who do honourable work for poor wages. Why can't they get free food?
Are you retarded? Seriously - I'm not trying to insult you, I genuinely wish to know if you have a learning and/or comprehension disability.
__________________
In case you were wondering, yes, there really ARE more idiots these days....technology has made natural selection obsolete.