like yelling "fire" in a crowded movie theater? Or using speech to stir up a riot? Or saying you're going to kill the president? I think there may be limitations. Just a guess.

__________________
Anyone ask Hillary what kind of underwear she wears, yet?

Lt. Gov Diane Denish on Bill Richardson "The governor, she said, "pinches my neck. He touches my hip, my thigh, sort of the side of my leg."

Also - the majority of the donating military support Paul.

__________________

Even in my own house? What about my business? Can I restrict employees from making sexually offensive comments to the customers?

__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.

just post a disclaimer saying your employers may say something sexually offensive but this doesnt necessarily represent the opinions of the company to protect yourself from lawsuits

Try that in the real world and let us know how it works out for you.



Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

What lawsuit? Freedom of speech and all.

__________________
http://www.fairtax.org

Elminate all taxes on income and replace with a national sales tax.

It's the principle that mkultra is warning us about, Meridious. Losing your freedoms is similar to catching a virus. At first you get infected by just a few. Then,.....

Gem

__________________
There is no political solution to our troubled evolution.

"Reality, the left-wing liberal conspiracy. "
Credited to Angry American.

There is not, nor has there ever been, a "right to free speech" in the private sector.

Matt

__________________
De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum

^^^^ FTW!

__________________
Anyone ask Hillary what kind of underwear she wears, yet?

Lt. Gov Diane Denish on Bill Richardson "The governor, she said, "pinches my neck. He touches my hip, my thigh, sort of the side of my leg."

There is no law being broken here and no constitutional issue at play.

People have a right to say things and also to be inpolite and being total a**holes
and also the right to say "shut up" and also the right to be a**holes saying other people to "shut up".

In my opinion the original players showing the hand-written sign were a little bit inpolite and a little bit out of order,
but an amount that is pretty normal and should be tolerated.

The official of the bridge association was totally being an a**hole when getting ballistic with a vengeance.
If he would have just said "please don't do that any more" that would have been perfectly fine.

What is significant is that even if there is no law being broken and this is not a "freedom of speech" issue in legal sense
this is still very much an issue of freedom in other meanings of the word.

A society that has very strict code of conduct that people are supposed to follow in order not to be shunned by fellow people
is much less free society that does not have such strict code of conduct.

The society could require that people dress always in strict business suit (or a burkha)
and not speak against the supreme commander in chief
or they would be stricken the right to be respected members of the society
or allowed to travel abroad for playing bridge in the company of other members of the association.

No laws are being broken in that, but still that would be a sad state of affairs.
I would not like to live in a non-free society like that.
I would also shake my head in disbelief when the members of that society declare themselves to be the most free people in the universe.

.

uhmmm, I'll have to ask for a source on that please.....not a lot of people even know who he is....

__________________
No individual can plan his own existence in their view.

So the state planners must arrogate to themselves the right to manipulate any sector of the economic system if the good of “society” or the “general welfare” is paramount.

Ipso- if the rights of the individual get in the way, the rights of the individual must be sublimated.

The Road to Serfdom
FA Hayek (interpretation)


Mortgage Backed Security survivor

He has had $16,440 donated to his campaign according to Viper's links.

Ron Paul's campaign manager says the "average" donation was $500...again according to Viper's links.

Ok...so that would be about THIRTY-TWO donars.

WHEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What OVERHWELMING military support!

32 soldiers!!!!!!!!! Out of 2.2 MILLION.

But I give the more likely number of $1 per donation, which gives 16,340 donors...which STILL is less than 1% of 1% of the military.

yet he falsely touts this a "the majority of the military" or "number 1 with the military"

How pathetic he is to use such false statements to try to rouse support for his lunatic candidate.

__________________

yes there is--you just have to pay for it thats all

the real lunatic is in the White House--My dog woulda made a better President then Bush whose ONLY success is his ability to destabilize the entire world so he can steal better in the chaos

btw I think its pretty great your ignoring my posts cause now I can correct yours and you wont answer back

follow the links

Ron Paul Rocks

__________________